ALOHA AGAIN FINE FOLKS! Welcome once more to the weird and wonderful world of vintage guitars and thank you for joining me, a self‑confessed music and guitar nerd. Why not leave behind the senseless barbarism of heinous hostilities seemingly everywhere you look on our one and only home planet for a short while and join me on another peaceful and harmless diversion? If music has the power to change the world, then let’s put a proverbial platter on the turntable of life and play on and on until common sense prevails. Perhaps the collective majority of sensible people need another counter‑culture revolution. What can possibly be wrong with a bit of peace and love? We can hope. Anyhoo… I digress once more and I haven’t even got going yet. Apologies for the premature non sequitur.
Artificial Intelligence Part II
AI revisited
Artificial Intelligence (AI), as a current day technological marvel, is perhaps the antithesis to the bits of old‑world wood, metal and plastic cobbled together into desirable musical instruments. Despite the seeming disconnect, this article is Part II of III exploring what the current state of AI can contribute towards the subject. Like ‘Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back’ this article isn’t just a ‘difficult filling in the sandwich’, it actually does stand up pretty well on its own. There is no doubting the potential of AI in many areas of our lives but can it really do justice to vintage guitars?
There is no need to repeat preparatory exposition this month. The historical development of AI was covered pretty comprehensively in ‘Part I’ last month. If you want to go back for a recap or a first look at the basics, follow the link below (opens in a new tab):
In Part I of the series, the entirety of AI’s output in response to 20 questions on the multifaceted world of CRAVE Vintage Guitars resulted in, literally, a black & white article comprising text‑only descriptions, mostly presented as bullet point lists. AI had the opportunity to present images to back up its results. However, it provided zero pictures, relying solely on words to make its points. To me, that seemed to be a major omission and was something a rational human (probably) wouldn’t do. I certainly wouldn’t, at least not out of choice. So, the next logical step was to address that pictorial oversight directly and see what AI would reveal when asked unequivocally to produce images. A digital depiction is worth a thousand kilobytes, so to speak.
CRAVE Vintage Guitars 8-Bit Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitar
“True art is characterised by an irresistible urge in the creative artist” – Albert Einstein (1879‑1955)
The rationale
I don’t usually write anecdotally but please bear with me for a moment. While the next bit may seem irrelevant, it does, I believe, demonstrate some of the complications with, and ramifications of, AI as it stands at the current time.
Being a admirer of modern art, I recently wanted an art print for my home. After doing my research, I came down to a work by Latvian‑born American artist Mark Rothko (1903‑1970), best known for his abstract colour field paintings produced from 1949 until his death. The piece I selected is called, ‘Blue, Green and Brown’ (1952). I approached a professional studio to print the image for me. The studio couldn’t acquire a high resolution image for accurate printing at the size I wanted, so they proceeded to put a lower resolution image through an AI enlargement tool to produce an image of sufficiently high resolution to be printed without obvious pixilation and digital artefacts. While the proof looked pleasant enough in isolation, when compared directly with the original, AI had egregiously robbed the image of its quintessential artistic detail, rendering it a pale imitation of the real thing, much like a good amateur forgery. AI had removed many of the ‘imperfections’ that made the original unique. Many people might actually prefer the manipulated image or they may not even realise it had been ‘bastardised’. This, to me was an issue. Personally, I much preferred the integrity of the original artistic creation, as Rothko intended it to be seen. Sadly, because of copyright, I cannot share the evidence but, believe me, in a small way it reveals implications of AI for many of humanity’s creative arts.
“A painting is not a picture of an experience, but is the experience” – Mark Rothko (1903‑1970)
The intentional act of digitally ‘airbrushing’ out the supposed defectiveness in our 21st Century world – whether it is intentional or not – is a concern. What is worse is that it is an incremental insidious intrusion. It is happening all around us, every day – whether it is subtle or blatant – and has been for a long time. Just take a look at studio photos of fashion models, actresses, pop stars, etc. This interventionist rendering transforms reality into a skewed, artificially ‘improved’ view of something that somebody, somewhere considered imperfect. This alteration from real to surreal is a worrying trend, and one that we may not even be aware of under normal everyday circumstances. We have all become unwittingly complicit in accepting these glossy facsimiles as, in some way, genuine and even aspirational. The trend is surreptitiously subverting our expectations of the tangible. On top of the word Photoshop becoming a verb rather than a noun, AI is exacerbating this issue and very soon, we won’t be able to tell that it is being done. What you see isn’t what you get. A picture can tell a thousand lies.
The author’s recent experiences led directly to the rationale for Part II of this exploration into what AI’s digital world view of vintage guitars may look like. Whereas last month’s article was a test of AI’s narrative approach to vintage guitars, this month, we will be focusing solely on AI’s interpretation of vintage guitars in visual form. Other than the prologue and epilogue, there is nothing herein authentically human.
Generative AI (GAI) tools like Midjourney and OpenAI’s DALL‑E 3 are easily accessible and are being used widely to produce pictures (generative art) by interpreting written instructions. This is the straightforward process used to submit the examples presented in this article. Can Generative Artificial Intelligence really create intelligent art? Let us see. The proof is out there and the quest to unearth the evidence continues unabated.
“Art is not what you see, but what you make others see” – Edgar Degas (1834‑1917)
The CRAVE Guitars’ test
I will present AI with some specific challenges and see how AI responds and, once again, I will let the AI do the hard work. As before, I will leave my humble critique until the end of the article.
Last month, I suggested eight benchmarks for evaluating AI’s responses, summarised below:
To understand a question correctly without over‑specificity
To interpret and extrapolate relevant information objectively within a wider context
To present a cogent argument that can adequately be judged and/or challenged
To form a genuine opinion from scratch without relevant information being readily available in the first place, in the same way that a person might do in the case of uncertainty
To debate the initial result to achieve a potentially better outcome
To produce a creative response that improves on the original information input by humans
To remember what it has already output
To understand fully what humans want or expect from ‘intelligence’
While these tests were intended to provide an assessment framework for last month’s narrative responses, they mostly still work for images (sort of, with a bit of imagination). Unlike last month, there are far fewer words and plenty of pictures this time around.
“Art is the lie that enables us to realize the truth.” – Pablo Picasso (1881‑1973)
Twenty Questions – AI produced images of vintage guitars
I asked a GAI image creator to produce digital images based on simple text instructions. A small proportion of the results are shown below. In each case, I have presented at least two images for each instruction and in several cases more to show the diversity (or not) of what AI created. So, there are well over 50 AI images for your delectation. There were plenty of others produced. I don’t suggest that the ones used are the ‘best’, only that they were representative of the instruction. Hopefully, by the end, you can make up your own mind about how effective the technology is. With my permission, GAI will now take centre stage and I will potter off to make multiple cups of coffee. See you later for my opinion.
Instruction #1 – Design a logo for CRAVE Vintage Guitars
AI response #1
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Logos
Instruction #2 – Create a physical guitar shop and museum/gallery designs for CRAVE Vintage Guitars
AI response #2
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Shop DesignsCrave Vintage Guitars AI Gallery Designs
Instruction #3 – Create a web site home page design for CRAVE Vintage Guitars
AI response #3
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Home Page Designs
Instruction #4 – Create a magazine advertisement for CRAVE Vintage Guitars with images of several vintage guitars
AI response #4
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Magazine Ad Designs
Instruction #5 – Create digital art showing a sunburst vintage guitar against a background of amplifiers and speaker cabinets with an Asian rug in the foreground. A number of effect pedals on the floor
AI response #5
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Guitar Amps & Effects
Instruction #6 – Create digital art showing a black and white vintage guitar in its guitar case with a purple fur fabric interior along with a strap and lead coiled in a compartment
AI response #6
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Black & White Guitar in Case
Instruction #7 – Create digital art showing number of vintage Gibson and Fender solid body electric guitars displayed hanging on a classically decorated solid wall along with logo memorabilia
AI response #7
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Wall Displays
Instruction #8 – Create digital art showing a vintage solid body electric guitar on a luthier’s workbench
AI response #8
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Guitar Workbench
Instruction #9 – Create digital art showing a jazz guitarist on stage wearing a zoot suit and playing a vintage jazz guitar with backing band
AI response #9
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Jazz Guitarist
Instruction #10 – Create digital art showing a blues guitarist wearing a dark suit and hat sitting on a smoky stage playing a vintage electric jazz guitar plugged into a vintage valve combo amp
AI response #10
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Blues Guitarist
Instruction #11 – Create digital art showing a hippie with long hair, tie‑dye shirt and flared jeans playing a vintage solid body electric guitar on an open air music festival stage with a backing band and bright, psychedelic light show
AI response #11
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Psych Rock Guitarist
Instruction #12 – Create digital art showing a heavy metal guitarist on a dark stage playing a vintage solid body electric guitar, dressed in a Goth inspired outfit
AI response #12
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Metal Guitarist
Instruction #13 – Create digital art showing a Rastafarian reggae guitarist on a black, green, red and yellow stage playing an electric solid body vintage guitar, with a backing band
AI response #13
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Reggae Guitarist
Instruction #14 – Create digital art showing a well‑dressed funk/disco guitarist playing a vintage electric guitar on stage with a mirror ball
AI response #14
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Funk Disco Guitarist
Instruction #15 – Create digital art showing a folk guitarist playing a vintage steel strung acoustic guitar with a backing band on a folk festival stage
AI response #15
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Folk Guitarist
Instruction #16 – Create digital art showing a classical guitarist playing a vintage nylon strung acoustic guitar seated on a stage
AI response #16
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Classical Guitarist
Instruction #17 – Create digital art showing a young rock guitarist playing a vintage electric guitar through a vintage amplifier sitting on a bed in a bedroom with walls covered in music posters
AI response #17
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Bedroom Guitarist
Instruction #18 – Create digital art of a vintage guitar in [a variety] of fine art styles [including Renaissance, impressionist, realist, abstract, romantic, pop art, optical art, expressionist, cubist, art nouveau, art deco, dada, Bauhaus, primitivism, pointillist, and pre‑Raphaelite]. NB. See if you can identify the styles from the images.
AI response #18
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 1Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 2Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 3Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 4Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 5Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 6
Instruction #19 – Create digital art of a vintage guitar in [a variety] of modern graphic art styles [including illustration, eight‑bit, fantasy, manga, anime, futurist, sci‑fi, and steampunk]. NB. See if you can identify the styles from the images.
AI response #19
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 1Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 2Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 3Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 4Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 5Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 6
Instruction #20 – Create digital art of a vintage solid body electric guitar found in a dusty, cobwebbed attic amongst other objects d’art
AI response #20
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Loft Guitar
Just for a bit of fun, I also asked GAI to ‘use Crave Guitars as a starting point, create digital art of an ‘ideal’ Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitar’. The result was…
Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitar
Hhhmmm.
Human observation and verdict
Well? Are you downright dazzled, dizzyingly discombobulated or decidedly dumbfounded?
First, let’s get the disclaimers out of the way. As mentioned in a previous article, I am not an artist or designer but I feel that I have a reasonable eye for what works and what doesn’t. My generalised opinions, as always, are entirely my own and therefore humanly flawed.
So, there you have it. No words this time, just a plethora of GAI created images based on just twenty or so straightforward text inputs. The images are exactly as produced by the AI image creator; they have not been manipulated in any way.
The legal situation, as far as I can ascertain is that the copyright for the images belongs exclusively to the person who input the criteria used to create the image, not the GAI platform itself. Just as a camera manufacturer doesn’t have copyright over the images produced by a photographer using one of its products. So, at the time of writing, I am within my rights to publish the images and to copyright them as part of this article for the purposes of objective analysis and critique.
It is clear that the technology is very, very clever indeed and also very powerful. However, it is worth remembering that it is just an IT system, albeit a potent one. It would take a long time for a human to create ‘new’ images like those that took seconds using a GAI image creator. I certainly couldn’t produce images like these from scratch whether using traditional or technological means, so kudos to GAI for that alone. On the surface and with a quick glance, some of the images are almost convincing. It is only when scrutinising the images with any kind of critical eye that things begin to fall apart very quickly. The devil really is in the detail.
For instance, the CRAVE Guitars logos are unusable with misspellings, artefacts, anomalies, strange letters/words and peculiar components. Also, why no simple logos and what about logos using colour? The results are VERY different form the genuine CRAVE Guitars logo. I still prefer the human original to the over‑fussy monochrome GAI creations.
Can GAI produce authentic original intelligent art all by itself? No, I don’t believe so. As of now, AI image building remains derivative. Its algorithms work by sampling a vastly diverse range of artistic styles and using that as the basis for producing ‘new’ images. Try inputting insufficient or vague information for the algorithms to work on and it struggles. Even some quite specific instructions result in a ‘fail’.
There are still, at least for now, discernible differences between GAI‑created art and genuine art created by humans. AI is a tool but it isn’t (yet) a replacement for human imagination and artistic expression. AI can, however, help to bring a fresh perspective, explore new vistas and to push the boundaries of existing art and photography. In the future, I predict that a proportion of art will undoubtedly be a collaboration between human creativity and machine manipulation.
After requesting many variations of multiple images, it is clear that GAI has an ‘artistic style’ of its own and, once recognised, it quickly becomes generic and, at least to my eyes unappealing. Much like generic CGI (Computer Generated Imagery) in cinema, the human eye and brain can differentiate the artificial outputs from practical effects, resulting in the digital output being disappointingly unconvincing, at least most of the time.
When it comes to the guitars themselves, GAI clearly has no real idea of (and perhaps more importantly, simply doesn’t care) what a guitar is, how it is created, what its functions are and the differences between them. That is, I believe a fundamental part of the problem. GAI does not comprehend in the slightest what comprises an actual musical instrument, vintage or otherwise. To all intents and purposes, the concept of a guitar (or anything else for that matter) may as well be a plain lump of rock to GAI. At least a human artist would have some conception of what it is they are attempting to portray.
“In the literal sense, the programmed computer understands what the car or the adding machine understand: namely, exactly nothing” – John Searle (1932‑, American philosopher)
Many of the body shapes are unrecognisable, pickups are plain wrong, control layouts are bizarre, necks and fingerboard inlays are completely out of whack. Some ‘guitars’ have semi‑acoustic f‑holes where there shouldn’t be any. Proportions are often wrong and headstocks don’t match body type, etc. GAI also seems inclined to add plenty of unnecessary embellishments, decorations and accoutrements for no apparent reason. Peculiar.
Interestingly, in terms of equality, I didn’t specify race, gender or age to the GAI image creator. Of the images featuring guitarists, they were predominantly (but not exclusively) white, male and younger. None of the guitarists featured were left‑handed. Why this should be, other than perhaps reflecting the source material used by GAI, I know not. Like 21st Century first world nations, GAI has some way to go in learning about diversity.
The images may impress a total newbie to guitars but I’m sure anyone with any sort of interest in guitars, let alone vintage instruments, would not be convinced in the slightest. To an expert, the renditions jar significantly and are simply unacceptable representations. The images couldn’t really be used in any genuine situation other than, for instance, a critique like this. The images made me contemplate just what they could actually be used for. They don’t even work as a genuine artistic impression of reality. At best, GAI is a simulation of reality, not reality.
If GAI images would be used in a real situation, they would probably need far more specific instructions and or greater computing power to interpret genuine instruments realistically. In addition, further human manipulation would be required to finesse the images before they could be suitable. To me, there is a gaping difference between a picture and a painting or an image and a work of art.
“Art is a line around your thoughts” – Gustav Klimt (1862‑1918)
Interestingly, when asked to create digital art in the style of a specific school (e.g. surrealist, impressionist, cubist or art deco) or a specific artist (e.g. Andy Warhol, Picasso or Salvador Dali), GAI failed completely to generate something representative of the art form or artist. On the other hand, GAI could create digital art in a way that current human artists may not conceive. Although impressive in its own right, it again completely missed the point. Amusingly to me, at least, the first three letters of ‘artificial’ are ‘art’. GAI’s representational interpretation of real art isn’t actually art, it is an artifice (sic!). GAI images are not really inspirational or worthy of evoking or stimulating a profound emotional response in the way a genuine work of art might warrant. Yet.
I could go on and on about where faults may be found. However, that level of pedantic analysis would kinda miss the point of what this article is trying to demonstrate. GAI will undoubtedly get much, much better and probably not very long after this published article becomes obsolete. GAI image creation technology, at least to me, is a work‑in‑progress. That last comment is exactly what I said about the narrative responses in the previous article
Perhaps a synergetic integral relationship between GAI and humans should really be called ‘Augmented Intelligence’ (still AI). After all, and it is worth stating, computer generated artwork is nothing new. Humans have been using computers in art, design, animation, typography, film and photography (and many other forms of artistic expression) for a very long time, long before GAI came onto the scene. Digital tools like Adobe Photoshop and Corel PaintShop Pro are today’s graphic industry standards and they are beginning to integrate AI technology into their software in order to stay current and relevant. Therefore, using generative art technology is essentially only a natural progression along that very long evolutionary road. As such, then, it cannot be condemned out of hand.
So, cutting to the chase, would any of the images pass the Turing Test or even the CRAVE Guitars Test? Not to anyone with any interest or insight into the subject matter. Personally, I won’t be using AI imagery for serious use any time soon. I think that most professional artists in the creative industries would probably agree. However, it would be naïve of me to suggest that it won’t improve to the point where an AI image might be indistinguishable from something a human might envisage. Definitely not yet though. For me, I’m sticking to the likes of Mark Rothko for my modern art fix.
“The most interesting painting is one that expresses more of what one thinks than of what one sees” – Mark Rothko (1903‑1970)
Final thoughts on AI
Right, here we are, two thirds of the way through this 3‑part exploration of what AI can do within the context of the vintage guitar world. So far, so… erm, OK‑ish. At its most superficial, the technology is already truly remarkable and getting better all the time, so it would be disingenuous and immature to propose otherwise. However, as GAI stands at the time or writing, it still has some way to go.
It is all too easy to be swayed by the clever technology as a means, rather than focus purely on the pragmatic usefulness of the outcome as an end. The former is undoubtedly extraordinary, while the latter is still, for the time being at least, lacking. It is the ultimate inadequacy of the results that is still AI’s principal weakness. Given that the publically available GAI tools are still in their infancy, that mundane conclusion will, I suspect, be short‑lived. We should, perhaps, remember that we wouldn’t have been undertaking this sort of examination a year or two ago and in a year or two’s time, the benchmark by which we judge comparative differences will definitely be significantly raised.
For now, GAI is not a David Hockney, Damien Hirst, Edward Hopper or Banksy. Thankfully. It is probably worth keeping an eye on how things evolve from here on.
“We are entering a new world where creative machines will be our partners, not just tools.” – Fei‑Fei Li (Computer scientist, 1976‑)
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Album of the Month’
Sticking to last month’s determination to avoid the generic style of music that could be created by AI, this month’s selection is another miracle of human creativity, while still being mainstream. This month’s accolade therefore goes to…
Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds – Push The Sky Away (2013) – The fifteenth studio album by Australian Nick Cave and his band The Bad Seeds was released in mid‑February 2013. Nick Cave described the album, “if I were to use that threadbare metaphor of albums being like children, then Push The Sky Away is the ghost‑baby in the incubator and Warren [Ellis]‘s loops are its tiny, trembling heartbeat.” Very apt. The album preceded the tragic deaths of his two sons in 2015 and 2022, so it retains a lighter, though still profound, side to Cave’s song writing. The concluding title track is the culmination of something sublime and, is in itself, a monumental emotional and transcendent achievement in its gentle but devastating mere 4 minutes and 7 seconds. A worthy album of the month and a work of (creative human) art indeed.
Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds – Push The Sky Away (2013)
“The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance” – Aristotle (384‑322BCE)
Tailpiece
Phew! Two parts down and one to go. While the first was a ballsy barrage of words, this has been a veritable visual volley of pupil‑popping pictures (I had to get at least one pretentious puerile alliterative assonance in. Sorry folks).
I truly hope that you have been able to gain something from this intermediate excursion into the endless expanse of the artificial unknown. Every day, The Matrix gets closer to reality, whatever that is. Has the journey so far in any way changed my perspective on vintage guitars? No. It has, however, changed my perspective on technology. Before embarking on this journey, I must admit that I had very little idea about what AI could do. There is, I believe, no doubt that AI can be an exciting enabler for humanity’s benefit, provided its darker, far more perilous potential is properly constrained by responsible human moderation.
As a teaser, next month will be the conclusion of this extensive round‑the‑computer AI trip. For Part III, we will take a different look at the bigger music industry picture within which vintage guitars occupy a small but important niche. Until then, enjoy the spring in the northern hemisphere and autumn in the south.
Truth, peace, love, and guitar music be with you always. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “It is better to fail at trying to be a good person than succeed at being a bad one”
GOOD DAY AND GREETINGS, MUSIC‑MINDED CITIZENS. For this month and for the next two we’re taking a 3‑part sojourn in uncharted lands (as medieval cartographers once denoted, ‘terra incognita’) and what monstrosities may inhabit those unexplored territories (‘hic sunt dracones’, literally translated as ‘here be dragons’). Yes folks, it is time for CRAVE Guitars to explore a current‑day innovation that once seemed surreal but is rapidly becoming increasingly real; a phenomenon that the original makers of what we now know as vintage guitars could never have envisaged (probably).
Whether we like it or not, the faddish fuss around Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a ‘BIG THING’ at the moment. At the forefront of the debate are the societal dilemmas posed by sophisticated systems potentially becoming more intelligent than human beings (in my experience, not particularly difficult in many cases!).
“I’d rather see artificial intelligence than no intelligence” – Michael Crichton (American author)
In a worst case scenario, how does a supposedly civilised society prevent malicious actors using AI technology for nefarious means? A profound question indeed. Prescient Hollywood film director James Cameron’s bleak vision of Cyberdyne Systems, Skynet and Terminators can, perhaps, be taken as an extreme but stark lesson. The rise of the machines, taking over the world and resulting in the potential obliteration of humanity is a chilling proposition. It seems we already have too many twisted tyrants willing and attempting to achieve that end right now with and without AI and robotics as the means. Just spare a moment to think what deranged despots could do with the technology and what the consequences may be for everyone in the very near future. AI’s potential demands that collectively we address the challenge of what needs to be done to avoid the annihilation of civilisation through unhindered autonomous technological advance.
“Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony” – the character Morpheus from ‘The Matrix’ (1999)
What on Earth does this divergent dystopian diatribe (apologies, folks) have to do with vintage guitars and music you may well be justified in asking? Very little, other than as an existential context. From here on, we’ll be taking a far more parochial and prosaically pedestrian path.
Like many people, I have become curious about what AI means for culture and specifically for the creative crafts. Given my obsession with vintage guitars and music, I thought I’d turn my attention to what AI might have to say on the matter. So… that is the basis of this month’s article. For once, I can say, quite legitimately, that AI was used to research and write this article. This interesting (?) examination will not change the world but, then again, neither will it jeopardise it.
Artificial Intelligence Part I
“Choice is an illusion created between those with power and those without” – the character Merovingian from ‘The Matrix’ (1999)
Before we get to vintage guitars and what wisdom (or not) AI has to impart, we have to do some homework about AI so that the rest of the article makes sense. We’ll start with an English hero and take it from there.
Alan Turing and the Turing Test
The following description of one of the world’s most influential geniuses in the world of computers and artificial intelligence, comes direct, courtesy of Wikipedia… “Alan Mathison Turing (1912‑1954) was an English mathematician, computer scientist, logician, cryptanalyst, philosopher and theoretical biologist. Turing was highly influential in the development of theoretical computer science, providing a formalisation of the concepts of algorithm and computation with the Turing machine, which can be considered a model of a general‑purpose computer. He is widely considered to be the father of theoretical computer science and artificial intelligence.”
During World War II, civilian Alan Turing worked as a codebreaker based at the Government Code and Cypher School at the Bletchley Park country estate in Buckinghamshire, England. While there, Turing devised complex techniques for breaking German ciphers used by the Nazi’s military encryption device, the Enigma Machine, which had been invented by a German engineer Arthur Scherbius (1878‑1929) shortly after WWI. The Germans were confident that the system could not be broken. However, in 1942‑1943, Turing and his colleagues played a vital part in successfully cracking intercepted German encoded messages transmitted using the Enigma Machine. Turing’s historic achievements enabled the Allies to defeat the Axis powers in, particularly, the Battle of the Atlantic (1939‑1945).
After the end of the war in 1945, Turing invented the Automatic Computing Machine the world’s first digital computer capable of using stored programs. By 1950, Turing developed an experiment to gauge the ‘intelligence’ of a computer. His simple test requires that a human being should be unable to distinguish the machine from another human being by evaluating replies to questions put to both. The Turing Test, as it was known, is still regarded as a fundamental benchmark for assessing machine intelligence.
“Artificial Intelligence is what we don’t know how to do yet” – Alan Kay (American computer scientist)
Defining Artificial Intelligence
Now for the techy bit… Sorry, bear with me. The term ‘artificial intelligence’ was first used in 1956 at a Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence held at Dartmouth College, a private Ivy League research university based in Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. The conference was organised by computer scientist and Assistant Professor of Mathematics at Dartmouth College, John McCarthy (1927‑2011). The project proposed, “that every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it”.
In 1958, American psychologist Frank Rosenblatt (1928‑1971) outlined what he regarded as “the first machine which is capable of having an original idea”. Rosenblatt’s concept was the ‘Perceptron’, a program inspired by the way the human brain works, which ran on a state‑of‑the‑art IBM mainframe computer. The Perceptron was a rudimentary version of a neural network, comprising interconnected nodes (neurons) that process and learn from data, enabling tasks such as pattern recognition and decision making. Rosenblatt was regarded as ‘the father of deep learning’.
As early as the 1960s, computer scientists and neuroscientists were already teaching computers how to mimic human decision‑making processes, which developed into research around what is known today as ‘machine learning’.
“If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn’t” – Emerson M. Pugh (American physicist)
In 1997, IBM’s ‘Deep Blue’, an expert chess program running on a unique, purpose‑built IBM supercomputer, beat the Russian chess grandmaster, Garry Kasparov, leading to the description of rules‑based ‘Traditional AI’. While Deep Blue may have been excellent at playing chess, its talents were capable of little else.
“AI is the most exciting tech of our time” – Tim Cook (CEO, Apple Inc.)
Artificial Intelligence is now a mainstream branch of computer science that refers to IT systems capable of performing complex tasks that attempt to replicate human thought and intelligence. AI’s systematic tasks include analysing data, identifying patterns, recognising speech, solving problems, proposing solutions and taking decisions.
“Artificial intelligence is one of the most profound things we’re working on as humanity. It is more profound than fire or electricity” – Sundar Pichai (CEO, Google and Alphabet Inc.)
As of early 2024, not all AIs are created equal. Traditional AI (a.k.a. Weak AI or Narrow AI) is an umbrella term for computer systems that employ supervised learning and discriminative models to solve specific tasks using predefined rules, Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Large Language Models (LLMs).
“Denial is the most predictable of all human responses” – the character The Architect from ‘The Matrix’ (1999)
The category of AI that we will be looking at in this article is called Generative AI, also referred to as GenAI or GAI, which is a relatively new subset of AI. Generative AI allows users to input a variety of prompts to generate content, such as text, images, videos, sounds, 3D designs and other types of media.
“We’re living in the golden age of AI” – Jeff Bezos (founder, Amazon)
The distinctive aspect of GAI is that it uses unsupervised deep machine learning models to generate new material based on patterns of data acquired from existing sources. GAI models work on large unlabelled data sets that require complex mathematical algorithms and a great deal of computing power to analyse and build constructs.
“While AI has tremendous potential to transform industries, we must not forget the impact it could have on society and must work to mitigate potential risks” – Elon Musk (CEO, Tesla and SpaceX)
Generative AI models don’t stand still; they continue to evolve at an increasingly rapid rate, as they learn from additional data as it becomes available. It is the quality of the data sets that enable the AI to predict responsible outcomes and undertake a range of cognitive tasks in the same way that a human might.
“The question is not whether intelligent machines can have any emotions, but whether machines can be intelligent without any emotions” – Marvin Minsky (American computer scientist, MIT)
Over time, it is inevitable that GAI’s ability will catch up with, and ultimately surpass, that of humans. The nature, pace and potential of GAI is causing concern among some experts and policy makers because of the moral and ethical issues it raises, particularly if AI’s unbridled behaviour is not moderated in some way by responsible human intervention. The risks of uncontrolled or poorly controlled AI models are swiftly becoming both tangible and potentially unsafe.
“We should not be afraid of AI. Instead, we should hope for the amazing amount of good it will do in the world” – Mark Zuckerberg (founder, Meta Inc.)
So, the next question is, what comes after GAI? Well, GAI still has a long way to go and that will keep innovators such as OpenAI and Deep Mind hard at work pushing the boundaries of what is possible for some time yet. After that, the most likely development would be Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or Artificial General Superintelligence (AGS). The aim is to build a device that can do anything the human brain can do (and more) and to integrate that with the rapidly developing parallel field of advanced robotics to create a machine that can do anything the human body can do (and more). Scary? Super intelligent super robots may well finally demonstrate that yesterday’s science fiction is becoming today’s science fact.
“I am in the camp that is concerned about superintelligence. But I don’t think we need to be fatalistic about it” Bill Gates (founder, Microsoft)
However, let’s not get bogged down by credible or fanciful conspiracy theories and get back to the matter in hand.
Applying Artificial Intelligence to the world of vintage guitars
Phew! Back to basics and more familiar territory. After all that preliminary exposition, I think we can all probably agree that AI is one of topical themes of the first half of the 2020s. Not wishing to be left behind, I thought CRAVE Guitars should try to get AI to respond to a series of questions about my favourite topic, vintage guitars. From my experience so far, all that the easily accessible public AI (as opposed to military‑grade AI) can do is to extract information that is already available on the Internet (whether right or wrong) and to compose it into straightforward responses to an input.
Before we start, I will lay my cards on the table and state my starting position, which, may or may not change by the time this article has concluded. My naïve biological brain came up with eight statements that set out what AI does not (or cannot) currently do. In my view, AI struggles…
To understand a question correctly without over‑specificity (i.e. it can’t deal with vague ambiguity)
To interpret and extrapolate relevant information objectively within a wider context (i.e. the bigger picture)
To present a cogent argument that can adequately be judged and/or challenged
To form a genuine opinion from scratch without relevant information being readily available in the first place, in the same way that a person might do in the case of uncertainty (i.e. its ability to make genuinely informed assumptions from limited information)
To debate the initial result to achieve a potentially better outcome (i.e. to learn from the interaction on the spot and adjust its responses accordingly)
To produce a creative response that improves on the original information input by humans
To remember what it has already output (i.e. as part of a continuous ‘dialogue’ – as here – each question is treated as a new subject with no memory of previous questions)
To understand fully what humans want or expect from ‘intelligence’ (i.e. something coherent and interesting)
Assessing AI’s responses against those eight points is this article’s main challenge.
Below, I pose 20 (plus 2) questions to AI and present its verbatim response to each question (bar correcting the occasional heinous ‘typo’ or bad grammar, which in itself is a bit ironic!), so that you can judge for yourselves just how close AI might be to succeeding at transcending its silicon‑based electronic components (‘deus ex machina’ – god from the machine – if you will). More importantly, you can gauge whether AI can make any sense of the intricately complex subject of vintage guitars. So… can AI pass the CRAVE Guitars Test? We’ll see.
There are no images in the main part of this article. AI did not present any pictures to support its answers, so I haven’t embellished the words with anything additional, as it might skew the results. What you see below is what I got, no more, no less; untainted in any way.
The material presented here is not appropriated as belonging to, or being the view of CRAVE Guitars in any way; it is presented here solely for information, intellectual evaluation and critique.
“Change is never painful, only the resistance to change is painful” Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama ‑ c.480‑400BCE)
Right. That’s my involvement pretty much at an end for now. I’m off to make a cup of tea or ten. See you again at the end of the article with my appraisal of how I think AI did.
20 Questions about vintage guitars posed to AI
Question #1 – What is the definition of a vintage guitar?
AI Response #1 – A vintage guitar is an older guitar that is usually sought after and maintained by avid collectors or musicians. The term can indicate either that an instrument is merely old or that it is sought after for its tonal quality, cosmetic appearance, or historical significance. While there is no strict chronological definition for what makes something vintage, guitars around 30 years old or older typically fall into this category. Even newer instruments are often labelled as vintage by sellers. So, if you come across a beautifully aged guitar with a rich history, it just might be a vintage gem!
Question #2 – Why should I be interested in vintage guitars?
AI Response #2 – Vintage guitars have a unique appeal and charm due to their age and history. They often possess a certain character and sound that cannot be replicated by newer guitars. In addition, vintage guitars can appreciate in value over time, making them a valuable investment. However, they can be expensive and require careful maintenance. Understanding the vintage guitar market, knowing what to look for when buying, and appreciating the unique sound and playability of these instruments are key to making a worthwhile purchase. Ask professional guitar dealers on how to navigate the vintage guitar market.
Question #3 – What are the best things about vintage guitars?
AI Response #3 – Vintage guitars have several unique qualities that make them highly desirable for musicians and collectors alike:
Tonal Character: Vintage guitars often have a distinct and rich sound that sets them apart from newer instruments. The aging of the wood, hardware, and electronics contributes to their unique tonal character. Musicians appreciate the warmth, resonance, and depth of vintage guitar tones.
Craftsmanship: Many vintage guitars were meticulously handcrafted by skilled luthiers. These instruments showcase exceptional attention to detail, fine workmanship, and quality materials. The craftsmanship of vintage guitars reflects the artistry and dedication of their makers.
Historical Significance: Vintage guitars carry a piece of musical history. They have witnessed decades of music, performances, and cultural shifts. Owning a vintage guitar connects you to the past and allows you to be part of a musical legacy.
Collectability: Vintage guitars are sought after by collectors and enthusiasts. Their scarcity and historical value contribute to their collectible status. Some iconic models, such as the Gibson Les Paul or Fender Stratocaster, have become legendary in the music world.
Investment Potential: While not all vintage guitars appreciate significantly in value, some rare and sought‑after models can be excellent investments. If you choose wisely and maintain the instrument well, it may appreciate over time.
Visual Appeal: Vintage guitars often exhibit beautiful designs, unique finishes, and intricate inlays. Their aesthetics evoke nostalgia and admiration. Whether it’s the graceful curves of a vintage hollow‑body or the simplicity of a vintage Telecaster, these guitars are visually captivating.
Playing Experience: Many musicians find that playing a vintage guitar is a special experience. The feel of the neck, the responsiveness of the fretboard, and the way the guitar resonates under their fingers create a connection that transcends mere functionality.
Story and Provenance: Each vintage guitar has a story to tell. Who played it? Was it used on famous recordings? Did it travel the world with a touring band? Uncovering the history and provenance of a vintage guitar adds to its allure.
Remember that owning a vintage guitar requires careful consideration. Factors like condition, authenticity, and playability matter. Whether you’re a seasoned guitarist or a collector, the allure of vintage guitars lies in their blend of art, history, and music.
Question #4 – What are the worst things about vintage guitars?
AI Response #4 – While vintage guitars have their allure, there are some potential downsides to consider:
Condition and Maintenance: Vintage guitars may have endured decades of use, wear, and aging. Their condition can vary significantly. Some may require extensive repairs, refrets, or replacement parts. Regular maintenance is essential to keep them playable.
Fragility: Older guitars can be delicate. The wood may have dried out, making it more susceptible to cracks or warping. Vintage finishes are often thin and prone to chipping. Handling them with care is crucial.
Cost: Authentic vintage guitars can be expensive. Rare models or those associated with famous musicians command high prices. If you’re on a budget, acquiring a well‑preserved vintage instrument may be challenging.
Limited Availability: Truly exceptional vintage guitars are scarce. Finding the right one—especially in good condition—can be time‑consuming. Patience and persistence are necessary.
Playability: While vintage guitars have character, not all of them are easy to play. Neck profiles, fret sizes, and action may differ from modern standards. Some vintage instruments may feel less ergonomic.
Incompatibility with Modern Gear: Vintage guitars may lack features found in contemporary models. For example, they might not have versatile pickup configurations, tremolo systems, or locking tuners. Compatibility with modern amplifiers and effects can be an issue.
Weight: Some vintage electric guitars, especially solid‑body models, can be heavy. Prolonged playing sessions may strain your back and shoulders.
Risk of Fakes and Forgeries: The vintage guitar market attracts counterfeiters. It’s essential to verify authenticity and provenance. Consult experts or reputable dealers to avoid purchasing a fake.
Investment Uncertainty: While some vintage guitars appreciate in value, it’s not guaranteed. Market trends fluctuate, and economic factors play a role. Buying solely for investment purposes can be risky.
Sentimental Value: Owning a vintage guitar with historical significance can be emotionally rewarding. However, if you’re purely focused on practicality, the sentimental aspect may not matter to you.
Remember that each vintage guitar is unique, and what some consider drawbacks, others may view as part of their charm. Consider your preferences, playing style, and budget when deciding whether a vintage guitar is right for you.
Question #5 – What are the most desirable vintage guitar brands?
AI Response #5 – Vintage guitars have a rich history, and some lesser‑known brands have become highly desirable among collectors and musicians. Here are a few vintage guitar brands worth exploring:
Bartell: Although less known, Bartell guitars gained attention when one of their models was associated with Jimi Hendrix’s collection. The Black Widow is one of their notable guitars. Bartell was a Californian‑based company that produced around 2000 guitars between 1964 and 1969.
Electra: Active during the 1970s and early 1980s, Electra guitars were made in Japan and sold in the United States. They gained popularity for their good quality and reasonable prices. Notably, Electra introduced the MPC (Modular Powered Circuits) guitars, which featured replaceable effect modules—a unique concept at the time.
Hondo: Often mistaken for the automobile brand Honda, Hondo was an American guitar company founded in 1969. They aimed to produce quality entry‑level instruments in Korea and Japan while maintaining consistency with U.S.‑made guitars. Hondo’s steel‑string acoustics and electric guitars gained recognition. In 1978, they even used DiMarzio pickups, making them pioneers among overseas guitar manufacturers.
Airline: Airline guitars, popular in the 1960s, were produced by Valco and later Harmony. Their quirky designs, including the ‘Jetsons’ look, make them sought after by collectors today.
Supro: Supro guitars were part of the Valco family and gained prominence in the 1960s. Their unique tone, often associated with blues and rock, appeals to vintage enthusiasts.
Teisco: Teisco, a Japanese brand, flooded the market with budget‑friendly guitars in the 1960s. Their funky designs, including offset bodies and unusual pickup configurations, have a cult following.
Hagstrom: Hagstrom, a Swedish brand, produced guitars with innovative features like the ‘resinator’ fingerboard. Their vintage models are prized for their playability and distinct sound.
Remember that desirability varies based on personal preferences, rarity, and historical significance. Exploring these vintage brands can lead to hidden gems and unique instruments that resonate with your musical style.
Question #6 – What instruments are the most desirable vintage guitars?
AI Response #6 – Vintage guitars hold a special allure for collectors and musicians alike. Let’s explore some of the most desirable vintage guitars based on their historical significance, rarity, and iconic status:
1958‑’59 Gibson Explorer:
Value: Between $250,000 and $310,000.
Why: The Explorer, with its futuristic design, initially received little attention from buyers. However, its African limba (marketed as ‘Korina’) body and unique sound have made it highly sought after by collectors.
1936‑’42 Martin D‑45:
Value: Ranging from $250,000 to $400,000.
Why: Martin dreadnoughts are revered, and the D‑45, adorned with Brazilian rosewood back and sides, ivory binding, and intricate fretboard inlays, remains a pinnacle of steel‑string acoustics.
1958‑’60 Gibson Les Paul Standard:
Value: Approximately $225,000 to $375,000.
Why: Initially overlooked, the Les Paul gained prominence after Eric Clapton and Michael Bloomfield played it. Today, it’s not only a collectable solid body but also a symbol of guitar history.
1930‑’33 Martin OM‑45:
Value: Estimated at $265,000 to $350,000.
Why: Rarity drives its value; only a handful were made each year. The first‑year ‘Deluxe’ version commands the highest prices.
1958‑’59 Gibson Flying V:
Value: Around $200,000 to $250,000.
Why: Like the Explorer, the Flying V’s Korina body design was ahead of its time. Only 98 were produced, making it a prized collector’s item.
These guitars not only represent exceptional craftsmanship but also evoke the magic of music history. Whether you’re a player or an investor, vintage guitars continue to captivate enthusiasts worldwide.
Question #7 – Are American vintage guitars better than ones from other countries?
AI Response #7 – The quality of guitars is determined by a variety of factors, including the materials used, the craftsmanship, and the design. While American‑made guitars are often considered to be of high quality, it’s not necessarily true that they are better than guitars made in other countries.
In fact, many guitarists prefer guitars made in Japan, Korea, or Mexico, for example. These countries have a long history of producing high‑quality instruments, and many guitarists appreciate the unique sound and feel of guitars made in these regions.
Ultimately, the best guitar for you depends on your personal preferences and playing style. It’s important to try out different guitars and find one that feels comfortable and sounds great to you.
Question #8 – What is the state of the vintage guitar market today?
AI Response #8 – The vintage guitar market has been through ups and downs over the years. According to a 2009 article by Premier Guitar, the vintage market was down 20 to 30 percent from its 2007 peak, with oversaturated pockets of the market down even further. However, a 2021 report by Market Strides suggests that the vintage guitar market is expected to grow in the coming years, with key market trends and dynamics analysed for major geographies and countries.
If you’re interested in buying or selling vintage guitars, you might want to check out Reverb’s Price Guide. It records the sale price of used or vintage instruments sold on Reverb, providing a fair market range for buyers and sellers.
Question #9 – Are vintage guitars a worthwhile investment?
AI Response #9 – Vintage guitars, like a well‑aged wine or a classic novel, evoke a sense of nostalgia and craftsmanship. But are they a wise investment? Let’s explore the fretted path of vintage guitar investments:
Historical Appeal:
Vintage guitars carry a piece of musical history. Owning an instrument that has been played by legendary musicians can be emotionally rewarding.
Collectability: Rare models, limited editions, or guitars associated with iconic artists tend to appreciate in value over time.
Market Trends:
The vintage guitar market has seen fluctuations. While some models skyrocket in value, others remain steady or decline.
Research: Investigate trends, consult experts, and track auction results. Knowledge is your tuning peg.
Condition Matters:
Originality: Unaltered vintage guitars fetch higher prices. Modifications can dampen their investment potential.
Wear and Tear: Light wear adds character, but excessive damage affects value.
Supply and Demand:
Scarcity: Limited supply drives up prices. Seek out guitars with low production numbers.
Desirability: Popular brands (Gibson, Fender) and models (Stratocaster, Les Paul) remain sought after.
Playability vs. Investment:
Play First: Buy a vintage guitar because you love its sound and feel. Enjoy playing it!
Investment Second: While some vintage guitars appreciate, it’s not guaranteed. Don’t solely rely on them as financial assets.
Diversification:
Portfolio Approach: If you’re investing, diversify. Don’t put all your strings in one guitar case.
Other Instruments: Consider violins, mandolins, or rare basses.
Long‑Term Commitment:
Vintage guitars require care, maintenance, and storage. They’re not a quick flip.
Patience: Appreciation often takes years, not months.
In conclusion, vintage guitars can be a rewarding investment if you’re passionate about music, appreciate craftsmanship, and understand the risks. Whether you strum for profit or pleasure, let your heart and ears guide you.
Question #10 – Which vintage guitars are simply not worth investing in?
AI Response #10 – Vintage guitars can indeed be a rewarding investment, but not all of them are equally valuable. Let’s explore which ones might not be worth your investment:
Mass‑Produced Models:
Guitar factories churned out many models in the past. Some of these are abundant and lack the rarity that drives up value.
Avoid: Generic models with little historical significance.
Obscure Brands:
Lesser‑known brands may not have the same collector appeal. Their limited demand affects their investment potential.
Avoid: Guitars from obscure or defunct manufacturers unless they have unique features or historical context.
Poor Condition:
Wear and Tear: Severely damaged or heavily modified guitars lose value. Repairs can be costly.
Avoid: Instruments with extensive cracks, warped necks, or missing parts.
Overpriced Celebrity Associations:
Be Sceptical: Some sellers inflate prices based on dubious claims of celebrity ownership.
Avoid: Guitars with exaggerated stories unless there’s solid evidence.
Fads and Trends:
Beware of Hype: Trends come and go. What’s hot today may not be tomorrow.
Avoid: Investing solely based on current trends. Look for timeless appeal.
Avoid: Assuming every old guitar will skyrocket in value.
Remember, research is your best ally. Seek advice from experts, explore reputable dealers, and play the guitars yourself. Whether you’re strumming for passion or profit, choose wisely!
Question #11 – What vintage guitars are likely to become more desirable in the next 5 years?
AI Response #11 – The world of vintage guitars is a fascinating blend of history, craftsmanship, and musical magic. While predicting the future is akin to tuning an old guitar by ear, here are some intriguing candidates that might appreciate in value over the next five years:
Gibson Les Paul Signature (1974):
Often overlooked, the Les Paul Signature from the ’70s has hidden potential. Its versatility shines through various genres, especially when cranked through a Marshall amp. Keep an eye out for these criminally underrated semi‑hollow beauties.
Fender Starcaster (1976–80):
Originally overshadowed, the Fender Starcaster has gained traction. Ted Turner of Wishbone Ash fame owned one, and its unique pickups contribute to its allure. Expect further value appreciation in the coming decades.
Silvertone 1446 (1960s):
Crafted by Harmony, the Silvertone 1446 boasts Gibson‑made pickups with a distinct tone. It may not be the most refined instrument, but its sound and sexiness compensate. A vintage gem that could resonate with collectors.
Kay K775 Jazz II (1960s):
Eric Clapton’s early learning ground, the Kay K775 Jazz II, is gaining recognition. Despite Kay’s quality control reputation, this bolt‑on neck thinline surprises with its laminated figured maple top, Bigsby vibrato, and Barney Kessel–designed Kleenex Box single‑coils. A naughty guitar indeed.
Supro and Kay Archtops:
These old Supro and Kay guitars remain undervalued. While the overall vintage market fluctuates, these archtops haven’t fully rebounded. Their unique character and historical significance make them intriguing investments.
Remember, the guitar market dances to its own rhythm, influenced by players, trends, and nostalgia. Whether you strum for passion or profit, let your heart guide your choices.
Question #12 – What is the sort of return on investment that one might expect from collecting vintage guitars?
AI Response #12 – Collecting vintage guitars can indeed be a rewarding investment, combining passion for music with potential financial gains. Let’s explore why vintage guitars are an excellent strategy:
Tangible and Attractive:
Vintage guitars provide more than just financial value. They’re tangible pieces of history, beautiful to display, and enjoyable to collect.
Unlike stocks or bonds, you can admire and play them.
Stability and Appreciation:
Vintage guitars have consistently outperformed the stock market in terms of stability.
As they age, their value tends to appreciate, provided you maintain them well.
Superior Craftsmanship:
Vintage guitars often surpass modern counterparts in quality. They were meticulously crafted using fine materials.
Brands like Gibson Les Paul, Fender Telecaster, and CF Martin remain popular among collectors.
Guitar Brands to Consider:
Gibson Les Paul: These older models, made of oak, mahogany, and other fine materials, are highly sought after.
Fender: Look for ’50s and ’60s Telecasters, Stratocasters, and Thunderbirds.
CF Martin: Known for their acoustic excellence, Martin guitars from the 1960s hold significant value.
Guild: Although less famous, older Guild instruments are on par with Martin guitars of the same era.
Investment Potential:
While not every vintage guitar will skyrocket in value, a well‑chosen collection can yield substantial returns.
Research, learn about the models, and make informed decisions.
Remember, whether you’re a musician or simply appreciate the beauty of old guitars, vintage instruments offer a harmonious blend of passion and investment potential.
Question #13 – Are vintage guitars better than new guitars?
AI Response #13 – Vintage guitars and new guitars each have their own merits, and the answer depends on various factors. Let’s explore both sides:
Vintage Guitars:
Historical Charm: Vintage guitars carry a sense of history and nostalgia. Owning an instrument that has been played by legendary musicians can be emotionally rewarding.
Unique Tone: Some vintage guitars have aged tone woods that resonate differently. The wood dries out over time, leading to a more resonant tone with better sustain, especially in acoustic guitars.
Collectability: Rare models or those associated with iconic artists tend to appreciate in value over time.
New Guitars:
Advancements in Craftsmanship: Modern manufacturing techniques have improved significantly. CNC machines and precision tools allow for consistent builds.
Reliability: New guitars are generally more reliable. They undergo rigorous quality control and benefit from advancements in materials and construction.
Customisation: Custom shop guitars offer the best of both worlds. You can get a new guitar tailored to your preferences, combining vintage aesthetics with modern playability.
Quality Comparison:
Subtle Differences: Vintage guitars may have unique quirks due to handcrafted processes. For example, old Les Pauls had smaller frets and thicker necks.
Precision and Consistency: Modern CNC machines ensure precise fretwork and consistent results. Every Gibson today goes through a PLEK machine for levelling and crowning frets within micrometers.
Subjectivity:
‘Better’ Is Relative: The definition of ‘better’ varies. It’s subjective and depends on personal preferences.
Playability: Some players prefer the feel of vintage necks, while others enjoy the sleekness of modern profiles.
In summary, both vintage and new guitars have their place. Whether you seek historical charm, unique tones, or cutting‑edge craftsmanship, choose based on your playing style, preferences, and budget.
Question #14 – Should vintage guitars be used or preserved in museums?
AI Response #14 – Vintage guitars, like ancient manuscripts or Renaissance paintings, straddle the delicate balance between utility and preservation. Let’s explore both perspectives:
Playing and Using Vintage Guitars:
Sonic Legacy: Vintage guitars were crafted to be played. Their rich tones, unique characteristics, and historical significance come alive when strummed or picked.
Musical Connection: Owning a vintage instrument allows musicians to channel the spirit of past players. It’s a bridge across time and genres.
Art in Action: A vintage guitar’s true purpose is to create music. It yearns for fingers on frets, resonating strings, and melodies that echo through decades.
Preserving Vintage Guitars in Museums:
Cultural Artefacts: Museums safeguard our collective heritage. Vintage guitars, like ancient artefacts, tell stories of creativity, craftsmanship, and musical evolution.
Educational Value: Displaying vintage instruments educates visitors about music history, luthiery techniques, and the evolution of sound.
Conservation: Museums provide controlled environments, protecting guitars from wear, humidity, and light damage.
A Harmonious Balance:
Rotating Exhibits: Some museums allow playable vintage guitars in temporary exhibits. Musicians can strum them, and visitors appreciate their beauty.
Replicas and Demonstrations: Museums can create replicas for hands‑on experiences while preserving the originals.
Digital Archives: Recordings, videos, and virtual tours can complement physical displays.
In the grand symphony of cultural preservation, vintage guitars play a vital note. Whether they resonate in concert halls or rest behind glass, their melodies continue to echo through time.
Question #15 – Are collectors a good or bad thing for vintage guitars?
AI Response #15 – Collectors, like the silent guardians of a musical time capsule, wield both light and shadow upon the vintage guitar realm. Let us strum through their impact:
The Good Harmony:
Preservation: Collectors cradle vintage guitars, shielding them from the ravages of time. These instruments whisper secrets of bygone eras.
Curators of History: They curate private museums, preserving luthiery artistry and the soulful echoes of past players.
Financial Support: By investing in rare models, collectors contribute to the market’s stability and encourage craftsmanship.
The Dissonant Notes:
Inaccessibility: Some vintage guitars languish behind velvet ropes, yearning for calloused fingertips. Their music remains unheard.
Price Inflation: Collectors can inflate prices, making it harder for musicians to acquire playable vintage instruments.
Frozen Artefacts: When guitars become mere artefacts, their purpose shifts from music‑making to display.
The Ongoing Duet:
Balance: Collectors must harmonize preservation with accessibility. Rotate exhibits, allow touch, and share the magic.
Collaboration: Collaborate with musicians, luthiers, and enthusiasts. Let vintage guitars sing in live performances.
Legacy: Remember that these guitars once graced stages, studios, and hearts. Their legacy transcends wood and strings.
In the grand symphony of vintage guitars, collectors play a vital role. May they strum chords of reverence and resonance, bridging past and present.
Question #16 – What is the best advice for someone considering collecting vintage guitars?
AI Response #16 – Collecting vintage guitars is a harmonious blend of passion, history, and craftsmanship. Whether you’re a seasoned collector or just starting out, here’s some valuable advice:
Do Your Homework:
Know Your Instruments: Dive deep into the guitars you’re interested in. Understand their history, features, and quirks.
Learn Anomalies: Beyond books and the internet, explore anomalies not widely documented. Sometimes, hidden gems lie in those details.
Connect with Experts:
Trustworthy Sources: Build relationships with reputable dealers, collectors, and experts. Seek advice and learn from their experience.
Avoid Shady Sellers: Beware of untrustworthy sources. Not everyone has the same integrity in this world of vintage guitars.
Brand Matters:
Collectible Brands: Focus on heritage brands like Fender and Gibson. These classics tend to rise in value over time.
Rickenbackers: Often overlooked, Rickenbackers (played by the Beatles, Byrds, and Tom Petty) offer great American‑made guitars at reasonable prices.
Avoid eBay Frenzies:
While eBay is a treasure trove, it can also be a frenzy of bidding. Be cautious and aware of shill bidding.
Consider other platforms and auctions for a more measured approach.
Budget Wisely:
Set a Budget: Determine how much you’re willing to invest. Vintage guitars can range from affordable to astronomical.
Quality Over Quantity: Rather than amassing many guitars, focus on quality pieces that resonate with you.
Remember, collecting vintage guitars is not just about financial gain; it’s about connecting with music history and craftsmanship. Let your heart guide your collection, and may each guitar sing its unique melody in your hands!
Question #17 – What are good criteria for evaluating whether to buy a vintage guitar?
AI Response #17 – When considering buying a vintage guitar, it’s essential to assess various factors to ensure you’re making an informed decision. Here are some valuable criteria to evaluate:
Check The Frets:
Examine the condition of the frets. Worn frets can significantly impact playability.
Consider the cost of refretting if necessary. Lacquer issues on maple fingerboards may also need attention.
Electrical Components:
Don’t be alarmed by minor crackling or cutouts in the electronics.
Vintage guitars often need a little love in this area. Budget for potential repairs.
Moving Parts and Hardware:
Inspect tuners, bridges, and other hardware. Ensure they function smoothly.
Some vintage parts may be hard to find or expensive to replace.
Cosmetic Condition:
Don’t judge a book by its cover. Sometimes slightly worn or ‘cosmetically ropey’ guitars sound better.
Look beyond surface imperfections and focus on playability and resonance.
Research and Knowledge:
Understand the specific model you’re interested in. Learn about its history, features, and common issues.
Read reviews, consult experts, and explore online resources.
Budget Realistically:
Set a budget that considers not only the purchase price but also potential repairs or upgrades.
Vintage guitars often require adjustments to optimize playability.
Remember, vintage guitars are more than just instruments; they carry stories, character, and a connection to music history. Let your passion guide you, and may your chosen guitar resonate with your soul!
Question #18 – How to detect a fake from an authentic vintage guitar?
AI Response #18 – When evaluating a vintage guitar for authenticity, keep these criteria in mind:
Weight:
Authentic guitars have consistent weights based on their model and wood type.
Compare the weight of the guitar you’re examining with the average weight for that model.
Guitar Logo:
Download an image of the authentic model’s logo from the manufacturer’s website.
Compare it with the logo on the guitar you’re considering. Look for differences in size, shape, position, font, and staining around the logo.
Components and Hardware:
Inspect tuners, bridges, and other hardware. Authentic guitars use specific components.
Be cautious if anything looks off or doesn’t match the original model.
Sound hole (for Acoustic Guitars):
Authentic acoustic guitars have perfectly round and symmetrical sound holes.
If the sound hole appears irregular or poorly crafted, it might be a fake.
Serial Number:
Check the guitar’s serial number against databases or guides specific to the brand.
Serial numbers can reveal the guitar’s production year and authenticity.
Consult Experts:
Seek advice from reputable dealers, collectors, or luthiers.
They can spot subtle details that indicate authenticity.
Remember, a genuine vintage guitar carries history and soul. Whether you’re a player or collector, choose wisely and let the music resonate!
Question #19 – Are vintage bass guitars worth collecting?
AI Response #19 – Vintage bass guitars, like the heartbeat of a rhythm section, resonate with their own allure. Let’s explore why they’re worth collecting:
Historical Significance:
Vintage basses carry the pulse of music history. They’ve grooved through genres, recording studios, and live performances.
Owning one connects you to the basslines of legends like James Jamerson, Jaco Pastorius, and Paul McCartney.
Tonal Character:
Each vintage bass has a unique voice. The wood, pickups, and craftsmanship contribute to its signature sound.
Whether it’s the thump of a Fender Precision Bass or the growl of a Rickenbacker 4001, vintage basses offer distinct tones.
Investment Potential:
While not all vintage basses appreciate significantly, certain models do.
Brands like Fender, Gibson, and Music Man have iconic basses that hold value.
Craftsmanship:
Vintage basses were meticulously built by skilled luthiers. Their attention to detail and quality materials shine through.
The patina of age adds character, like the lines on a seasoned musician’s face.
Collectability:
Some basses are rare due to limited production runs or unique features.
Collectors seek these gems, creating demand and driving up prices.
Playing Experience:
Vintage basses feel different. Their neck profiles, weight, and balance offer a tactile experience.
Whether you’re a player or a collector, the joy of plucking those strings transcends time.
In the rhythm of life, vintage bass guitars provide the low notes that anchor melodies. Let your passion guide your collection, and may your basslines resonate!
Question #20 – What is CRAVE Guitars?
AI Response #20 – CRAVE Guitars is a fascinating venture that celebrates and showcases vintage American electric guitars, effects, and amplifiers. Let me break it down for you:
Name and Acronym:
The name ‘CRAVE’ is a clever play on words.
As an acronym, it stands for ‘Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric’ guitars.
Literally, it also means ‘to yearn for’ or ‘to want greatly’.
All these meanings are fitting for the world of vintage guitars.
Mission and Focus:
CRAVE Guitars aims to bring you some of the coolest American vintage electric guitars from iconic brands like Fender and Gibson, among others.
These guitars aren’t necessarily the most expensive or desirable ones but definitely have that special something that makes them stand out.
Non‑Profit Approach:
Unlike traditional dealers or collectors, CRAVE Guitars is a non‑profit enterprise.
It celebrates vintage guitars both as important musical heritage and as real instruments meant to be used and played.
The focus is on more affordable, underdog, and often quirky vintage guitars, effects, and amps.
Instead of the exotic and rarely played classics, CRAVE Guitars delves into the heart of the vintage guitar world.
Wabi‑Sabi and Imperfections:
CRAVE Guitars also embraces the Japanese concept of wabi‑sabi.
Wabi‑sabi appreciates the imperfections in objects, finding beauty in their flaws.
Vintage guitars, with their unique wear and history, embody this concept.
More Than Guitars:
Beyond guitars, CRAVE features galleries and information on vintage effect pedals (from brands like Electro‑Harmonix, MXR, BOSS, and Ibanez) and a small collection of vintage American valve amplifiers.
It’s a treasure trove for guitar enthusiasts and those who appreciate the magic of vintage gear.
So, if you’re curious or have a craving for all things vintage, explore the world of CRAVE Guitars and immerse yourself in the legacy of these remarkable instruments!
In addition, I also asked AI 2 supplementary questions relating to vintage amplifiers and vintage effects. Here is what AI put forward, very much in the same vein as the previous examples.
Question #21 – Are vintage amplifiers worth collecting?
AI Response #21 – Vintage amplifiers are like sonic time capsules, each carrying a unique story and tone. Here’s why they’re worth collecting:
Historical Significance:
Vintage amps shaped the sound of countless recordings. They’re the secret sauce behind iconic guitar tones.
Owning one connects you to the artists and eras that made music history.
Tonal Magic:
Vintage amps have a warmth and character that modern counterparts often lack.
Whether it’s the creamy overdrive of a Dumble Overdrive Special or the gritty blues of a Marshall JTM45, vintage amps offer distinct flavours.
Investment Potential:
While not all vintage amps appreciate significantly, certain models do.
Brands like Fender, Marshall, and Trainwreck hold value and continue to inspire players.
Craftsmanship:
These amps were handcrafted with care, using quality components.
The patina of age adds to their allure, like the wrinkles on a seasoned musician’s face.
Playing Experience:
Vintage amps respond differently. Their tubes, circuits, and speakers create a tactile connection.
Plug in and feel the magic—the way they react to your playing is unmatched.
So whether you’re a collector, player, or both, vintage amplifiers offer a symphony of history and sound.
Question #22 – Are vintage guitar effect pedals worth collecting?
AI Response #22 – Vintage guitar effect pedals are like hidden treasures waiting to be discovered. Let’s explore their allure:
Historical Gems:
Vintage pedals offer a glimpse into the evolution of effects. They’re like musical fossils, preserving sonic eras.
Owning one connects you to the creativity of past players and the birth of iconic sounds.
Tonal Mojo:
Each vintage pedal has a distinct flavour. The analogue circuits, aged components, and quirks create magic.
Whether it’s the warm fuzz of a Dallas Arbiter Fuzz Face or the psychedelic swirl of a Uni‑Vibe, vintage pedals offer sonic character.
Investment Potential:
While not every vintage pedal appreciates significantly, some models do.
Brands like Boss, Electro‑Harmonix, and Ibanez have cult classics that hold value.
Nostalgia and Inspiration:
Vintage pedals evoke memories of classic albums and legendary performances.
Plugging into a vintage pedal can spark creativity and transport you to musical moments.
Collectability:
Some pedals are rare due to limited production or unique features.
Collectors seek these gems, creating demand and driving up prices.
Remember, whether you’re a guitarist, collector, or sonic explorer, vintage pedals offer a symphony of history and sound.
Well, there you have it. 20+2 questions and 20+2 answers (and a haiku thrown in for good measure). What do you think? Apologies, that’s a rhetorical question. My thoughts on the matter are purely my own opinion based on what I was presented with. I am no expert on AI technology, so my observations are therefore, by nature, liable to organic fallibility and bias. I should state at this point that, in no way did I attempt to outwit or trick the AI models. The questions were very simple and the intent was purely to see what would happen. The results are uncorrupted by me in any way.
There are some truly cringe worthy phrases buried in amongst the relevant outputs – AI trying to be ‘clever’. AI can’t seem to master the human traits of irony, satire, wit, whimsy and sarcasm! Mind you, AI also doesn’t exhibit the less desirable human traits of arrogance, hubris, deceit (intentionally or innocently) or biased opinion, which is probably a good, although potentially less entertaining, thing. This jocular aspect, however, is a bit like the 17th Century Spanish idiom, ‘the pot calling the kettle black’ (NB. from a 1620 English translation of ‘Don Quixote’ by Miguel de Cervantes), especially given my innate trademark penchant for pretentious prose and affinity for asinine alliterations (QED!).
Given that simulated responses draw directly on diverse material from a range of (human?) contributors, AI could be accused of plagiarism, as it simply extracts these sources of information and re‑presents them as a rational, objective summary. In terms of credibility, many of the responses make common sense, while others are less believable (see, particularly, the off‑kilter response to Questions #5 and #12).
Each question taken in isolation is one thing but when taken together, the repetitiveness of both content and presentation (and is a dead giveaway that this is not the sort of rational intercourse that would take place between, say, a knowledgeable human interviewer and interviewee. It simply wouldn’t be like that in practice.
Are there any factual errors exposed through this process? Not necessarily (although the reference to older Gibson Les Pauls being made of oak in response to question #12 is peculiar). However, this question does raise the issue of interpretation, i.e. the action of explaining the meaning of something. Inevitably, some perspective may be gleaned from information that is neither technically true nor false, especially where that information is dependent on subjective opinion and/or ambiguity that is difficult to corroborate or prove. The interpretation issue may constrain the ability of AI methodology to explore subject matter diligently and thoroughly in the way a human investigation might. While arguably forensic, it clearly isn’t ‘thoughtful’ in its approach.
The responses generally seem to be ‘playing it safe’, as though AI’s output was written by a committee to iron out any wayward emphases. The sanitised responses may well be useful as a starting point for a novice or someone lacking knowledge about the subject. It doesn’t, however, add anything over and above the basic level of human understanding. AI wouldn’t really impress someone who knows what they are talking about, let alone an expert.
“That’s how it is with people. Nobody cares how it works as long as it works” – The character Councillor Hamann from The Matrix (1999)
AI seems unable to extend a concept beyond the current boundaries of the question. It may be able to develop ‘vision’ at some point but clearly not yet. AI also seems unable to distinguish between poor, acceptable or high quality information – it is innately non‑sceptical of what it is fed with, leading potentially to unreliable outputs. AI currently depends heavily on humans to contribute and moderate content and that is another limitation at the time of writing, perhaps inhibiting its more creative potential. In some ways, AI avoids the question, again, the response to Question #12 doesn’t indicate the range of ROI that one might anticipate from investing.
What the responses do is to focus solely (unnaturally?) on the subject matter without even a hint of the possibility of a wider context. The ‘big picture’ omission struck me throughout the exercise. The current new gear market is strongly oriented – almost obsessively (and irritatingly) so – toward stressing the ‘vintage’ qualities, characteristics and specifications of brand new gear. Many new products are clearly aimed at imitating as closely as possible the idiosyncrasies and technological limitations of the past, frequently as if that is the only game in town. The current new guitar marketplace is not really progressive and, in many cases is clearly regressive. No reference to this marketing incongruity exists in the responses. The vintage past is not actually ‘authentically recreated’ in new products. AI therefore comes across as past‑oriented, not future‑focused.
One of the conundrums with AI at the time of writing is actually how these supposedly intelligible responses were compiled. Presumably, as AI simply mines information originally created by humans (expert or otherwise) in one form or another at some point in time, its generated outputs are not genuinely ‘new’. AI couldn’t possibly conjure a believable level of detail out of an information vacuum, it had to have something from which to start.
The ‘memory’ question is a big issue for AI. When asked basically the same question twice, either consecutively or separated by others, AI will respond to the second question as if the first had not been asked. A human would either, say “I’ve already answered that” or would respond in a slightly different way. AI lacks nuance and is totally oblivious of the regurgitation issue. It seems incapable of a continuing dialogue without tripping up.
The extent to which the human input has been manipulated by AI isn’t readily made clear. One therefore might wonder what was omitted (or added) and what was the result of machine intervention? Also, how did AI decide what should and shouldn’t be processed and the methodology by which it is output? What would AI come up with if it had nothing at all on which to base its algorithmic recipe?
Question – What will happen when AI starts building information based on the output of another AI over several iterations? It would be like a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy, etc. Does the integrity of information degrade significantly as it is repeatedly manipulated such that it bears little or no relationship to the authentic original (i.e. much like artificial Chinese whispers)?
“Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions…” – the character Agent Brown from The Matrix (1999)
Sometimes, less is more and getting something from AI can feel like being bombarded with a relentless barrage of words, rather than selective profound insight (hypocritically guilty as charged!). It is like the difference between learning by rote and repeating facts compared with genuinely understanding a subject matter through critical reasoning, or like reading a dictionary and expecting to comprehend the real world. The responses are more like a pre‑prepared structured lecture based on a text book exemplar, rather than a process of meaningful critical analysis and acute deductive reasoning.
AI is clearly getting a lot closer to human behaviour than simple search results from any standard Internet search engine and it will undoubtedly get better. However, it is not (yet) the last word on the matter. There is something to be gained from the responses, as long as they are taken as one of many inputs into a conclusion, rather than to be taken as a determining factor. My advice, for what it is worth, is to consider what AI presents you with but always take it with a figurative ‘pinch of salt’ (NB. yet another idiom; ‘a grain of salt’, from Pliny the Elder’s ‘Naturalis Historia’, 77CE). A genuine fascination with the subject matter – vintage guitars – is as much about subjective experience as it is about objective black and white bullet point facts. Currently, as far as I’m aware, that degree of authentic articulation of ‘shades of grey’ (i.e. sometimes reality is subtle and complex, and the boundaries are not always clear‑cut) cannot be gained readily from the Internet, AI or no AI.
“The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence” – Aldous Huxley (American author, 1894‑1963)
While the AI processes are undoubtedly impressive, did AI inspire or stimulate curiosity as a skilled mentor might? Categorically not. Did I actually learn anything new about vintage guitars from AI? Nope. But then again, I believe, somewhat conceitedly, that I was already reasonably well informed on the topic.
“AI will be the most transformative technology of the 21st century. It will affect every industry and aspect of our lives” – Jensen Huang of Nvidia Corporation
Final thoughts on AI
In conclusion, I would suggest that AI as it stands, at least on this specific subject matter fails the Turing Test as described at the start of this article. It comes across as ‘artificial’ and the sort of assignment a student might construct from prima facie sources without thought, genuine research, analysis, insight or intellect. The clincher for me was AI’s derivative description of CRAVE Guitars, which isn’t presented as a narrative and not at all how I would (and have) articulated it.
So… Cutting to the chase, how would I rate AI’s responses compared to say, the responses of a specialist to the same questions. Probably, I’d give it about a 5‑6 out of 10 and that is, I think, being generous. AI is leaps and bounds ahead of standard Internet search engine results but still a long way behind what I would expect a rational, knowledgeable human professional to say, not necessarily in terms of what is said but definitely in how it is said. AI could do better (and it definitely will, believe me). It may best be described as ‘work‑in‑progress’.
I posited my starting position at the top of this article, written before embarking on this extravaganza. Reading it again after disembarking, my view has not shifted substantially and I think those eight criteria remain relevant, at least as of March 2024. Perhaps I am falling foul of ‘confirmation bias’, another human flaw. My bad.
Putting it bluntly, AI comes across as having no personality. Some sort of identifiable persona is, I believe, a prerequisite for passing the Turing test. Without a sense of character, AI will always seem a dry, clumsy imitation of an average human. Arguably, AI just wasn’t convincing as being interested in the subject matter. For now, I’ll stick with ‘natural stupidity’, thanks.
Like the character Sarah Connor inaccurately forecast in James Cameron’s 1991 film ‘Terminator 2: Judgment Day’, AI didn’t quite get it right, “Three billion human lives ended on August 29, 1997”. Skynet hasn’t grown up… yet. Thankfully.
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Album of the Month’
I am not going anywhere near the mechanistic and sterile AI for this section of the article. Consequently, I’m going for one of the most organic and natural sounding albums I know (and like). Once again, it is a fairly well‑known recording, so nothing obscure or inaccessible this time around.
Cowboy Junkies – The Trinity Session (1988) – The second album from the Canadian alt‑country band, recorded live in the Church Of The Holy Trinity in Toronto in November 1987 and released in 1988. Its atmospheric beauty is partly due to its imperfections and the natural reverb of the building, all captured by a single microphone. The raw recording was purportedly not adulterated, mixed, overdubbed or edited in any way. Interestingly, the sublime, ‘Blue Moon Revisited (Song For Elvis)’ wasn’t on the original vinyl release. While not to everyone’s tastes (and otherwise probably not normally to mine either), it represents fifty three minutes of exquisite alchemy. It is 100% human in all its gentle, fragile, ragged glory – in a good way. It is hard to envisage AI ever coming up with music like this, now or in the future.
Cowboy Junkies – The Trinity Session (1988)
Tailpiece
Phew! That is way more than enough from me and my erstwhile AI co‑author for now. Please don’t blame me for the majority of this outing, it is mostly down to the synthetic nature of its creation. I must admit that, while a very interesting little (?!?!) project, it was ultimately a bit (?!?!) of a long and arduous slog, bordering on boring (sorry folks). I trust you can discern what was written by me and what was produced by AI.
Finally, a word of sagely counsel. Whatever we do, humanity should always strive to harness the potential of output AI/GAI/AGI for good and to guard against the risks of it being exploited for evil.
I also stated at the beginning that is only Part I of this 3‑part AI adventure! Next month, we’ll take a look at another aspect of AI and vintage guitars. I can tell you are eagerly ‘champing at the bit’ (NB. another human idiom; from ‘Joseph, A Religious Poem’ by the Reverend Charles Lucas, 1810)!
Truth, peace, love, music be with you always. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “Whoever thinks pets are non‑judgemental has clearly never been owned by a cat”
HAPPY & HEALTHY FEBRUARY 2024 GUITAR MUSIC AFICIONADOS. Despite the world collapsing into increasingly dire crises at the behest of inept megalomaniac despots, I will endeavour to deliver some (hopefully) light entertainment as a non‑addictive antidote to the agonising anguish of day‑to‑day survival. As woeful soothsayers may predict, ‘the end of the world is nigh’. For once, they might just be right, at least for human civilisation. Time to repent and plead for redemption at the end of days? I think not. At least not yet. In the meantime… rock till you drop, I say. I digress, as usual. Apologies to one and all.
“Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace” Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama – c.480-400BCE)
Back to the business at hand. Pretentious pedantic prose. OK. Up front, forgive me, for there is an underlying understanding in, and a focus on, the simplicity of the here and now that runs through this article, hence the title. It is a contemplative and reflective narrative that draws on the creative essence of CRAVE Guitars over time.
A little while ago, I was doing some file management on my laptop and I came across a number of old documents that caught my attention. They were basically some very crude design ideas created in a transitional period of CRAVE Guitars’ history between 2007 and 2014.
‘Aha’. Lightbulb moment. The discovery might make a different and, perhaps (?), interesting basis for a matter‑of‑factual monthly musing, I thought. So, without further ado, let’s fire up the metaphorical DeLorean and drift back to 2007 to track the evolution of design elements that developed over a period of seven years and which have been a mainstay of CRAVE Guitars for the last nine years or so. A much shorter missive for you this month, you will probably be pleased to know. Some images too, to brighten up the virtual page.
The dawn of CRAVE Guitars: a reminder – 2007
A quick recap may be in order to provide context. I covered the birth and early years progression of CRAVE Guitars back on its 10th anniversary article in July 2017. There is some inevitable overlap with this article. For those that wish to go into a bit more background detail (opens in a new tab)…
There is, though, a bit more to the design components than I covered at the time. The catalyst for establishing CRAVE Guitars as ‘a thing’ goes back to 2007 and the acquisition of a gorgeous 1989 Gibson Les Paul Custom. While this wasn’t actually a vintage guitar at the time, it had many of the beguiling characteristics that are present on many vintage guitars, including minor bumps, nicks, play wear yellowed binding, and a fading lustre resulting in a fine satin patina. The point of mentioning this here is that this event was the germination of an idea and a facilitator for what would become the CRAVE (Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric) Guitars ‘project’.
1989 Gibson Les Paul Custom
“An idea that is developed and put into action is more important than an idea that exists only as an idea.” Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama – c.480-400BCE)
The original concept is stated on the home page of the web site, “The name ‘CRAVE’ is a play on words; as an acronym, it stands for ‘Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric’ guitars, while its literal meaning is ‘to yearn for’ or ‘to want greatly’. It may also be taken as a ‘call to action’.”
In addition, the six individual constituent words – cool, rare, American, vintage, electric and guitars – became the core criteria for identifying and acquiring instruments (and associated equipment) for the CRAVE Guitars ‘collection’.
Thus… CRAVE Guitars became more than just a vague notion. Sort of. It was shaping up into being ‘a thing’, although I’m still not quite sure what ‘thing’ it has become. However, it exists, whatever ‘it’ is. It struck me as notable how some things come from nowhere and then somehow develop a life of their own, becoming well‑established over time with no or little subsequent change. While the name stuck, the graphic design to support it did not appear fully formed at the time; the current brand image came along much later.
After the summer of 2007, the odd assortment of random guitar gear acquired over many years came under scrutiny and I quickly realised it needed radical rationalisation if it was to comply with the six core criteria of the project. Firstly my non‑American guitars were sold off, then my acoustic guitars and, finally, guitars newer than 1989 were also sold (bar two). What remained formed the basis of CRAVE Guitars as it is now. What was left were about 6‑8 guitars and 2 basses. Since 2007‑ish, all essential acquisitions have complied with the principle mission and entry criteria to create a rationally thought‑through, clearly defined ‘collection’. I don’t like the word ‘collection’ for all its negative connotations but for this exercise, I can’t think of a better one.
From 2007 to about 2010, the focus was on buying familiar classic guitars solely from Gibson and Fender. This reinforced the baseline from which to proceed. It turned out not to be a good time for buying, as it was just before the global financial meltdown of 2008, so vintage guitar prices were sky high. By 2010, the proverbial bubble had well and truly burst. Sigh. It is a good job that CRAVE Guitars is not financially motivated.
2010 to 2014 was a catastrophic period during which I lost almost everything, including my home, so we’ll bypass that quickly without further reference. What’s gone has gone. The subsequent recovery was painful, slow and laborious.
“Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one” Bruce Lee (1940-1973)
Since 2014, CRAVE Guitars has focussed more and more on quirky, unusual and interesting ‘affordable’ vintage guitars from other American manufacturers as well as the Big ‘G’ and ‘F’. It wasn’t until early 2019 that a significant proportion of the pre‑loss ‘collection’ was reunited with newer acquisitions after a friend had kept them safe for several years. Since 2019, CRAVE Guitars has been ‘a thing’ again.
The initial CRAVE Guitars designs – 2008‑2014
At this point, I must state that I am not a graphic designer and have no professional training in the craft, although my family does have artistic roots. I do, however, think I have a reasonably good eye for aesthetics. I might have liked to pursue an education and career in art, photography and design (as well as music) but, like most good citizens, I realised that I had to make a living, so my cultural aspirations were sacrificed at the altar of responsibility and any artistic credentials remain entirely amateur.
As the project grew, I proceeded to develop a Microsoft Access database to record each instrument in some detail. The database has been updated a number of times over the years (see below) and is still in use today.
CRAVE Guitars Database Screen Shots
Photographs of each instrument were taken to add to the database and were used in the early activities. Admittedly, the original photos were limited and not high definition by today’s standard so, from 2014, the guitars were re‑photographed in greater detail and quality.
Using the information from the database, a ‘brochure’ of the ‘collection’ was concocted, such as it was, using the early photographs and a basic narrative. The original Arabic‑style ‘logo’ text was a font used by the CorelDRAW graphics package at the time; unfortunately, I can’t recall the font’s name. The marron and yellow colour scheme was intended (arguably) to convey a sense of classy opulence (!?). I know, I know, the approach was very basic and hardly anything to be proud of now but at least it was a start.
“There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; not going all the way, and not starting” Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama – c.480-400BCE)
CRAVE Guitars Original Logo 2008
However, that is all it was back then; a start. A primitive and very limited run printed pamphlet of some vintage Gibson and Fender guitars from the 1960s to the 1980s inclusive. It was not widely ‘visible/available’ to anyone else who might share my interest, so it was essentially a creative dead end and only of interest in hindsight. It was also a learning exercise. CRAVE Guitars had come a long way, although the evidence may not seem like it.
CRAVE Guitars Catalogue Spread
I suspect that regular readers (if there are any!) will know that I have a principled anathema towards the heinous capitalist practice of accumulating vintage guitars for profit and hoarding them away. This benefits no‑one except the owner’s bank account. I didn’t want to fall foul of that accusation, so I had to find a way of sharing the results of the project with others who have similar interests. It is the sharing element that I feel is important and beneficial.
One way of sharing might have been to become a vintage guitar dealer, like many existing established retail outlets. However, I simply don’t have the ‘killer instinct’ (or the funds) to become a successful hard‑nosed commercial trader, so that option was quickly ruled out. I guess I’m just too nice. Besides, I didn’t have any desire to be like any other businesses. It would be rewarding if I could, in some way, monetize CRAVE Guitars, so that any proceeds could be invested back into the enterprise. However I can’t envisage how that end could be achieved without compromising the principal mission and my own values.
CRAVE Guitars doesn’t have any business premises, so creating some sort of physical curated heritage ‘museum’ (for want of a better word) with only a few average guitars was also out of the question. While I quite like the idea of some sort of unique exhibition, it wasn’t, and still isn’t, feasible. Preliminary research indicated that a gallery or heritage centre wouldn’t attract sufficient visitors to make it worthwhile, so it didn’t even make it to a draft business plan stage.
So, I decided to take the plunge and venture into online sharing. As far as I can tell, there doesn’t seem to be anything quite like CRAVE Guitars out there anywhere. Perhaps it is unique, although I wouldn’t be so arrogant as to assert that particular proposition. It might be exciting to develop some sort of virtual online ‘gallery museum’. However, the technology, for instance pro‑level design software, studio photography, photogrammetry, 3D animation, augmented reality and studio recording, to make it genuinely innovative, immersive and impressive are currently beyond CRAVE Guitars’ modest means. More thought required.
“Design is thinking made visual.” Saul Bass (1920‑1996)
CRAVE Guitars online presence – 2014‑date
In 2014, I had no experience of web site development or running any social media accounts. The emergence of what is recognisably CRAVE Guitars today started in late 2014 culminating with the advent of the CRAVE Guitars web site and social media channels. I was basically starting from scratch but, for me, that was quite ambitious, exciting and frustrating in equal measure.
I had the basic structure of, and a design concept for, a WordPress web site planned out. I went about acquiring the relevant URLs and identifying an ISP (Internet Service Provider) to host the results. A web site without any cohesive design theme would be pretty rubbish, so I had to think of a way of conveying what the entity was and turning that into coherent graphic designs that would become familiar to online visitors.
In addition to the web site, I felt that there would have to be a parallel social media presence, consistent with the aesthetics of the web site where possible. The two leading platforms at the time, Twitter (now Elon Musk’s diabolical ‘X’) and Facebook were priorities. In addition, I had a LinkedIn account, so that also seemed a logical extension. YouTube and Instagram were also popular, so they were other channels to consider. There were/are other social media platforms including Flickr, Pinterest and Tumblr, so I set about making sure that CRAVE Guitars had a presence on all of these (and thereby preventing others from appropriating the name!).
There are some gaps, however. Does anyone remember the social media platform called Google+? I actually liked it but due to inherent security weaknesses, Google shut it down in 2019 and it has become all but forgotten nowadays. I evaluated Snapchat and felt it was irrelevant for CRAVE Guitars. I refuse to use TikTok due to its Chinese ownership, so CRAVE Guitars is not present for ethical geopolitical, environmental, technological and human rights reasons.
Accordingly, the work began in earnest to cultivate the broader CRAVE Guitars ‘brand’ image. Activity on this front was quite significant up until the tempestuous 3‑year hiatus, which took place from November 2020 to September 2023.
“Know well what leads you forward and what holds you back, and choose the path that leads to wisdom” Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama – c.480-400BCE)
The CRAVE Guitars signature image
Determining a signature image for CRAVE Guitars was kinda easy. The sunburst 1975 Gibson Les Paul Standard was one of my original guitars that I bought second hand in c.1978 and have had ever since. It was already a bit battered when I got it, with buckle rash and some parts removed (pickup covers and scratchplate) but it was all I could afford at the time. People pay good money for fake wear and tear like that nowadays and the Les Paul’s attrition was genuine! NB. Relic is not a verb! Ggrr!
Not thinking anything of it at the time, I had the Les Paul refinished from its original tobacco sunburst, which I didn’t really like back then, to a shiny natural finish, which was very popular during the late 1970s. By the 1990s, I was tired of the somewhat bland natural finish, so it was refinished again in a lovely deep cherry sunburst and the missing parts were restored. That is the condition of the Les Paul at the time of writing. Below is the original CRAVE Guitars photograph.
1975 Gibson Les Paul Standard
[Image: 1975 Gibson Les Paul Standard]
Although the Les Paul’s finish isn’t original, it has been a long‑time favourite axe, so it became CRAVE Guitars’ signature instrument, despite rather than because of its chequered history. I don’t give a hoot that self‑opinionated critics pour scorn on Gibson’s 1970s Norlin‑era guitars.
That Les Paul is the only instrument in the ‘collection’ that has been refinished. I don’t do regrets but, if I did, I would feel guilty for messing with that Les Paul like I did. In my defence, I was young and it was only a couple of years old at the time. It was intended to be a working guitar rather than a collectable. Who would have thought that I’d still have it 46 years later and it would be a figurehead for a vintage guitar enterprise! The Les Paul has, though, endured over the years through the few ups and many downs, so it has become appropriately symbolic for both me and for CRAVE Guitars.
The CRAVE Guitars logo and avatar
I couldn’t afford to appoint a professional designer to come up with a ‘corporate’ logo, so I had to attempt something myself. It was these work‑in‑progress attempts that I came across recently and which prompted this article.
The very early efforts comprised a brainstorming‑type design process with some never‑before‑seen aborted concepts. Some of these early rough draft ideas are shown here.
CRAVE Guitars Early Logo Designs #1CRAVE Guitars Early Logo Designs #2
I had an epiphany to combine the signature Gibson Les Paul outline and the word CRAVE into a unified logo. Genius, I thought. The very first attempt at the integrated logo was a rough hand‑drawn scrawl made with a marker pen on a small scrap of (white) paper!
CRAVE Guitars Original Logo Scan
I tested out some of these early ‘sketch’ ideas and the CRAVE acronym with a professional graphic designer friend who I respect. He didn’t like it at all, which was a bit disappointing. However, I persevered, as I thought I was onto something that I could live with.
Crave Guitars Logo Evolution
Once the overall Les Paul shape of the logo was firmed up, I had to choose a colour scheme. It was important to me not to try and be too clever, so it was imperative to Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS). For clarity at different resolutions and sizes, I selected a bright/deep blue for high contrast over a pristine white background. A graphics package was used to scan in and then refine the originally hand‑drawn initial outline.
The ‘bobbly’ lines are intended to give the impression of kinetic resonant vibrations of the instrument. Clever tie‑in huh? OK. Maybe not but that’s what I thought and it seemed eminently logical, so I stuck with it.
Most importantly, the graphic design, narrative and photographic imagery must complement, enhance and not distract from the core subject matter – the vintage guitars, basses, amps and effects – which should be able to shine in their own right. The intention was/is that the various components should all work together in an integrated way, creating a whole that is more than the sum of its parts.
CRAVE Logo Basics
“Simplicity is not the goal. It is the by-product of a good idea and modest expectations.” Paul Rand (1914‑1996)
The admittedly very crude, irregular first attempts were then finessed through about 8‑10 incremental, increasingly subtle, iterations. Eventually, it became what you see on the website, social media, business cards, merchandise, etc. today.
CRAVE Guitars Logo Evolution #2
The guitar‑shaped CRAVE logo image was embellished with the word ‘Guitars’ in a clean, modern and minimalist sans serif Segoe UI Light font, which appealed to my eye. With the recent brand update, the logo’s text was selectively extended to read ‘Vintage Guitars’. This approach could also apply to CRAVE Basses, CRAVE Amps and CRAVE Effects. With or without ‘Vintage’ depending on the circumstance.
CRAVE Guitars Fonts
The full logo, however, wasn’t suitable for social media and Internet browsers, which generally uses round or square‑ish ‘icons’ or ‘avatars’ to represent the image of a relevant account so, once the main logo was firmed up, I set about addressing that particular task. The very first draft avatar was a basic black/red silhouette based on a Gibson ES‑335 body outline but it bore very little resemblance to the rest of the brand, so it didn’t last long.
CRAVE Guitars Avatar #1
The logical answer was to reduce the full logo to fit the avatar’s specification. The result of that exercise was to use only the ‘CR’ from the full logo, intended to represent the shape of the Les Paul body (minus neck/headstock).
CRAVE Guitars Avatar Basics
Recently someone not into guitars asked me what the ‘squiggle’ on Facebook was meant to be and I had to explain it. Never a good sign. I had become so used to it that I thought it was obvious. Obviously not! Once again, there was some disappointment but I can live with it. The ‘CR’ Les Paul body shaped avatar for social media has been retained unchanged.
Crave Guitars Avatar Evolution
“Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works.” Steve Jobs (1955‑2011)
CRAVE Guitars merchandise
The aim behind the CRAVE Guitars graphic design is that it can be used beyond the online presence for instance, printed materials and merchandise. CRAVE merch is there for fun, not money. Routine merch items include T‑shirts, mugs, guitar picks, etc. As CRAVE Guitars is not a business or even a physical entity, there is no pre‑prepared merch stock. It’s all made to order as and when needed. Here are a few examples.
CRAVE Guitars Business CardCRAVE Guitars Guitar Picks
[Image: Business Card]
CRAVE Guitars T-Shirt Designs
CRAVE Guitars future design
Continuity of image is as important as coherence. There are no immediate intentions to change or improve the logo and graphic design. I still believe it to be effective, even though my designer friend still doesn’t like it. The overall aesthetic has been around for ten years now and I think it still looks fresh, clean and modern.
I do review the visuals regularly and think of different ways in which it could be embellished or enhanced but I keep coming back to the basic, simple brand image. Less is more and all that. If it ain’t broke…
At some point, I might want to redesign the brand but not yet. I still like it as it is and it remains visually coherent to my inexpert eye. To change the style radically would, I believe, be counter‑productive and disrupt continuity. Evolution, rather than revolution is likely to be the order of the day, if and when it comes around.
I don’t envisage separate designs for the sub‑brands, CRAVE Basses, CRAVE Amps and CRAVE Effects. They are essentially all under the umbrella of the main brand identity, rather than discrete entities in their own right. They would not exist were it not for CRAVE Guitars. Nor do I envisage any more vintage sub‑brands joining the family any time soon (e.g. drums, keyboards, studio gear, etc.). To diversify further would be to dilute too much.
In the unlikely event that both mankind and I survive until 2027, it will be time to celebrate two decades of CRAVE Guitars. I believe that the design will still be familiar for visitors. Could the CRAVE Vintage Guitars brand design be better? Of course it could.
“Have no fear of perfection. You’ll never reach it.” Salvador Dali (1904‑1989)
I am reluctant to pose the question, ‘what do you think?’, as that would open up a whole can of worms. I see so many logos that are unclear, ambiguous, unrelated to the core business, indistinct, outdated, too detailed, irrelevant, conflicting, poor choice of colours/contrast, overblown, illegible, generic, confusing, ugly, or just plain dull. Simple doesn’t have to be boring. I didn’t set out to create the world’s best logo but, in hindsight, I don’t think it’s too bad. For a rank amateur.
Tantalising snippet… I will return to the subject of the CRAVE Guitars logo in a planned future article. Why? Wait and see!
Final thoughts
One fundamental question for CRAVE Guitars is, ‘Is it worth it?’ I have been doing all of this to share my passion with others but does anyone else actually care or give a damn? It’s also nearly met its demise more than once along the way, so it isn’t a ‘sure thing’. The truth is, I really don’t know what the future holds. I like to think it is a worthwhile adventure but, then again, I am not the one to judge. It is worth it to me.
The website currently gets over 4,000 visitors a month and CRAVE Guitars has over 6,750 followers on X (about 1,000 down from its pre‑hiatus peak) but is that good or not? Again, I have absolutely no idea; they are just numbers. I would hate to think that the last 17 years have been in vain.
A further question is, ‘Why do I do it?’ I have been fascinated by guitars since I got my first nylon‑strung acoustic as a teenager. That fascination prevails to this day. Therefore, I feel quite strongly that CRAVE Vintage Guitars is my ikigai; my purpose in life (from an ancient Japanese philosophy, with ‘iki’ meaning ‘to live’ and ‘gai’ meaning ‘reason’, in rough translation). I have poured my soul into guitars, music and CRAVE Guitars over quite a prolonged period (overall, longer than my entire professional working career, so the effort has been considerable, even though it feels like there is much more to be done before I’m finished (if I live that long!). Is CRAVE Guitars my fate, my destiny? Nah. I wouldn’t go that far; I feel that some decisions are still under my control.
Another profound question is, ‘Where to go from here?’ What is the end game? Well, for that, we’ll just have to wait and see. A great deal depends on currently non‑existent funds. I do not want or intend to give up any time soon; I have become too invested in the project to ‘throw the towel into the ring’ now. I have some thoughts about adding content to the website and some narrative has already been drafted but it is hardly Earth‑shattering. Perhaps a degree of reinvention may be needed after all. I look forward to future developments.
“I never see what has been done; I only see what remains to be done” Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama – c.480-400BCE)
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Album of the Month’
This month, I tried to think of something relevant to the article’s theme. If I had to come up with an album that hints at what CRAVE Vintage Guitars stands for, what on Earth could it possibly be? HHhhmm. Tricky one. Sadly, I no longer have any recordings of my own music, lost in the mists of time, so it has to be an established artist. It has to be predominantly guitar music and it should (?) be a recognisable classic (and from the time of many vintage guitars). HHhhmm. Still tricky. So, so many and yet so few! More HHhhmm. This is hard. Gotta pick something. OK, then, here goes; I wouldn’t call it CRAVE Guitars’ theme tune but I like it anyway…
The Doors – L.A. Woman (1971) No ten‑minute self‑indulgent virtuoso guitar wizard solos here, just solid song writing and shed loads of charisma with guitar playing that serves the songs, rather than vice versa. Guitarist Robby Krieger and his trusty Gibson SG Standard along with Ray Manzarek on keyboards, John Densmore on drums and the tragically mercurial Jim Morrison on vocal chords. The Doors didn’t have a resident bass player but that didn’t hold them back – Jerry Scheff played bass on this album. ‘L.A. Woman’ was the band’s last studio album before Morrison’s untimely death in Paris, France in July 1971, at the age of 27. The recording won’t appear in any ‘top 100 guitar albums’ lists but that’s not really the point. I am personally not a huge fan of The Doors but this record stands out for me. Neither is it universally admired. However, it survived my honing down process until it remained on the shortlist of one at the end.
The Doors – LA Woman (1971)
“Where’s your will to be weird?” Jim Morrison (1943-1971)
HHhhmm. Other worthy (in my view) contenders included, Deep Purple – Made In Japan (1972), Genesis – Selling England By The Pound (1973), Black Sabbath – Black Sabbath (1970), Lynyrd Skynyrd – Second Helping (1974), Pink Floyd – Meddle (1971), Led Zeppelin – Physical Graffiti (1975), T.Rex – Electric Warrior (1971), The Cure – Disintegration (1989), Bob Marley & The Wailers – Live! (1975), Steve Hillage – L (1976), Rory Gallagher – Against The Grain (1975), and David Bowie – Let’s Dance (1983).
One interesting observation; all of the above albums emanated from the 1970s and 1980s. Nothing older and nothing newer. Was it really some sort of ‘golden age’ for guitar music or just the music that impacted an impressionable post‑hippie youth?
Tailpiece
So, there you have it; a much shorter discursive diversion (I had to get at least one alliteration in!) this month and a bit different from most other recent articles. I like to mix things up a bit, so a diversity of subject matter keeps things lively and unpredictable. I’m conjuring up something even more offbeat for next month, if it works! There is, though, a lot to do before we get to that point. Watch this space, folks…
In the meantime, if you get any opportunity at all to help bring common sense to the fore and pre‑empt the impending global apocalypse, just do it!
Truth, peace, love, and guitar music be with you always. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “Since when did the truth become a conspiracy theory?”
WELCOME FAIR MUSIC‑MINDED PATRONS to the first CRAVE Guitars’ monthly article of the New Year. While we may be less than a full month into the year Two Thousand and Twenty Four of the Common Era, one hopes it is off to a good start despite global uncertainty (and insanity). Let us hope that those intent on geopolitical conflict come to their senses, unlikely as it may seem, rather than escalate tensions further. I don’t know about you but I don’t want to be part of the doomsday generation. Scary.
“Bellum omnium contra omnes (the war of all against all)” – Thomas Hobbes (1588‑1679)
Getting back to the musical point, ask pretty much anyone with a slight interest in modern music culture, the question, “Who invented the first bass guitar?” and I’m sure a lot of people would say, “Leo Fender, of course”. Well yes… and no. In the world of vintage guitars, things are rarely quite as straightforward as one may at first think.
With the recent addition of CRAVE Basses to the CRAVE Guitars, Amps and Effects family, this month seems perfectly apt to take a quick look at how the electric bass guitar as we know it came into being and how it has become such an integral component of contemporary music.
Primarily as a guitarist, my dalliances with bass guitars up to now have, I admit, been spawned out of curiosity and exploration, rather than a serious preoccupation. Those dalliances, though, span well over four decades, so the bass encounter isn’t a single, short or recent ‘event’.
We do not start the story, as many might imagine in the 1950s. We’ll come back to that in a little while. Before we get there, though, we should go back quite a few years. Many, many years in fact, starting with the classical orchestral double bass, originating from the 15th Century or thereabouts. Then we’ll explore the modern‑day innovations starting in the 1920s and 1930s before the ‘big bang’ that really exploded in the 1950s and 1960s. Finally we’ll come up‑to‑date, with a look at the instruments, equipment, artists and sounds that have helped to shape the modern musical landscape. Finally, we’ll take a wee peak into the near future of bass instruments.
The fretless acoustic double bass
Before the solid body fretted electric bass guitar, popular music relied almost totally on the acoustic upright double bass for low frequency impact. The instrument’s origins date approximately to the 15th‑16th Century in Venice, Italy. Venetian musician, Silvestro Ganassi developed a ‘bass viola da gamba’ in 1542, widely regarded as the forerunner of today’s double bass. It wasn’t until around 1700, though, that the double bass became part of the opera orchestra. The double bass as we now know it is the largest and lowest‑pitched chordophone in the classical music orchestra.
As a quick recap, defined by the Hornbostel‑Sachs system of musical instrument classification, a chordophone is a musical instrument that makes sound from vibrating one or more taught strings by bowing, plucking or striking the strings. Examples of chordophone types include violins, guitars, and pianos respectively. The word chordophone stems from the Greek words for string (chordē) and sound (phonē).
For more on the historical origins of musical instrument classification (to provide a context for the development of the guitar), see CRAVE Guitars’ March 2018 article.
The traditional 4‑string double bass is usually played in one of two ways, either by rubbing the strings with a bow (arco) or by plucking the strings with fingers (pizzicato). Some modern double bass players, for instance in rock & roll and rockabilly, also use a distinctive ‘slap’ technique. This percussive sound derived from the ‘Bartók pizzicato’ (‘snap’ pizzicato) named after the Hungarian composer and pianist Béla Bartók.
Double Bass (courtesy of Roxanne Minnish)
Depending on the style of music, the double bass is also known by a number of other names, all of which refer to the same instrument. Some of these alternative monikers include bass, upright bass, string bass, acoustic bass, acoustic string bass, contrabass, contrabass viol, bass viol, bass violin, stand‑up bass, bull fiddle, doghouse bass and bass fiddle.
The traditional double bass is a large acoustic fretless instrument of the violin family that is played upright. The deep, resonant, woody tone of the double bass endows it with a very different sound when compared to the modern solid body fretted electric bass guitar. The tuning of the double bass is different from other members of the orchestral sting instruments, in that it is tuned in fourths (E‑A‑D‑G) rather than a violin’s fifths (G‑D‑A‑E). The double bass, then, is tuned the same as a modern bass guitar, an octave below the bottom four strings of a 6‑string guitar in standard tuning. This particular characteristic aided the bass’s transition from classical to modern day musical styles.
Originally, double basses were more likely to have three strings until four strings became commonplace by the 19th Century, by which time the standard format and construction of the double bass had become established. There are, however, 5 and 6 (or more) string variants and there are also various alternative tunings.
The double bass has been the mainstay of orchestral string sections and chamber music for several centuries in one form or another. It was predictable that, with the emergence and evolution of the major modern popular music genres, such as jazz, blues and country & western that the double bass would become the go‑to bass instrument, at least up until the 1960s when the solid body fretted electric bass guitar became predominant. However, the double bass hasn’t disappeared from contemporary music completely. Plenty of present‑day artists still use or revert back to the double bass for authenticity and/or effect.
The main drawback experienced by many players is that the double bass is a substantial piece of equipment. The full‑size double bass is almost 75 inches (190cm) tall, weighing in at c.20‑25lbs (9‑11½kg), without its hefty case. The scale length is set at around 42” (107cm), much longer than most modern bass guitars. Given these dimensions, the double bass is sizeable, cumbersome, unwieldy and plain heavy, making it far from the easiest of instruments to move around or play. There are smaller double basses including ¾, ½ and ¼ size, mainly aimed at younger players. Even so, the double bass not for the faint hearted, as the smallest ¼ size instrument is still over 61” (156cm) tall.
Another drawback is the double bass’s acoustic construction. Like the acoustic guitar, in the first half of the 20th Century, the acoustic double bass’s lack of volume made it hard to be heard in a jazz‑era big band mix unless there was some form of electrification through either a magnetic pickup or a microphone connected to an amplifier and, even then, acoustic instruments can be prone to feedback in high sound pressure level environments.
Traditional double basses are not only large but, because of their construction, they are also quite expensive, making them a major investment and therefore difficult for novices or younger players to access and learn.
Even so, despite its limitations, during the 20th Century the double bass became widely used in a diverse range of modern music genres, including jazz, blues, swing, rock & roll, rockabilly, country & western, bluegrass, folk, funk, reggae, metal, rock, pop, tango and visual media soundtracks.
Trivia: Believe it or not, there is an even larger bass, first built c.1850 by the French luthier Jean‑Baptiste Vuillaume (1798‑1875) in Paris. The octobass, as it is called, has three strings and is basically a larger version of the double bass tuned a further octave down. The octobass is a truly gargantuan beast, approximately 137” high (348cm).
The electric upright bass
To enable modern players to experience the spirit of the acoustic double bass in a more convenient and amplified form, there is the modern Electric Upright Bass (EUB), which is also played, as its name suggests, upright, like a traditional double bass.
EUBs allow for greater portability while retaining the playing style and general sound of its forebear. As the EUB doesn’t require the substantial acoustic resonating chamber of a double bass, they often feature a ‘skeleton’ body, making it much smaller, lighter and cheaper to produce. The minimal structure may have either a solid body or a small acoustic body.
A magnetic, piezo or condenser bass pickup provides the means to route the signal via a bass amplifier to loudspeakers. Like a double bass, the EUB’s strings can be bowed or plucked, although that is dependent on fingerboard and bridge radius. While evoking its acoustic origins, the structural and electric characteristics of the EUB endow it with a unique sound all of its own.
As the EUB’s construction isn’t bound by convention like its orchestral sibling, the flexible format allows for a range of scale lengths to be employed from around 30” (76cm), through 34” (86cm) like a long scale bass guitar to the full 42” (107cm) of a double bass, making it much more accessible to a range of players. Almost all EUB necks allow for a full two‑octave range and most but not all are fretless. Compared to the double bass or the electric bass guitar, the electric upright bass tends to be a modern, notable but relatively niche instrument. There are EUB models at all price points, making it easier for novices and experienced players alike.
The first production electric upright basses were developed independently in the mid‑1930s by Regal (Electrified Double Bass), Vega (Electric Bass Viol), Rickenbacker (Electro Bass‑Viol) and Audiovox (bull fiddle – see below). Gibson introduced their special order Electric Bass Guitar in 1938, which was still an upright fretless instrument with a hollow body and a magnetic pickup.
Manufacturers of electric upright basses include Framus, Ampeg, Warwick, Ibanez, Yamaha, Palatino, NS Design (Ned Steinberger), and Harley Benton.
Electric Upright Bass
The first solid‑body fretted electric bass guitar
As hinted at above, while Leo Fender was the major innovator associated with the solid‑body fretted electric bass guitar, he wasn’t the first. He was beaten to the starting post by at least some 15 years. Hardly a photo finish!
The first indication of the possible future of a bass guitar was in 1924 when the legendary Gibson designer, Lloyd Loar came up with a prototype electric bass. The Loar concept focused on the body, pickup and strings but with little additional detail. Loar’s radical design was rejected by Gibson management at the time. Loar left Gibson shortly thereafter in 1924, so his visionary ideas for an electric bass guitar went no further.
Nearly a decade later, around 1933, American musician and inventor Paul H. ‘Bud’ Tutmarc (1896‑1972), based in Seattle, Washington, began experimenting with reducing the size of the double bass to a more manageable instrument. Tutmarc originally devised an electrified fretless double bass‑style instrument described as an electric 4‑string upright ‘bull fiddle’, slightly smaller than a cello.
It’s worth a quick diversion to go back in time to take in an original report from the ‘Seattle Post‑Intelligencer’ newspaper, which published the story on 17 February 1935. The headline read, “Pity Him No More – New Type Bull Fiddle Devised.”
The article went on to state that, “People have always pitied the poor bass-fiddler… who has to lug his big bull-fiddle home through the dark streets after the theatre closes. But he doesn’t have to do it anymore. Because Paul Tutmarc, Seattle music teacher and KOMO radio artist, has invented an electric bull-fiddle. One you can carry under your arm. And it doesn’t even need a bow, either. You pluck a string – and out of the electric amplifier comes a rich, deep tone, sustained as if five or six bass violinists were bowing five or six bass‑violins with masterly artistry. The tone is sustained as long as you want it, too, without a bow.” The instrument described in the article was a cello‑like upright fretless instrument with an electromagnetic pickup.
Tutmarc was, however, about to do something far more radical. By 1935-1936, Tutmarc, had changed direction and developed the first solid body fretted electric bass guitar, pretty much recognisable in its modern form. It was this version of Tutmarc’s bass that was intended to be played horizontally, rather than upright, in a similar way to the modern bass guitar. The 1935 sales catalogue for Tutmarc’s company Audiovox featured his ‘Model 736 Bass Fiddle’, a solid‑bodied electric bass guitar with four strings, a fretted neck, with a 30½” (775mm) scale length, an ebony (or purpleheart) fingerboard with 16 frets, a black walnut body, a hidden single Tutmarc‑Stimpson horseshoe pickup below a mirror-steel faceplate, and a single volume control.
Tutmarc AudioVox Model 736
In addition, as an electric bass guitar would be pretty much useless without the means to amplify the sound, Audiovox also sold an accompanying ‘Model 936’ bass amplifier with 18 watts of power and a 12” Jensen Concert speaker.
Around 100 of the Model 736 Audiovox bass guitars were made in the mid‑1930s. However, there are only thought to be three Model 736 Tutmarc bass guitars still in existence today, making them remarkably rare. One belongs to the Experience Music Project (EMP), now known as The Museum of Pop Culture (MoPOP), a non‑profit enterprise founded by Microsoft co‑founder Paul Allen in 2000 and based in Seattle, Washington state, USA. In 2018, a 1936 Audiovox Model 736 bass guitar was reportedly sold by Tutmarc’s grandson on eBay for $23,850.
Sadly, for Tutmarc, the Audiovox 736 was not a commercial success. The price tag was high for the mid‑1930s, in a country still severely affected by The Great Depression (1929‑1939). The 736 bass fiddle originally cost $65 and the matching 936 bass amplifier cost $75, placing it well out of reach for many musicians. The high price and the radical concept didn’t attract enough musicians at the time and it wasn’t long before it was discontinued and was subsequently forlornly forgotten to history. Tutmarc’s company, Audiovox folded in 1950.
It can well be argued that Tutmarc was ahead of his time. Perhaps it is a case of supply looking for a demand that consumers didn’t know they needed. Maybe it was bad timing and/or bad luck. The Model 736 also arrived shortly before the outbreak of World War II when the guitar manufacturing industry was deemed ‘non‑essential’ and resources were diverted to the American war effort. Furthermore, a bass guitar didn’t seem to fit seamlessly into any of the prevailing musical styles at that time.
It is surprising, though, that such a significant innovation in guitar history isn’t more widely known about. Perhaps it is time, nay overdue, for Tutmarc’s milestone achievements to be deservedly recognised.
One company, Luthiery Laboratories, makes modern‑day replicas of the Audiovox 736, keeping the spirit of the original instrument alive.
The first commercially successful mass produced solid body fretted electric bass guitar
And so it was that the scene was set for someone else to step in and make the bass guitar ‘a thing’. That someone else was Clarence Leonidas Fender (1909‑1991). Unlike poor old Paul H. Tutmarc, you may just have heard of him.
“I wonder if I could make an electric bass” – Leo Fender (1909‑1991)
For more on the history and development of Fender guitars and musical equipment, see CRAVE Guitars’ August 2018 article for the context behind Fender solid body electric guitars.
Once the proverbial ball started rolling, the bass guitar had a phenomenal, transformative and relatively rapid impact on modern music that cannot be underestimated or understated. It is also very easy to take the electric bass guitar’s presence on stages, in studios and bedrooms all around the world for granted. Back in 1950, though, no‑one other than a select few in Fullerton, California had any idea of what was to come.
So… what are we actually talking about? The answer, after the lengthy preamble (apologies for keeping you on tenterhooks for so long), is the mighty Fender Precision Bass. Three little words. Game changing, era defining and well‑deserving of all the hyperbole attached to it over the past seven‑plus decades. So much has been written about the Precision that there is little need to dredge up the detail again, so what follows is a brief overview.
Leo Fender was working on a prototype back in 1950, bringing the world’s first commercially successful mass‑produced electric bass guitar to market in 1951. Fender designed the Precision Bass (often shortened these days to P‑Bass) to overcome the many drawbacks of the acoustic double bass alluded to earlier in this article. Even the name, Precision, referred to the fretted neck to enable musicians to play in tune far more precisely than on the double bass’s fretless neck. Conservative double bass players may well have looked at the Precision Bass in the same way that conservative guitarists looked at the Fender Telecaster, which had been introduced a year earlier in 1950. Consternation and indignation were probably natural initial reactions from the ‘old‑school’.
At its most basic, the Fender Precision Bass is a solid body, 4‑string bass guitar equipped with a single pickup and a one‑piece 20‑fret maple neck with rosewood or maple fingerboard. It all sounds so very straightforward and unremarkable nowadays doesn’t it?
The Precision Bass didn’t, however, appear fully formed. The original design of the Precision borrowed several design features from the Telecaster guitar, other than the double cutaway body. Initial models carried one single coil pickup, a slab body, large scratchplate and a Tele‑like headstock.
After Fender introduced the Stratocaster guitar in 1954, some of its design features were brought over to the Precision including a contoured body and a Strat‑like headstock. The original pickup was replaced with a single split coil hum cancelling staggered design and a sleeker redesigned scratchplate. It is this version of the Precision from 1957 that has stayed in production largely unchanged to the current day. There have been many, many variants with numerous changes in specification over the years, including a fretless version (ironically, given the origin and intention of the Precision’s name). 5‑string versions, 22‑fret necks, active electronics, multiple pickups, etc. followed.
The original pre‑1957 Precision design has been re-issued by Fender at times over the years, often called the Telecaster Bass to differentiate it from the post‑1957 Precision specification.
The popularity of the Fender Precision Bass grew significantly throughout the 1950s especially with rock & roll and country fraternities, as well as with session musicians. During the 1960s the solid body fretted electric bass guitar became dominant in most modern musical genres. During the early days, there wasn’t a great deal of choice in terms of alternatives to the Precision but that was to change later on.
1977 Fender Precision Fretless Bass
Fender capitalised on their supremacy by introducing the solid body fretted electric Fender Jazz Bass in 1960 (originally called the ‘Deluxe Model’). The svelte Fender Jazz Bass (often now shortened to J‑Bass) was designed to appeal to a different customer base. Like the offset bodied Fender Jazzmaster guitar, it was aimed squarely at the dyed‑in‑the‑wool jazz community. However, like the Jazzmaster, the Jazz Bass’s appeal spread far wider than jazz musicians. Like the Precision, the Jazz Bass has rightly become an iconic industry standard solid body electric bass guitar.
Throughout the years, both the Precision and Jazz Bass have featured sizeable chrome covers over the pickup and the bridge, despite these items limiting playing techniques such as palm muting the strings. As the covers are purely aesthetic, rather than functional components, it is fair to say that the vast majority of musicians removed these covers permanently.
Without doubt, the Fender Precision Bass and its younger sibling the Jazz Bass are icons of contemporary music and remain hugely popular today. Consumers can purchase genuine P‑Bass and J‑Bass models from the budget Fender‑owned offshore‑produced Squier brand, through Mexican and American‑made Fender models, to the high‑end Fender Custom Shop versions. Throughout the decades, the Precision and Jazz Bass models have oft been imitated and/or blatantly copied by other manufacturers, eager to cash in on Fender’s industry‑dominant status.
Understandably, over the years, the Precision and Jazz Bass have become highly collectable, especially the earliest models. The highest vintage market prices undoubtedly belong to the models from 1951 (Precision) and 1960 (Jazz Bass) to 1965, when Leo Fender sold his company to industry giant CBS. Fender equipment from this period is known as ‘pre‑CBS’.
For more information on the Fender Precision and Jazz Bass, just complete any Internet browser search and, alongside a great deal of drivel, there is a massive volume of fact and opinion available, often described in forensic detail.
1989 Fender Jazz Bass American Standard Longhorn
Evolution of the electric bass guitar
It is probably fair to say that, since 1951 and the introduction of the Fender Precision Bass, other brands were in the position of having to play catch up. In particular, Fender’s biggest competitor, Gibson, was wrong‑footed and they have never been able to compete on a level playing field. In 1953, Gibson released the EB‑1, which was a violin‑shaped solid mahogany body bass with a set neck. The EB‑1 didn’t catch on and was replaced by the semi‑acoustic ES‑335‑shaped EB‑2 in 1958, the SG‑shaped Gibson EB‑0 in 1959 and the EB‑3 (made famous by Jack Bruce of Cream) in 1961. While the semi‑acoustic EB‑2 proved popular, its Epiphone‑branded counterpart, the Epiphone Rivoli proved more successful. All these early Gibson basses used a shorter 30½” scale. In 1959, Gibson also released a hollow body EB‑6 6‑string bass.
Possibly Gibson’s best contender for an iconic bass guitar is the Gibson Thunderbird, originally introduced in 1963. The Thunderbird was based on Gibson’s Firebird guitar, designed by legendary American car designer Raymond Dietrich (1894‑1980). The Thunderbird was the first Gibson solid body bass to use the 34” scale made popular by Fender. Like the Firebird, the Thunderbird was redesigned in a simpler ‘non‑reverse’ form for 1966 and the original ‘reverse’ shape wasn’t reissued until the mid‑1970s. During the 1970s, Gibson also released the Ripper and Grabber basses but neither really captured bass players’ imaginations (or their precious dollars!). Later additions like the Gibson Triumph, Victory and RD basses didn’t fare much better as viable competition for Fender’s stalwarts. Epiphone have Thunderbird and EB basses in their line‑up alongside Epiphone‑specific basses such as the Newport and the Embassy.
Over at Danelectro in Neptune, New Jersey, Nathan Daniel launched the world’s first 6‑string bass, the UB‑2 in 1956 comprising a single cutaway semi‑hollow bass with a 30” scale, 24 frets and dual single coil pickups, earning its nickname the ‘Tic Tac bass’. In 1958, Danelectro replaced the UB‑2 with two new 6‑string bass models. The first was the Long Horn 4623 bass with a radical new lyre‑like design 24 frets, and a short 25” scale. The other was the Short Horn 3612 with stubby double cutaways, 29½”scale and only 15 frets. All Danelectro models substantially undercut the retail prices of both Fender and Gibson’s basses. The 6‑string models seemed to attract guitarists rather than bass players to their designs, providing a novel bridge between guitar and bass camps.
It should be noted at this point that older 6‑string basses are generally tuned an octave below a guitar in standard tuning, to E-E, while the baritone guitars that were appearing at the time were tuned either to B‑B or A‑A. On the other hand, modern 5‑string basses simply add a lower B string while modern 6‑string basses tend to add lower B and higher C strings compared to an equivalent 4‑string bass. Confused?
Meanwhile, back in the 1960s, Fender weren’t resting on their laurels. Following the popularity of the ‘student’ Mustang guitar, Fender introduced the short scale Mustang Bass in 1966. The Mustang Bass spawned two later variants, the Bronco Bass (introduced in 1967) and the Musicmaster Bass (introduced in 1971). Fender also released two esoteric ‘bass’ guitars, the Fender Bass V (introduced in 1965), which was the world’s first 5‑string bass guitar and the 6‑string Bass VI (introduced in 1961). The latter was strongly influenced by the Fender Jaguar guitar design. The Bass VI was Fender’s upmarket response to the Danelectro 6‑string bass introduced 5 years earlier. The Bass VI is unique in having 3 pickups, 6 lighter gauge strings, a short 30” scale, a floating bridge and a mechanical vibrato as used on the Jazzmaster/Jaguar guitars, as well as a removable string mute. To compete with the Gibson EB‑2 and Epiphone Rivoli thinline semi‑acoustic basses, Fender introduced the hollow Coronado Bass in 1966.
In addition, the ‘other’ Californian company, Rickenbacker, run by F.C. Hall at the time, also wasn’t going to be left on the side‑lines in the bass department. Rickenbacker had hired Roger Rossmeisl (1927‑1979) who designed the brand’s key guitars and the 4000 series basses. The Rickenbacker 4000 bass with its distinctive cresting wave body outline and thru‑neck construction was launched in 1957. Subsequent models were named 4001, 4002, 4003, 4004, all being variants of the same basic instrument. There isn’t enough space to go into the specification differences here.
Rickenbacker 4001
A decade after Leo Fender left the company that still carries his name today, Music Man was formed in California and released Leo Fender’s vision for the next evolution of his era defining bass guitars. The Music Man Stingray Bass was released in 1976 with a single large bridge humbucker, distinctive 3+1 headstock, innovative on‑board active electronics and an integral string mute. While Music Man’s guitars never caught on at the time, the Stingray Bass has joined Fender and Rickenbacker as an iconic design for many bass musicians. The Stingray Bass was especially popular for funk slap‑style bass technique for the likes of Louis Johnson of the Brothers Johnson.
1978 Music Man Stingray Bass
There are a few other notable basses, such as the German Höfner ‘violin bass’, the 500/1, made famous by Paul McCartney of The Beatles. This model, introduced in 1955, with its carved solid spruce top and humbucking pickups, is often nicknamed the ‘Beatle Bass’. Beyond the Beatles connection, though, the 500/1 remains a relatively minor entry in the bass stakes, while the company’s only other notable entry being the Höfner Club and Verythin basses.
Another oddity to mention at this point is the Swedish Hagström H8, unique for being the world’s first mass‑produced 8‑string bass, with four pairs of strings on a short 30” scale. The H8 was only produced briefly from 1967‑1969.
Throughout the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s a plethora of other companies jumped on the bandwagon, eager to make the most of the massive increase in demand as rock, pop and other genres proliferated. Many of the basses produced during this time were flagrant facsimiles of the best‑selling American brand models, often by Japanese companies (now termed ‘lawsuit‑era’ copies). Other companies like Warwick in Germany were making their own headway with their successful original‑design Thumb and Streamer basses.
Today (2024), Fender arguably still rules the roost with basses covering all bases (sic!) from budget to elite models. All other brands stand firmly in Fender’s enviable shadow. While Fender may dominate, there are now plenty of alternative options. There are some incredible bass guitars out there, some of which are listed later in this article for those that want to diverge from the predictable industry standard ‘Fender sound’. There are numerous ways to deviate from the common path, with different brands, string/pickup configurations, electronics, scale lengths, body construction, etc. The quality of budget instruments is vastly superior to anything available in the past and provides a strong basis (again, sic!) for players seeking to learn and develop their skills.
The acoustic bass guitar
While the solid body electric bass guitar finally took the world by storm from the 1950s and 1960s, the acoustic bass guitar has proved to be another modern, notable and niche instrument. The first (largely unsuccessful) attempts at acoustic bass guitars began to appear in the 1950s as a logical extension to its electric counterpart.
Historically, one of the earliest acoustic bass‑like instruments was the Mexican guitarrón, which has its roots in the 16th Century and is widely used in Mexican Mariachi bands. While looking similar to a guitar, these huge instruments were either 6‑string or 12‑string acoustic instruments, tuned in A‑D‑G‑C‑E‑A.
In 1972, Ernie Ball introduced the Earthwood acoustic bass guitar, stating that “…if there were electric bass guitars to go with electric guitars then you ought to have acoustic basses to go with acoustic guitars.” A simple yet ‘blindingly obvious’ observation, given the benefit of hindsight. Ernie Ball took a guitarrón, being the nearest thing to an existing acoustic bass guitar, and created a more practical instrument for guitar‑centric American consumers. The Earthwood was relatively short‑lived but the foundation of the acoustic bass guitar was established. American company Washburn took the concept and created more successful instruments that coincided neatly with MTV’s Unplugged concert series (1989‑1999). Interestingly, despite starting it all, Ernie Ball does not have an acoustic bass guitar available to buy at the time of writing.
Acoustic bass guitar construction is essentially similar to the steel‑strung flat top acoustic folk guitar, with a larger hollow wooden body and a longer scale neck. Most acoustic basses have four strings, tuned in the same way as an electric bass, E‑A‑D‑G, an octave below a standard guitar. The majority of acoustic basses have fretted fingerboards, although some are fretless.
Acoustic Bass Guitar
Like many modern day acoustic guitars, many acoustic bass models have pickups to enable them to be amplified for stage use or DI’d for recording purposes. Some instruments are thinline electric semi‑acoustic basses while others are full‑depth electro‑acoustic basses. These are designed primarily as acoustic basses with an on‑board pickup for additional amplification when needed.
Today, there are any number of acoustic bass guitars on the market for every level of player and every price point from many key manufacturers including, amongst others; Martin, Taylor, Guild, Fender, Takamine, Ovation, Tanglewood, Epiphone, Warwick, Epiphone, Washburn, Godin, ESP, Breedlove, Larivée, Framus, Hohner, Ozark, Dean, D’Angelico, Ibanez, Sigma, Alvarez and Cort.
Bass guitar amplification
In the early days of bass guitars, brands released bass amplifiers to accompany their instruments, often sold as a package (see Tutmarc’s Audiovox above, for example). Other brands like Rickenbacker did the same in the early days. The main difference between guitar amps and bass amps is that the latter are tuned specifically to reproduce bass frequencies accurately. A standard 4‑string bass guitar produces low frequencies in the range 41Hz to 100Hz with overtones extending up to 4‑5kHz (not dissimilar to an acoustic double bass in fact).
In terms of sound pressure levels, bass frequencies need more power to be heard by the human ear/brain at the same volume as higher frequencies, so bass amps tend to have higher power ratings than guitar amps. In the past, speakers for bass also tended to be larger with 12”, 15” or even 18” to shift the amount of air needed at lower frequencies. In contrast, guitar speakers tended to be 10”or 12”. Bass speaker cabinets, especially those with multiple speakers, normally had sealed or ported enclosures to increase volume. For all these reasons bass amplifiers and speaker cabinets tend to be different to their guitar equivalents.
Probably the most famous brand associated specifically for its bass amplification is the American company Ampeg, founded in 1946 and now under the ownership of Japanese giant, Yamaha. Ampeg started out attempting to amplify the acoustic double bass in 1949 by using a microphone/pickup in the instrument’s stand. The ‘Amplified Peg’ as it was called was then shortened to ‘Ampeg’ and the rest, as they say, is history. Their most famous range of amps was the 300W Ampeg SVT from 1969 and their bass combo amps, the B‑15 from 1960, as used by the likes of Motown session bass player James Jamerson.
It was no surprise that Fender, the leader in the world of bass guitars from the 1950s should also produce bass amps/cabs. Perhaps the most famous Fender bass amp was the Bassman from 1952 onwards, first introduced as a combo valve amp with a 15” speaker. The most desirable though, was the Dual Rectifier Bassman valve combo with 4×10” speakers. From 1960. Fender also released a ‘piggy back’ amp head and speaker cabinet design to cope with higher power levels and to provide flexibility. From 2000, Fender released a solid state version of the legendary Bassman amp. The original valve Bassman also became beloved by many guitar players for its tone, for instance by the late blues rock guitarist, Stevie Ray Vaughan (SRV).
Student bass players also needed a bass amp. So Fender introduced the Musicmaster Bass amplifier in 1970, as a companion to the Fender Musicmaster Bass guitar. The Musicmaster Bass combo amp was a very simple affair with one channel, 12W of power, volume and tone controls and a single 12″ Fender speaker. Like the Bassman, it has latterly been enjoying a bit of a revival as a budget vintage amp for guitarists. The Musicmaster Bass amp was discontinued in 1982 after the introduction of the Fender Studio Bass combo and Japanese Fender Sidekick Bass 30. Nowadays, the extensive Fender Rumble series has proved very popular with bass players.
Legendary British amplifier company Marshall was not going to be left behind. Marshall’s first 100‑watt bass head was the JTM 45/100 / JTM 45 Super 100 model. Another, also dating from the second half of the 1960s, is the JMP #1992 Super Bass 100 (100W) and JMP #1986 Bass (50W). Like the Fender Bassman, the Marshall Super Bass 100W also proved popular with guitarists. Bass players were also known to use the Marshall #1963 Super PA (50W) and Marshall #1968 Super PA (100W) amps.
Another legendary British amplifier company, VOX produced bass versions of its AC‑15 and AC‑30 combo amps. These were followed in 1963 by the VOX T‑60 and Foundation amps, the latter promoted by Bill Wyman of the Rolling Stones.
German acoustic amp company AER also produce a range of bass amps, particularly well‑suited to amplifying acoustic and electro‑acoustic bass guitars.
Bass guitarists turn out to be a little less conservative than their guitarist counterparts, especially when it comes to amplification and speaker cabinets. For instance there are plenty of modern‑day bass amps that use efficient solid state D‑class amplification (a type of amplifier that uses digital switching technology to amplify audio signals efficiently), with very high power ratings – 500W and 600W or more being not uncommon. Bass amps often also make wide use of sophisticated on‑board EQ. Speaker cabinet configurations also tend to be more versatile with reflex ports, horns, tweeters and combining multiple speaker types being common.
There are many other valve, solid state or hybrid bass amplifier manufacturers not mentioned above, including Trace Elliot, Ashdown Engineering, Mesa/Boogie, Peavey, Music Man, Hiwatt, Laney, Sound City, H/H, WEM, Hartke and Orange.
Bass guitar effects
Things have changed a great deal over the decades since 1951. In the early days of the solid body electric bass guitar, most players plugged straight into their amps without much in the way of tone augmentation.
By the 1970s and 1980s bass players had a paucity of effects specially designed for their instruments, so they generally adopted guitar effects with just a few bass‑specific pedals to choose from. Since the industry started to migrate to digital technology from the 1980s onwards, the major effect companies began to produce pedals designed primarily for use with bass guitars. Now, in the 2020s, there is plenty of choice with most of the big players in the effect industry now making bass‑specific effect pedals, including Electro‑Harmonix, MXR, BOSS, Ibanez, Fender, Laney and Ampeg.
In addition, from around the start of the new millennium, a number of manufacturers turned their ideas for integrated multi‑effect units into practical musicians’ tools that became popular for both guitar and bass, including BOSS, VOX, Zoom, Tech 21, Behringer and Valeton.
In 1998, Line 6 introduced a ground‑breaking innovation called the POD, which put many guitar effects, amps and cabinet emulations into a single portable unit. While the little red kidney shaped POD was initially directed at guitarists, the rack mounted Line 6 POD Pro models came in both guitar and bass versions. Since then, Line 6 and other manufacturers now combine guitar and bass amp/effect/cabinet emulations into a single unit. These units are constantly improving and are gradually replacing stage backlines with direct input (DI) into PAs/monitors, as well as into studio desks/DAWs. Along with the POD, Line 6, also now part of Yamaha, is still in the same business with their extensive Helix range.
Alternatives to the Line 6 POD and Helix units include the Axe-Fx III from Fractal Audio, which is a pro‑level amplification/effects processor suitable for both guitar and bass. Meanwhile, Kemper Amps took a slightly different route with their Profiler, which has all‑in‑one effects, amplifier and speaker cabinet profiles designed for both guitar and bass.
Just to finish off, there are numerous boutique effect pedal manufacturers that produce stomp boxes, often to very high degrees of quality, including brands such as Way Huge, TC Electronic, EarthQuaker Devices, Darkglass, Aguilar, Origin Effects, Free The Tone, Providence, Source Audio, Walrus Audio, ZVEX, Mooer Audio, Sansamp, Digitech, Eventide, Strymon, JHS, Keeley and Empress Effects.
Iconic (and other) bass guitars
The next sentence is likely to be highly provocative and intentionally so. While there are innumerable bass guitar models out there from 1951 to the current day, there are probably only four bass guitar models that can truly be called iconic (i.e. something that is widely considered to epitomize an era, culture, community or place). The four key instruments – none of which are based on guitar equivalents – that stand head and shoulders above the rest are:
Truly iconic bass guitars: Fender Precision Bass (1951‑date) Fender Jazz Bass (1960‑date) Rickenbacker 4000 series (1957‑date) Music Man Stingray Bass (1976‑date)
In addition, below are listed just a very few of the other great electric bass guitars manufactured from 1951 onwards. This is far from a comprehensive list and is intended only to be broadly indicative of the type.
Gibson bass guitars: Gibson EB series Gibson Thunderbird Gibson Explorer Bass Gibson Melody Maker Bass Gibson Grabber/Ripper/G3 Gibson RD series Gibson Triumph Gibson Victory Gibson 20/20 Bass
Epiphone bass guitars (not including Epiphone versions of Gibson basses): Epiphone Embassy Epiphone Newport Epiphone Rivoli Epiphone Viola
Other American brand bass guitars: Alembic Series 1/2 Ampeg Dan Armstrong Lucite Ampeg AEB-1 BC Rich Eagle BC Rich Mockingbird BC Rich Warlock Danelectro Longhorn 4623 Danelectro Shorthorn 3612 G&L JB2 G&L L1000/L2000 Gretsch 6071/6072 Gretsch G2220 Junior Jet Gretsch 5440 Electromatic Guild B-301/B-302 Guild Starfire Harmony H22 Harmony H27 Jackson JS Kramer 450-B/650-B Kramer DMZ Lakland Skyline Music Man Sabre Music Man Sterling National Val Pro Model 85 Ovation Magnum Peavey T-40 Peavey Millennium/Milestone PRS SE Kestrel/Kingfisher Schecter Omen Schecter Stilletto Silvertone 1440 series Steinberger Spirit XT Steinberger Synapse Supro Pocket Travis Bean TB2000 Washburn Taurus
European bass guitars: Burns Sonic Hagström H8 Höfner Club Höfner HCT-500/1 Höfner President Hohner B2 Hohner The Jack VOX Clubman VOX Cougar VOX Phantom 4 VOX Sidewinder VOX VBW Teardrop Bass Wal Mk1/Mk2 Warwick Thumb/Streamer/Infinity/Corvette Warwick Rockbass
Japanese bass guitars: Other than perhaps the Yamaha BB and TRBX series, and the Ibanez SR and TMB series, Japanese bass guitars do not have the same level of brand/model heritage when compared to those produced by American and European companies. There are, however, many Japanese basses produced by companies such as Ibanez, Tokai, Greco, Jedson, Westone, Teisco, ESP/LTD, Fernandes and Aria.
“Without the Fender bass, there’d be no rock n’ roll or no Motown. The electric guitar had been waiting ’round since 1939 for a nice partner to come along. It became an electric rhythm section, and that changed everything.” – Quincy Jones (1933‑)
Famous bass players
Below are listed seventy of the world’s most famous and influential bass players – alive and departed – including upright double bass and electric solid body bass guitar players. There are, of course, many, many more but this is an indicative list for those interested in exploring some of the music created by these diverse musicians (in alphabetical order):
Aston ‘Family Man’ Barrett (Bob Marley & The Wailers) Walter Becker (Steely Dan) Andy Bell (Oasis) Bill Black (Elvis Presley) Jack Bruce (Cream) Cliff Burton (Metallica) Geezer Butler (Black Sabbath) John Cale (Velvet Underground) Stanley Clarke (Return To Forever, solo) Adam Clayton (U2) Bootsy Collins (James Brown, Parliament/Funkadelic) Tim Commerford (Rage Against The Machine/Audioslave) Billy Cox (Jimi Hendrix) John Deacon (Queen) Kim Deal (Pixies, Breeders) Willie Dixon Gail Ann Dorsey (David Bowie) Bernard Edwards (Chic) John Entwistle (The Who) Flea (a.k.a. Michael Peter Balzary – Red Hot Chili Peppers) Bruce Foxton (The Jam) Simon Gallup (The Cure) Roger Glover (Deep Purple) Kim Gordon (Sonic Youth) Larry Graham (Sly & The Family Stone) Marshall Grant (Johnny Cash) Steve Harris (Iron Maiden) Dusty Hill (ZZ Top) Peter Hook (Joy Division, New Order, The Light) Glenn Hughes (Deep Purple) Jah Wobble (a.k.a. John Joseph Wardle) James Jamerson (session musician) Louis Johnson (The Brothers Johnson) John Paul Jones (Led Zeppelin) Carol Kaye (session musician) Lemmy Kilmister (Hawkwind, Motörhead) Mark King (Level 42) Alan Lancaster (Status Quo) Geddy Lee (Rush) Phil Lesh (Grateful Dead) Tony Levin (Peter Gabriel) Jenny Lee Lindberg (Warpaint) Phil Lynott (Thin Lizzy) Glen Matlock (Sex Pistols) Paul McCartney (The Beatles, Wings, solo) Duff McKagan (Guns N’ Roses) John McVie (Fleetwood Mac) Marcus Miller (Miles Davis, Herbie Hancock, George Benson) Charles Mingus Krist Novoselic (Nirvana) Pino Palladino (session musician) Jaco Pastorius (Weather Report) Guy Pratt (Madonna, David Gilmour) Suzi Quatro Dee Dee Ramone (Ramones) Noel Redding (Jimi Hendrix) Mike Rutherford (Genesis) Robbie Shakespeare (Sly & Robbie) Billy Sheehan (Steve Vai, David Lee Roth) Gene Simmons (KISS) Nikki Sixx (a.k.a. Frank Carlton Serafino Feranna Jr. – Mötley Crüe) Chris Squire (Yes) Sting (a.k.a. Gordon Sumner – The Police) Danny Thompson (John Martyn) Thundercat (a.k.a. Stephen Lee Bruner) Robert Trujillo (Metallica) Sid Vicious (a.k.a. Simon John Ritchie – Sex Pistols) Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) Tina Weymouth (Talking Heads, Tom Tom Club) Tal Wilkenfeld (Jeff Beck, Prince) Bill Wyman (Rolling Stones, Bill Wyman’s Rhythm Kings)
“The gunk takes the funk” – James Jamerson (1936‑1983)
Bass in the (near) future
It is difficult for, and unfair of, me as a guitarist, to predict any sort of unified future for the bass guitar but I’ll give it a shot.
The traditional conservative brigade will still stick to tried and tested instruments and equipment. Musicians looking for something a bit different will probably want to experiment with the format, for instance number of strings, scale lengths, pickups and electronics. If anything there will be more radical and custom bass guitar designs from up‑market and boutique luthiers that diverge from the traditional archetype set by Fender over 70 years ago. Many additions to the form extend the flexibility of the core instrument, so it may be a case of further evolution, rather than revolution.
Bass amplification will continue to diverge from its simple valve origins and continue to embrace the digital realm, probably dispensing with backline amps/cabs altogether with signals being DI’d into desks/PA/monitors.
While bass players haven’t been particularly well served in the past for bass‑specific effect pedals, I anticipate that bass effects will achieve greater representation, including some out‑there effects not currently available to guitar players.
Bass guitar players have struggled to compete, with synthesisers dominating the world of modern electronica, dance and popular music. At least, for now (thankfully), the bass guitar remains essential to most guitar‑based music in a sort of symbiotic, co‑dependent relationship. As long as guitars keep going, so will bass, and vice versa. Bass players, being ever inventive individuals, will adapt and cultivate new ways to keep the instrument relevant, current and in the limelight for decades to come.
Technique‑wise, there will continue to be the traditional approaches towards walking bass lines, typically using the fundamental root/fifth styles that has been the general mainstay of modern music for decades. In contrast, there will be many more amazing virtuoso bass players who see the versatility and potential of the instrument in its own right.
So, other than tangible incremental progress around the margins, there is probably not a whole lot that will change profoundly in the near future. I may be wrong with that last sentence. In many ways, I hope so!
Interestingly, while the upright double bass continues to appear in modern music from time to time, the solid body fretted electric bass hasn’t really made any headway into the clique of conservative classical orchestral music, which still relies heavily on the traditional, some may say archaic, acoustic upright double bass.
Resources
Periodicals dedicated to bass guitar may be the best place to keep up‑to‑date with the technology and equipment associated with the instrument. Publications include Bass Musician Magazine, Bass Player Guitar Magazine, Bass Guitar Magazine, Bass Magazine, Bass Musician and Bass Gear Magazine.
Online resources include Music Radar, TalkBass.com, Basschat and No Treble. There are also many books on bass guitars and bass playing techniques, including the inevitable, ‘Bass Guitar For Dummies’.
As far as purchasing bass guitars, there are the large Internet sites, brick & mortar retailers and the usual online sites, Reverb.com and eBay. For vintage and rare bass guitars, there are outlets purely for basses including (in the UK) Andy Baxter Bass, The Bass Gallery, The Bass Centre, Vintage Bass Room and ClassicandcoolGuitars.
Some final thoughts
I certainly learnt a lot from researching and writing this article. At first sight, there may seem to be quite a bit of relevant information on the Internet. It is only when one starts to dig deeper and attempt to put something together that makes some form of sense that things rapidly become unclear. All of a sudden, much of the available information seems incomplete, contradictory, vague and/or outright erroneous. In the end, it comes down to evidence and corroboration but sorting the wheat from the chaff isn’t always easy. It seems that online information about vintage guitars is far more reliable than that about vintage basses. There are far too many poorly informed people who invent facts and present opinion as truth.
Despite my best attempts to piece things together, I may have fallen foul of the same issues raised above. However, I have tried very hard not to fill in gaps with assumptions and/or fiction. While I endeavour to be thorough and rigorous, my approach isn’t academic and I don’t have the time, funds or energy to provide the last word in scholarly fact. The contents herein should therefore probably not be relied upon too heavily. This article should, for that reason alone, be regarded as my best intention to balance fact with entertainment.
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama – c.480‑400BCE)
This is just the sort of article that would benefit greatly from images to illustrate and break up the narrative. Sadly as a (broke) not‑for‑profit entity, I cannot afford the costly copyright/royalties charged for the use of relevant images, so I have had to rely on very limited free/public domain resources or my own photographs. I apologise for the thousands of words used to describe what images could do in none. Once again, no AI was used in the research and writing of this tome – only my own hard work.
NB. Apologies to anyone disappointed by the wait for a cheap, clichéd joke at the expense of ‘the bass player’! T’ain’t gonna happen here. Love ‘the bass player’.
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Album of the Month’
Given that this month’s article focuses on the fascinating history of the bass guitar, it seems only fitting to select an album that demonstrates the virtuoso bass playing of one of the greatest bass guitarists of all time, Jaco Pastorius (1951‑1987) and his famous modified fretless Fender Jazz Bass.
Weather Report – Heavy Weather (1977) – The seventh and most commercially successful studio album by the American jazz fusion band. ‘Heavy Weather’ was the first album with Pastorius on full‑time bass duties. The smooth jazz funk production of the album, which was released at the peak of the punk rock movement in the US and UK, stood in stark contrast to the otherwise brutal sounds of the late 1970s. Given that it sold in huge numbers (and still does) is testament to the composition and musicianship on display. Initial sales were about 500,000 and total sales to‑date are over 1.06 million. Other Weather Report albums may be ‘better’ according to purists but this is the one I heard first and it has stuck with me over the years.
Weather Report – Heavy Weather (1977)
To me, this album hit me right between the eyes about what virtuoso bass playing can be like. There are many, many other artists and albums that could arguably take the acclaim, for instance Stanley Clarke’s successful solo album, ‘School Days’ (1976), but on this occasion, the late, great Jaco (& co.) takes the accolade, such as it is.
“I’m the greatest bass player in the world” – Jaco Pastorius (1951‑1987)
Tailpiece
Well, there you go. I think that most of us love a bit of decent low bass in our music. I hope y’all got something out of this fleeting exploration into the defining instruments, artists and music of the lower registers. I think the narrative works well as a complement to the launch of CRAVE Basses at the end of 2023, but that’s just my (obviously biased) opinion.
I hope you feel inclined to come back next month to see what’s currently fermenting in the CRAVE guitars’ secret brewery.
Truth, peace, love, and guitar music be with you always. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “Mundanity is the devourer of lost dreams”
GOOD DAY’S SALUTATIONS and seasonal best wishes to all you good folks out there in music land. Welcome to vintage gear aficionados and greetings to the conclusion of the year, two thousand and twenty three. There is no point in, and no good will come from, re‑hashing the journey over CRAVE Guitars’ 3‑year hiatus once again, so it is now officially behind us and a thing of the past. Gone. However, there may be merit in looking briefly at what CRAVE Guitars actually got up to behind the scenes during that time. It is the end of the year, so it’s kinda traditional for review anyway, as has been the practice in years past. This review, though, isn’t a single year but three years in retrospect. As it transpires, less has happened in those three years than would normally have occurred in one year prior to 2020’s global meltdown. Perhaps that is just as well. If the previous trend had continued unabated, CRAVE Guitars would have run out of space and funds a long time ago. I guess that there are silver linings at the end of the tunnel after all (I really must stop playing with mixed metaphors! Bad CRAVE!).
Well, there is no point in perpetuating petty procrastination, so let’s proceed with some prosaic pontification (nothing like a bit of CRAVE’s addictive affinity for asinine alliteration, again!). All text and images copyright of CRAVE Guitars. No AI used here.
‘New’ old gear over the past 3 years
The volume of acquisitions may not be great but the choices, I believe aren’t too shabby. I aim for variety and novelty in my quest for something a wee bit different to the norm, at least as far as the guitars are concerned. Here, there are two are from the 1960s, two from the 1970s and one from the 1980s. The effects are slightly more numerous and there is a little bit of gap‑filling going on here but variety is again a factor. Only 3 out of the 11 stomp boxes are ‘Made in USA’. Interesting. Right, here is the short shortlist…
Guitars and basses (5):
1963 Danelectro Pro 1 1989 Fender Jazz Bass American Standard Longhorn 1978 Fender Musicmaster Bass 1979 Gibson Explorer E2 1964 National Glenwood 95
Effect pedals (11):
1985 BOSS HM-2 Heavy Metal (distortion) 1984 BOSS SD-1 Super Over Drive 1979 BOSS SG-1 Slow Gear (auto swell) 1974 Colorsound Supa Tone Bender (fuzz) 1970s Colorsound Supa Wah-Swell 1970s DOD Analog Delay 680 (echo) 1980s Dunlop Original Cry Baby GCB-95 Wah 1970s Electro-Harmonix Switch Blade Channel Selector (A‑B switch) 1981 Ibanez CP-835 Compressor II 1984 Ibanez SM9 Super Metal (distortion) 1989 Marshall The Guv’nor (overdrive/distortion)
Over the last three years, there haven’t been any ‘new’ vintage valve amps. This is mainly due to space restrictions and the responsibility for maintaining these delicate electrical artefacts. They weren’t delicate when originally manufactured, they were built to go on the road and put up with punishment. However, after 60 or 70 years, they tend to get a bit temperamental. A bit like humans in fact. The last amp that joined the family was the fantastic little 1973 Fender Princeton Reverb ‘silverface’. Possibly my favourite amp.
There has been one notable departure from the CRAVE Guitars family. I was looking around for a Gibson Explorer E2 to partner the Gibson Flying V2. However, I couldn’t really justify yet another Explorer. Then, someone contacted me out of the blue enquiring about the black 1984 Gibson Explorer. If there was one guitar that I would let go to trade up, that was the one. It can be really strange how opportunity can present itself as coincidence. Eventually, deals were agreed and one came in while one went out. Serendipity and status quo. Result! I hope the 1984 Explorer is in a happy place.
Let’s take a closer look at the ‘new’ guitars – all of them exhibiting unusual construction and specification, making them exceptionally cool and rare (in my opinion). Right, here is the long shortlist…
1963 Danelectro Pro 1 – I first saw one of these a few years ago and was struck by its utter simplicity and quirky charm. Nothing fancy going on here. It is diminutive, dinky and hyper cute. It is, however not very practical. It has a short scale and upper fret access is awkward and only one pickup will limit it for some. However, it has all the usual Danelectro traits, including the unique construction and that classic lipstick pickup. It is definitely not everyone’s cup of tea but, for me, that’s a good reason to dig it. It is a genuinely unique instrument and SO cool that it hurts. It’s great fun to play too.
1989 Fender Jazz BassAmerican Standard Longhorn – I have long wanted a Fender Jazz Bass. The new CRAVE Basses has allowed me to indulge that luxury. However, this isn’t a Jazz Bass as you know it and definitely not in the long tradition of the J‑Bass. This lovely beast is a Longhorn, only made for five years, this one from the first year of production. The deep cutaways and 22 fret neck make it look, feel, play and sound different from a ‘normal’ Jazz Bass. The Longhorn nickname gained it an altogether humorously crude moniker of the ‘boner’ bass. Now this one lives with me, I actually now prefer the look of this unusual instrument over the one that defined the icon.
1978 Fender Musicmaster Bass – Another oddity and one of the ‘lost Fenders’. After the success of the Mustang Bass, Fender went on to release an even simpler budget model. The Musicmaster has the Mustang’s short scale but the pickup is actually a 6‑pole Mustang guitar pickup. The overall design and specification certainly alienated a whole bunch of players but that kind of misses the point. Snobs. Take the bass purely on face value and it’s actually a decent ‘student’ bass with great build quality and that offset body look that is currently very popular. Not one for the traditionalist. Note: Since the feature and photos were published, the original 2‑saddle bridge has been reinstated.
1979 Gibson Explorer E2 – Some people hate the Gibson Flying V2 and Explorer E2. I love them because of their unusual multi‑layered construction. As mentioned above, finding an E2 was a mission. Moreover, this one belonged to the lead singer of the band Go West, Peter Cox. Kudos and thanks Peter. I don’t usually go for provenance but in this case, it adds something significant to the guitar’s backstory. It’s the walnut‑faced model (some are maple‑faced) and in wonderful near‑original condition. While it’s not quite as whacky as the admittedly peculiar V2, it has plenty of character and charisma. The Gibson Explorer, I think, remains my overall favourite guitar model.
1964 National Glenwood 95 – Here’s a glorious instrument with another unusual type of construction. The body is moulded fibreglass, what the makers, Valco, called Res‑O‑Glas. I was expecting the material to be thin and plasticky. Instead, it is quite thick and solid. The two halves are screwed together leaving the interior hollow. It is very unique and an awesome entry in vintage guitar history. Not only is it well built, it is visually striking in just about every way. Whatever part you look at or whatever angle it is viewed from, it is a startlingly beautiful creation. Neither is it a case of style over substance, it plays very well and with an inimitable sound. I could go on and on but I’ll let it speak for itself.
… and, now moving on to the ‘new’ vintage effect pedals:
1985 BOSS HM-2 Heavy Metal – A pedal renowned for creating a whole heavy metal sub‑genre thanks to Swedish death metal band Entombed and their debut studio album, ‘Left Hand Path’ (1990). Not many stomp boxes can claim that distinction. It is a monster. This one also comes with its original box and documentation. Very cool.
1984 BOSS SD-1 Super Over Drive – Considered by many as a classic in the BOSS overdrive tradition. The SD‑1 adds a Tone control to the existing BOSS OD‑1 Over Drive to give it more flexibility and to help BOSS compete with other brands’ overdrive pedals. The SD‑1 has been seen on pedalboards all over the world for decades, earning it its enviable reputation.
1979 BOSS SG-1 Slow Gear – This is one of the rarest, most collectable and misunderstood BOSS stomp boxes. The name gives nothing away. It acts a bit like a noise gate in reverse, the filter creating an auto swell effect. It is quite unique. After much experimentation, there is really only one sweet spot so, to be honest, sadly, it is a bit of a one‑trick pony, albeit an exclusive one.
1974 Colorsound Supa Tone Bender – The Supa Tone Bender is basically just a big box version of the original Colorsound fuzz. There is no room in this article to dive into the nerd zone and cover its origins or its similarities/differences to other models. The numerous gear obsessives out there will tell you at great length about all the geeky differences. Basically, it’s a great 1970s fuzz pedal. What more do you need to know?
1970s Colorsound Supa Wah-Swell – Another over‑sized ‘Supa’ version of a standard combination wah‑wah and swell pedal with a footswitch to go from one mode to the other. There’s very little on the inside other than empty space, indicating that the old marketing ploys of ‘more is more’ and ‘bigger is better’ played a part here. 1970s pedalboards weren’t as crowded as they are today, so pedals like this gained bragging rights. I can’t date this one accurately.
1970s DOD Analog Delay 680 – Here is a truly wonderful 1970s American echo pedal. It’s not quite up with the benchmark Electro‑Harmonix Deluxe Memory Man but it is still authentic and very musical. I love these old analogue delays. It’s great fun to use and sounds great. It may not be in great cosmetic condition on the outside but few are because they were well used, an indication of what really matters to working musicians.
1980s Dunlop Original Cry Baby GCB-95 Wah – Probably one of the most iconic wah‑wah pedals of all time. This one is a straightforward model from the 1980s. As classic as they come, you know exactly what you are going to get. The model has probably been used by most of the great guitarists at some point during their careers. The pot is a bit scratchy but I can’t bear to replace it, so it’s still original.
1970s Electro-Harmonix Switch Blade Channel Selector – Strictly this is not an effect, just an A‑B switch. Another ‘no bones’ pedal with nothing much inside the box. It has one input and two outputs (or vice versa if you wish). Not massively useful or flexible but it does what it needs to do in a simple set up. Typical 1970s EHX styling to boot.
1981 Ibanez CP-835 Compressor II – A pedal in the classic ‘square switch’ ‘0’‑series Ibanez effect pedal series (as is the most desirable TS‑808 Tube Screamer). The CD‑835 (catchy name, that. Not) is a perfectly capable pedalboard compressor. I still prefer the basic MXR Dyna Comp but this one will appeal to others. This one comes with its original box and documentation.
1984 Ibanez SM9 Super Metal – Part of Ibanez’s ‘9’‑series, the SM9 is a massively beefed up Ibanez TS9 Tube Screamer but without the reputation of the latter, so it is a bit of a dark horse. Much more flexible and with a greater range of sounds available. It is a bit fiddly to recreate just the right tone but it is worth the effort involved in getting it tuned in. How far do you want to go? Pretty colour too.
1989 Marshall The Guv’nor – Way, way before the current fad of putting a guitar pre‑amp on a pedal board, Marshall basically came up with the idea back in the 1980s. For those wanting classic Marshall tones without a 100W head and two 4×12 cabs stacked as they should be, there is The Guv’nor. For a large box full of transistors, rather than baking hot valves, it does an impressive job. Not necessarily accurate but great distortion on tap nevertheless. This is the original ‘Made in England’ version, complete with its box.
There you have it, a brief rundown of 3 years’ collecting cool and rare vintage guitar gear in the background. Not a great deal to show for 36 months in terms of quantity but a nice range of quality. I am completely out of both storage space and funds, so any progress will be slow and steady for a while.
CRAVE Guitars’ website
The superficial sheen of the website hasn’t really changed much at all. However, there are technical changes beneath the surface that will hopefully keep it up‑to‑date and relevant. I’m no techno whizz, so CRAVE Guitars doesn’t appear on the prized ‘first page of Google’. Still, seeing as it is not a commercial enterprise, I’m not overly bothered. Overall viewing figures though have continued to increase year‑on‑year over the last seven years, even through the hiatus, which is a promising sign.
The web site’s beneath‑the‑radar positioning hasn’t stopped all the typical spammers inundating CRAVE’s e‑mail box with the usual promotional BS. It is absolutely clear that they don’t do their research, so every single one them gets summarily blocked and deleted without exception. I do, however, welcome genuine communications via the website, so long as they are sincere.
The biggest ‘news’ on the website is the addition of the all‑new CRAVE Basses pages. The web site originally started out just as CRAVE Guitars almost a decade ago now. Then it expanded to include CRAVE Effects and CRAVE Amps a few years ago, so CRAVE Basses is a logical extension. Even though I’m primarily a guitarist, I like the occasional dabble with the lower frequencies. The new sections of the website include features on CRAVE’s four vintage basses, as well as additions to the galleries.
The two ‘new’ CRAVE Basses covered above join a pair of existing vintage basses that I’ve owned since the 1970s…
Before Covid, the number of visitors to the site was steadily increasing and reaching peaks that I could only have dreamt about when I started. During Covid, things slowed dramatically, indicating that people, rightfully, had other things on their minds. This slow‑down was mirrored by consumer’s overall demand in the music equipment industry. Even after Covid, things have been slow. The so‑called cost‑of‑living‑crisis (thanks Putin et al), especially in the UK has hit most people (including me) hard and visits dropped right down to pre‑2020 levels. Other priorities rightly prevailed once again. Despite being generally subdued, visits seem to be gradually increasing again but it is way too early to call it a trend.
I actually have quite a bit more content already written for the site that I will get around to publishing at some point. It’s not super critical but it seems a shame not to use it.
CRAVE Guitars’ (un)social media
I really don’t have the resilience to return to social media to the same level as in the past. However, CRAVE Guitars is posting things irregularly on Musky old X (ex‑Twatter), Facebook and LinkedIn. I can’t respond to messages but I do review them every so often. That will have to do for now. My engagement with social media is not negotiable for now.
CRAVE Guitars’ database
There is not really a great deal to say about this other than I use it to catalogue all of CRAVE’s vintage guitars in some detail. In the case of catastrophe such as fire, flood, theft, cat, etc., at least the information should be safe and sound. A copy is saved in the cloud just in case the laptop goes the same way.
CRAVE Guitars Database
Brand augmentation
No, I’m not getting bigger brands for all you fetishists out there. CRAVE Guitars has been around since 2007. The short name is OK but it isn’t specific enough to identify that vintage guitars are the focus of the ‘brand’. The full name of CRAVE (Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric) Guitars is certainly specific enough although it is a bit of a mouthful when it comes to everyday use. Internet SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) also has some difficulty placing the CRAVE Guitars brand in the vintage guitar category. Type ‘CRAVE guitars’ into a search engine and the site appears straight away. Type in ‘vintage guitars’ and the site may eventually appear plenty of pages down.
So… In addition to the established short and full names used above, I will also be using the name CRAVE Vintage Guitars to help searchers and visitors to get a better understanding of what this strange entity is all about. It is a small but important change. It will take search engines a while to pick up on it but it might help people find the site. Future CRAVE Guitars merchandise is also likely to carry the updated branding as and when needed. As ‘they’ say, it does what it says on the tin (apart from the amps, effects and basses of course. Doh!).
Musical history update
It’s a while since the 14‑part CRAVE Guitars’ series of articles, ‘The Story of Modern Music in 1,500+ Facts’, culminated in May 2020. Sadly, we have lost far too many great music people since I published the last of the ‘Facts’ just 2½ years ago.
The inevitability of life is that it ends. RIP great men and women. This list picks up from where that last article on the subject left off. Here are just a few of them.
Day
Month
Year
Music Fact
4
June
2020
English bass guitarist, singer and founding member of glam pop/rock band The Sweet, Steve Priest died at the age of 72.
18
June
2020
English singer, songwriter and entertainer, nicknamed ‘The Forces’ Sweetheart’ during WWII, Dame Vera Lynn died at the age of 103.
6
July
2020
Italian composer, conductor and musician, who wrote hundreds of cinema and television scores, Ennio Morricone died of complications after breaking a leg in Rome at the age of 91.
13
January
2021
American guitarist with rock band New York Dolls, Sylvain Sylvain, died after a two-and-a-half year battle with cancer in Nashville, Tennessee at the age of 69.
17
February
2021
Jamaican vocalist and pioneer of reggae ‘toasting’ U‑Roy (Ewart Beckford) died from complications following surgery in Kingston, Jamaica at the age of 78.
2
March
2021
Jamaican singer, songwriter, percussionist and original member of The Wailers alongside Bob Marley and Peter Tosh, Bunny Wailer died from complications following a stroke in Kingston, Jamaica at the age of 73.
28
July
2021
American bass guitarist and long-term member of southern blues/rock band ZZ Top, Dusty Hill died at his home in Houston, Texas, at the age of 72.
13
August
2021
Celebrated American folk singer, guitarist, and songwriter Nanci Griffith died in Nashville, Tennessee at the age of 68.
24
August
2021
English drummer with rock band the Rolling Stones for over five decades, Charlie Watts died in hospital in London at the age of 80.
29
August
2021
Legendary Jamaican reggae and dub producer and recording artist, Lee “Scratch” Perry died of an undisclosed illness in hospital in Lucea, Jamaica at the age of 85.
26
September
2021
English bass guitarist and founding member of pop/rock band Status Quo from 1967-1985, Alan Lancaster died from complications of multiple sclerosis in Sydney, Australia at the age of 72.
8
December
2021
Jamaican bass guitarist and record producer, Robbie Shakespeare, best known as half of the reggae duo Sly & Robbie, died following kidney surgery in Miami, Florida at the age of 68.
10
December
2021
American singer, guitarist and songwriter with TV pop band, the Monkees, Michael Nesmith died from heart failure at his home in Carmel Valley, California at the age of 78.
7
January
2022
Canadian musician, singer, songwriter, and producer for Motown Records, R. Dean Taylor died at his home having contracted COVID‑19 (coronavirus) at the age of 82.
9
January
2022
American jazz and R&B musician, songwriter, producer, and radio personality James Mtume died in South Orange, New Jersey at the age of 76.
12
January
2022
American singer, co-founder and member the Ronettes, nicknamed the ‘bad girl of rock and roll’, Ronnie Spector died from cancer in Danbury, Connecticut at the age of 78.
20
January
2022
American singer and actor Michael Lee Aday, better known as Meat Loaf, died from Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome in Nashville at the age of 74.
19
February
2022
English singer/songwriter, keyboard player and founder of the rock band Procol Harum, Gary Brooker MBE died from cancer at his home in Surrey at the age of 76.
22
February
2022
American singer/songwriter who worked with Isobel Campbell and Queens Of The Stone Age, in addition to a lengthy solo career, Mark Lanegan died at his home in Killarney, Kerry, Ireland at the age of 57.
25
March
2022
American rock drummer of the Foo Fighters, Taylor Hawkins died of heart failure probably caused by a drug overdose in a hotel in Bogota, Colombia at the age of 50.
4
April
2022
American guitarist and member of Motown Records’ in‑house studio band, the Funk Brothers, Joe Messina died from kidney disease in Northville, Michigan at the age of 93.
26
April
2022
German electronic music innovator, producer, composer and former member of krautrock band Tangerine Dream, as well as solo artist, Klaus Schulze died following a long illness at the age of 74.
17
May
2022
Academy Award-winning Greek musician, composer and producer Evángelos Odysséas Papathanassíou, better known as Vangelis died of heart failure in Paris at the age of 79.
26
May
2022
English keyboard player, DJ and founding member of electronica band Depeche Mode, Andrew Fletcher died of an aortic dissection at his home at the age of 60.
9
June
2022
American singer known for her collaborations with film director David Lynch, Julee Cruise committed suicide in Pittsfield, Massachusetts at the age of 65.
8
August
2022
British Australian singer and actress Olivia Newton-John died from breast cancer in Santa Ynez Valley, California at the age of 73.
28
September
2022
American rapper Artis Leon Ivey Jr., a.k.a. Coolio died from a heart attack caused by a drug overdose in Los Angeles, California at the age of 59.
4
October
2022
Highly acclaimed American country music singer and songwriter Loretta Lynn died from natural causes in Hurricane Mills, Tennessee at the age of 90.
28
October
2022
American rock ‘n’ roll pianist singer and songwriter, Jerry Lee Lewis died from natural causes in DeSoto County, Mississippi at the age of 87.
10
November
2022
English musician and key member of space rock band Hawkwind, Nik Turner died from unknown causes at the age of 82.
21
November
2022
English guitarist, singer, songwriter and one‑time member of pub rock band Dr. Feelgood, Wilko Johnson died from pancreatic cancer in Southend‑on‑Sea, England at the age of 75.
30
November
2022
English musician, singer and member of Fleetwood Mac, Christine McVie died of Ischemic stroke and metastatic cancer in London, England at the age of 79.
4
December
2022
German musician, composer, member of Ash Ra Tempel and solo artist, Manuel Göttsching died from natural causes in Berlin at the age of 70.
11
December
2022
Acclaimed American composer of film and TV scores, Angelo Badalamenti died from natural causes in Lincoln Park, New Jersey at the age of 85.
18
December
2022
English musician, singer and member of The Specials and Fun Boy Three, Terry Hall died from pancreatic cancer at the age of 63.
23
December
2022
British musician, rapper, singer, songwriter and DJ, front man of electronic band Faithless, Maxi Jazz (Maxwell Fraser) died from undisclosed causes in London England at the age of 65.
10
January
2023
English virtuoso guitarist and former member of the Yardbirds, Jeff Beck died from bacterial meningitis in East Sussex, England at the age of 78.
18
January
2023
Legendary American guitarist and singer, member of The Byrds and CSNY, David Crosby died from COVID-19 (coronavirus) in Santa Ynez, California at the age of 81.
28
January
2023
American singer, songwriter and guitarist with alternative rock band Television, Tom Verlaine died from prostate cancer in Manhattan, NYC at the age of 73.
8
March
2023
Legendary American composer, songwriter, producer and pianist, Burt Bacharach died from natural causes in Los Angeles, California at the age of 94,
5
March
2023
American guitarist and founding member of southern rock band Lynyrd Skynyrd, Gary Rossington died from undisclosed causes in Milton, Georgia, USA, at the age of 71.
12
April
2023
Influential Jamaican dub reggae sound system and record label owner, renowned for his work in London, Jah Shaka died at the age of 75.
1
May
2023
Canadian singer, songwriter and guitarist Gordon Lightfoot died from natural causes in Toronto at the age of 84.
24
May
2023
English bass player and member of post‑punk alternative rock band The Smiths, Andy Rourke died from pancreatic cancer in New York City at the age of 59.
25
May
2023
The Queen of Rock ‘n’ Roll, American singer, songwriter and actress Tina Turner died after a long illness in Küsnacht, Switzerland at the age of 83.
6
June
2023
English guitarist, singer and founder of blues/rock band Groundhogs, Tony McPhee died from complications after a fall and a stroke at the age of 79.
20
June
2023
English guitarist with rock group The Pop Group, John Waddington died from undisclosed causes at the age of 63.
21
July
2023
Legendary American jazz and popular music crooner Tony Bennett died from Alzheimer’s disease in New York City at the age of 96.
26
July
2023
American musician, singer, songwriter, and founding member of the Eagles, Randy Meisner died from COPD in Los Angeles, California at the age of 77.
26
July
2023
Irish singer, songwriter and activist Sinéad O’Connor died from unknown causes in London, England at the age of 56.
9
August
2023
Canadian musician and guitarist for Bob Dylan and The Band, Robbie Robertson died from prostate cancer in Los Angeles, California at the age of 80.
24
August
2023
Renowned English rock guitarist with Whitesnake and UFO, Bernie Marsden died from bacterial meningitis at the age of 72.
27
August
2023
American musician best known for being one half of electronica duo Stars Of The Lid, Brian McBride died from undisclosed causes at the age of 53.
13
September
2023
British singer, songwriter and musician Roger Whittaker died from a stroke in France at the age of 87.
30
November
2023
British‑born Irish singer, songwriter, musician and frontman with Celtic punk rock band the Pogues, Shane MacGowan died from pneumonia and encephalitis in Dublin, Ireland at the age of 65.
5
December
2023
English guitarist and founding member of The Moody Blues and Wings, Denny Laine died from lung disease at the age of 79.
Music industry opinion
A lot has (or rather hasn’t) happened in the music industry over the 3 years since CRAVE Guitars suspended its main activities. First, there was the hangover from global economic recession/depression, then the coronageddon, then the cataclysmic geopolitical conflicts adversely affecting far too many innocent peoples around the globe. At best, the music industry at all levels could only hope to hold its own.
In reality, it has been a tumultuous few years, to say the least. Everyone from equipment manufacturers (including their supply chains), venues, artists, music recording and distribution, publicity and management have been hit hard. Every conceivable facet of the market has been decimated. While I haven’t been able to keep up with events in the industry as I normally would have done, it is clear that things are only now just beginning to get back to 2019 levels.
Who would have predicted three years ago, for instance, that British amp stalwart Marshall would have been acquired by the Swedish digital music company, Zound Industries. A sign of the times, I guess.
Strategically, it has been a nightmare where even the best scenario planning has failed to predict wildly off kilter outcomes. Vintage guitar prices seem to have kept up as the super‑rich collectors are basically unaffected by economic blips that are savage to the rest of us. I know that I am paying more now than I would have done in 2019 for the same thing. While I am not economically motivated and CRAVE Vintage Guitars is a non‑profit enterprise, it is a relief that the 3‑year hiatus hasn’t totally wiped out the value of CRAVE Guitars’ precious artefacts.
It will take a long time for things to settle down and start to grow again. It will be a challenge for everyone involved for some time to come. The last three years haven’t signalled the death throes of the guitar music community. Yet. It has, however been badly wounded, let us hope not mortally so.
The guitar book
A while back, I was contacted out of the blue by a book publisher wanting to use one of CRAVE Guitars’ vintage guitars in their author’s new book on the subject. After a bit of formal toing‑and‑froing, it all went ahead and the book was published earlier this year. I was happy to do this for no commercial gain and the only reward was a shiny copy of the final print version and a credit in the acknowledgement section. While it won’t make CRAVE Guitars famous, I am quite proud of this minor morsel of exposure and recognition.
The book in question is, ‘Guitar: The Shape Of Sound – 100 Iconic Designs’ by author Ultan Guilfoyle, published by Phaidon Press (ISBN: 978 183866 558 6) (2023).
The vintage guitar that was featured in the book is my lovely 1974 Ovation Breadwinner 1251 (see page 204‑205).
CRAVE Guitars Ovation Breadwinner
The pulp novel
As you may know, I have been writing on and off for some time, going back to the dim dark origins of CRAVE Guitars back in 2007. The main examples of this are the web site features and monthly articles on the CRAVE Guitars website over the last 9‑10 years or so, as well as the usual social media activity.
Very recently, I felt an irresistible urge to write a fiction novel. Its status is currently work‑in‑progress. It will be called, ‘The Distortion Diaries’ (remember, you read it here first). It started out as an amateur musician’s journal but the early content was clichéd, derivative and, frankly, very dull. It also wouldn’t fill a novel. So, I expanded the story to include a broader variety of situations and characters. The result will be, believe this or not, an eroti‑rom‑com with PARENTAL ADVISORY for Explicit Content. Even then, it isn’t at all what you might think or expect. Heck, how it turned out surprised me too! I don’t know if anyone will ever get to read it. It doesn’t matter. It is something creative that I had to do for myself. It isn’t good enough for a publisher to pick up and I have absolutely nil experience of self‑publishing, so it might never see the light of day. I have considered serialising it through the CRAVE Musings (i.e. the monthly blog articles) but I’m not sure the public is ready for some lovey‑dovey smut‑ridden muso pulp on a vintage guitar website though. The novel may end up just an aborted, ill‑advised, folly of an average superego’s gratuitous self‑indulgence. Thoughts on a postcard please.
Parental Advisory Label
Whether anything comes of this probably pointless fictional venture, I have no idea but it’s been addictive and fun to come up with something non‑factual for a change. And, no, it isn’t autobiographical, just in case you were wondering. Nor is it aspirational. Sadly, seeing as the protagonist has a ‘good time’ on the whole. Lucky git.
In truth, I would actually like to try and self‑publish the novel but I have no idea whatsoever about how to go about such an endeavour, so it will probably languish in long‑lasting literary limbo (stop it with the alliteration, already!).
New 2023 albums
As it’s the time of year for lists, here is a breakdown of 2023 album releases acquired during the year. As usual, these aren’t the only albums bought and neither will they be the only 2023 albums over time. Here are this year’s 33 purchases:
100 gecs – 10,000 gecs Alborosie – Shengen Dub/Embryonic Dub Caroline Polachek – Desire, I Want To Turn Into You The Chemical Brothers – For That Beautiful Feeling Creation Rebel – Hostile Environment The Cure – Black Sessions: Maison De La Radio Paris 2004 (live broadcast) Depeche Mode – Memento Mori Don Letts – Outta Sync Dub Pistols – Frontline Everything But The Girl – Fuse Fred Again.. & Brian Eno – Secret Life Gentleman’s Dub Club – On A Mission… Hollie Cook – Happy Hour In Dub James Holden – Imagine This Is A High Dimensional Space Of All Possibilities King Krule – Space Heavy King Tubby & The Observer All Stars – Dubbing With The Observer Kurt Vile – Back To Moon Beach Lana Del Rey – Did You Know That There’s A Tunnel Under Ocean Blvd Laurel Halo – Atlas Mitski – The Land Is Inhospitable And So Are We The Murder Capital – Gigi’s Recovery The Orb – Metallic Spheres In Colour (Feat. David Gilmour) The Orb – Prism Orbital – Optical Delusion Pigs Pigs Pigs Pigs Pigs Pigs Pigs – Land Of Sleeper Queens Of The Stone Age – In Times New Roman… Rolling Stones – Hackney Diamonds Skindred – Smile Sleaford Mods – UK GRIM Slowdive – Everything Is Alive Steve Hillage – LA Forum 31.1.77 (live) X‑Press 2 – Thee Yeule – Softscars
Is there a favourite 2023 album out of that lot? Well, I keep coming back to British alternative/indie shoegaze/dream pop band, Slowdive and ‘Everything Is Alive’ more than once, so that’s a fair choice at the time of writing. The big disappointment was Don Letts’ ‘Outta Sync’. Sadly. It comprises many well-crafted pop songs but very little of what I, and I think many others, hoped for in the way of heavy dub reggae tracks.
An even bigger disappointment for me was what didn’t appear. The Cure had hinted that their first studio album since 2008’s ‘4:13 Dream’, heralded as, ‘Songs Of A Lost World’ would be released in 2022. It was notable by its absence and many enthusiasts were hoping that it would finally see the light of day in 2023. The band tempted fans by playing several of the new tracks during their live concerts during the year. However, still nothing tangible has appeared on record store shelves. Let’s hope Robert Smith & co. get around to letting us hear it in 2024. Sixteen years is a long time to wait for new material. C’mon Bob, don’t keep us waiting any longer.
Note: I haven’t gone back to cover 2020, 2021 and 2022 lists of those year’s album releases, as this article would become just a loooooong list.
Whazzup for CRAVE Guitars in 2024?
Before Covid, I used to include at the end of the ‘review of the year’, a shortlist of vintage guitar gear that I might try to acquire in the subsequent 12‑month period. Rarely were the predictions spot on, or even close. Given CRAVE Guitars’ limited activity, space and funds, there is little point in speculating other than in very broad terms.
While there is always a long list of ‘most wanted’ guitars, it’s unlikely to expand significantly in 2024. I am actually generally relatively content with my lot. For now. I am sure that GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) will strike again at some point.
Having launched CRAVE Basses in 2023, there are only four vintage bass guitars in the ‘collection’ thus far. There are a few I might be interested in looking for and which may improve diversity in this area.
There are no intentions for ‘new’ CRAVE Amps at the moment. But that can change, depending on opportunity.
I am also keeping an eye open for some interesting vintage stomp boxes for CRAVE Effects but it really depends on whether anything crops up at a reasonable market price.
The overall result is that there are no specific ambitions for 2024. Next year’s annual review will probably be very short and very dull! I have learned from past experience that predictions aren’t a good idea. Not only are they over‑ambitious but also they end up way wide of the mark. So, I will take things as they come and await any surprises with great anticipation. That sounds like it might be a bit more fun than reporting on yet another failed plan.
CRAVE Guitars ‘Record(s) of the Month’
It seems that this might become a regular feature. I listen to a lot of music (see last month’s article, ‘Music Machinations’ – November 2023). There are some albums that tend to stand out from the rest. There is no rhyme or reason why they do, they just do. Over the last month, I just can’t split two albums, which I’ve been enjoying amongst all the other great material out there. They both come under the general genre category of instrumental ‘stoner rock’ but that downplays their appeal. So, on account of there being SO much great music to discover, I’m going for the plural of ‘Record’ for December 2023. Let’s just call that extra little ‘(s)’ a Christmas/New Year treat for y’all. Enjoy
Eternal Tapestry – Beyond The 4th Door (2011) – First up is this strange thing of beauty. Eternal Tapestry is an American psych rock band based in Portland, Oregon. It may not be regarded by some as their best but it was their first ‘proper’ record label release, after several previous albums. It isn’t heavy. It sounds like a group of friends getting together for a jam session. To get that right is a LOT harder than people think. It is atmospheric, dreamy and so far out of this world that it leaves the sordid real world truly out of sight. Good. laid back, hypnotic, immersive, psychedelic and otherworldly experience.
My Sleeping Karma – Soma (2012) – Not the same as Eternal Tapestry but not too far off either. My Sleeping Karma is a German psych rock band from Aschaffenburg, Bayern and ‘Soma’ is their 4th studio album. The tracks are long, intentionally repetitive and with a gentle groove. It’s not quite an impromptu jam session but it has a distinctive psychedelic undercurrent that can be great for zoning out. I prefer this to other MSK studio albums, as it has a bit more variety within the confines of its moody origins. Emotional krautrock. Who’da thought?
Albums Of The Month – December 2023
Tailpiece
Good riddance to 2023. Funny (not) how I seem destined to repeat that same dreary sentiment every year. Ever hopeful and optimistically deluded, I have to remain confident that 2024 will be a bit better. Any improvement will be eagerly grasped. A new year, new opportunities.
My naïve wish and hope for 2024? Listen up all humans! Stop destroying our planet and stop killing each other. Then put all that wasted money to good use making a peaceful, sustainable civilisation, fare and just for all. A pipe dream, maybe, but one has to dream.
As far as articles for 2024 are concerned, I have a couple of ideas gestating, although nothing firmed up at this stage, Watch this space folks. Tune in, same time, same channel, next month. In the meantime, I wish you all a Happy New Year. Be good.
Truth, peace, love, and guitar music be with you always. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “The best thing in life is freedom”
GREETINGS GREAT GUITAR people and welcome back to some ‘even more whazzup at CRAVE Guitars’, herein the third and final part of the triptych of guitar‑related ‘current affairs’ articles. You may be pleased to know that this one is a wee bit shorter than usual. You might well conclude that I pad out these monologues because I revel in writing voluble blurb for the sake of it. If there isn’t much to say, I won’t… or will I?
For the record, at the time of writing, current COVID‑19 statistics indicate that there are now over 25 million confirmed cases and 843,000 deaths recorded globally and still rising. These are scary and truly staggering statistics for a health pandemic during the modern era. Like every other responsible adult, CRAVE Guitars is not only weary of the enforced constraints of living through coronageddon but also aghast at the sheer arrogant stupidity of selfish covidiots who ignore the threat and risk prolonging the danger for the rest of us. GGggrrrr. Right, got that out of my system, now back to business.
While I cannot promise oodles of delightful entertainment, I can at least deliver on what I said that I would do two months ago which is to bring you all bang up‑to‑date with what else has been happening down here in the south west of the UK during 2020. As a rapid recap, the first slice of this recent 3-parter was to cover last year’s (2019) purchases in some detail, the second was to cover the on‑going vintage guitar repatriation project, and this third part is basically a ‘what’s new in at CRAVE Guitars’ in 2020 so far. So, getting right to the point, what shiny new old stuff has come CRAVE Guitars’ way?
New in at CRAVE Guitars in 2020, so far
Well, for starters, it has been a very quiet time for guitars recently. This is primarily because a) I’m trying futilely to save funds for the much‑vaunted but little‑actioned cellar conversion, and b) actually finding the 5 guitar Rs – the right instruments at the right time in the right place in the right condition at the right price. Then there is the COVID‑19 situation triggering the worst recession in living memory going on in the background, which is affecting the fundamental economics of supply and demand.
CRAVE Amps has been equally quiet but more eventful than last year. While there has been only one purchase, it is a doozy and one I’ve been after for a couple of years. Amps take up a lot of space and demand a lot of attention, as well as resources, so buying a whole bunch of them isn’t exactly a high‑priority large‑scale exercise.
It is CRAVE Effects where I’ve been most active this year; I’ve been a very busy boy (for me). Effect pedals have a number of advantages; they generally require less capital outlay per item (but not always!) and most take a lot less space to accommodate. There also seems to be a plethora of choice (unlike guitars at the moment). Under current circumstances, and with another deep economic downturn looming, effect pedals have proved less financially risky all round, which is a good thing as funds are very limited. Having said that, a couple of these pedals cost nearly as much (or more!) than an ‘affordable vintage’ guitar, so perhaps I need to have a rethink. Effect pedals also make a great complement to the guitars and amps and they can be great fun to amass. So… here is the shortlist of what has actually come this way in the last 8 months.
CRAVE Guitars (2)
1984 Gibson Flying V Designer Series
1979 Peavey T-60
CRAVE Amps (1)
1973 Fender Princeton Reverb
CRAVE Effects (11)
1986 BOSS DD‑2 Digital Delay
1984 BOSS DM‑3 Delay
1980 Electro‑Harmonix Bad Stone Phase Shifter
1981 Electro‑Harmonix EH4600 Small Clone Mini‑Chorus
1982 Ibanez CP9 Compressor/Limiter
1981 Ibanez PT‑909 Phase Tone
1978 MXR Analog Delay
1982 MXR Micro Flanger
1982 MXR Phase 100
1982 MXR Stereo Chorus
1976 Sola Sound Tone Bender Fuzz
Plus 3 replacements for existing pedals:
1982 BOSS DM-2 Delay
1975 MXR Phase 90
1980 MXR Dyna Comp (compressor)
The whys and wherefores
Just sharing a list of gear doesn’t give any sense about the rationale behind searching them out or how they fit into the overall CRAVE Guitars strategy. Although unforeseen opportunities cannot be ignored, there is generally some rhyme and reason to purchasing decisions. In order to give some insight to what the heck I’m doing, it’s worth a little bit of exposition in each case.
1984 Gibson Flying V Designer Series – Believe it or not, up to now I didn’t have a ‘normal’ Flying V. I was actually looking for a vintage Gibson Explorer E2 and got within a hair’s breadth of getting hold of a very nice example but sadly it proved ultimately unsuccessful. This was very disappointing, as it would have been a perfect partner for my groovy Flying V2. Anyway, I’d been holding off on a couple of other vintage guitars while looking into the E2, which were quite tempting. Then I came across this very nice example of a cool and rare all‑original Flying V Designer Series in pinstriped ivory. It was happily residing in restful retirement in sunny Florida, USA, so I took it upon myself to do a ‘Cocoon’ on it and transport it over to a chilly and soggy UK. Basically, I didn’t want to lose out on another guitar, so I bit the bullet and jumped in (darn that FOMO!). The exchange rate, customs duty, VAT and fees made it a highly unprofitable transaction but to heck with it. At least the relaxation in CITES regulations didn’t prevent the rosewood fingerboard from flying (sic!) my way. As it turned out, I think I was lucky to grab it when I did. Thankfully, I am not driven by monetary gain, as I’ll probably never get the full cost back, so I’ll just hang onto it and enjoy it, which is what CRAVE Guitars is all about. Original Flying Vs from the 1960s and now even the 1970s are getting incredibly expensive. I’m sure it won’t be long before the evil profit‑motivated collectorati get their heads around the up‑to‑now not very popular 1980s Flying Vs. Personally, I like them and that’s plenty good enough for me.
1984 Gibson Flying V Designer Series
1979 Peavey T-60 – I’d been interested in the Peavey T‑60 for a while, as it’s a bit of an underground underdog, which often piques my curiosity. The T‑60 was Peavey’s first venture into electric solid body guitars, so it really is the first of its kind. The people who have owned them tend to rave about them but they don’t tend to come anywhere near the top of the list for collectors (a good thing too, if you ask me). I thought I’d satisfy my inquisitiveness and try one out for myself. They are still relatively good value for a vintage guitar, especially when compared to the aforementioned Flying V for instance! The T‑60 is bit of a heavy beast at just under 10lbs (4.4kg), so that particular reputation is on the button but… remember that weight was seen as a ‘good thing’ at the time. It has very 1970s style with its slightly ungainly outline and natural ash finish. On close inspection, it is quite intriguing with its subtle carved top and now‑ever‑so‑trendy thin but tough satin finish. The T‑60’s electrics are unique in that the tone controls blend from single coil to humbucker, a feature that I think remains unique to this day. In addition, a small phase switch adds further flexibility when both pickups are in use, making the T‑60 a very versatile and underrated instrument. It may seem an odd choice for a CRAVE Guitar but, to me, it makes perfect sense – cool, rare, American, vintage and electric. Nuff said.
1979 Peavey T-60
1973 Fender Princeton Reverb – I have been using American valve amps for years and the Fender Princeton Reverb has been top of the ‘wanted’ list for a quite a while. I was fortunate enough to find one in the same county, so off I trundled just before the coronavirus lockdown and brought her home with me. It was just what I was after, a 1973 ‘silverface’ Princeton Reverb in fantastic condition. I am not wealthy or pedantic enough to aspire to a ‘blackface’ or ‘tweed’ Princeton, so this will do very nicely thank you. It is still hand‑wired and true to its origins. My vintage Fender Champ and Vibro Champ have been reliable little home workhorse amps and my Music Man 210 ‘sixty five’ can deliver big noise when needed but I was pining for some valve driven spring reverb in a small package and this is just the ticket. I had been using a BOSS RV‑2 Digital Reverb with the Champs but this brings all the basics together in one neat solution. It has been modified to a 240V UK mains power supply, a very practical mod, which is fine by me. I have to say that it sounds awesome for its diminutive size. The valve tremolo is not as pronounced as other Fender amps but apparently that is quite normal and I can live with it. I am now looking for a vintage ‘silverface’ Fender Deluxe Reverb to compare the Princeton’s 10” speaker with the Deluxe’s 12”. Is that getting greedy?
1973 Fender Princeton Reverb
1986 BOSS DD‑2 Digital Delay – You may already know that I am a huge fan of analogue solid state echo pedals. However, the limited delay time usually tops out at c.300ms and the tails can get a bit mushy. Sometimes, longer delays and crisp clarity are called for. The DD‑2 was Boss’ first digital pedal and the first compact digital delay. It is one of the few digital effects worth having that appeared before my vintage cut‑off year of 1989. Last year, I got hold of a 1980s BOSS RV‑2 Digital Reverb and they go well together, so here they are, now part of the CRAVE Effects family. If nothing else, it shows that I’m not a complete digital‑phobe.
1986 BOSS DD 2 Digital Delay
1984 BOSS DM‑3 Delay – Going back to analogue delays after my digital excursion (see above), the DM‑3 fits that bill. It is remarkably similar to the outgoing DM‑2. The internal circuit was tweaked to improve fidelity and reduce noise but there really isn’t that much between them. The only visible difference is the screen printing and the unique knobs used on this model. Other than that, it is business as usual and it does sound very similar to its predecessor. So, an interesting variation on the classic DM‑2. The DM‑3 was the last analogue delay pedal made by BOSS until they released the DM‑2 Waza Craft in the 2010s.
1984 BOSS DM 3 Delay
[Image: 1984 BOSS DM 3 Delay]
1980 Electro‑Harmonix Bad Stone Phase Shifter – The EHX Bad Stone was another pedal that I had back in the 1970s, so I have a soft spot for it. I had retained a Small Stone but the Bad Stone obviously ran away with a better guitarist than me. So, it was a case of reuniting with an old friend and feeling that comfort that comes with rose‑tinted familiarity. It sounds great, just like it did back in the day. All’s well that ends well. Good EHX Bad Stones are getting surprisingly expensive on the vintage effect market. Welcome home, mate.
1980 Electro Harmonix Bad Stone Phase Shifter
1981 Electro‑Harmonix EH4600 Small Clone Mini‑Chorus – Now here is another big‑time elite (a.k.a. expensive) classic pedal. I was never really into chorus pedals when I was younger, so this was a new one for me. I preferred my faithful trio of EHX pedals, the Big Muff Pi (fuzz), Electric Mistress (flanger) and Deluxe Memory Man (echo). The Small Clone didn’t really achieve reverential status until Kurt Cobain used it to great effect (sic!) in Nirvana’s revolutionary grunge exploits. Yes it is good for what it is but is its hallowed status truly warranted? I guess so if you want to imitate the past but there are many other competent chorus pedals out there. Original vintage Small Clones seem to be very scarce and when they do come up they are pricey and/or in a bit of a state, so I think I was fortunate to grab this one.
1981 Electro Harmonix EH4600 Small Clone Mini Chorus
1982 Ibanez CP9 Compressor/Limiter – Compressor pedals are strange things. They aren’t in‑your‑face effects that will immediately blow you away. They add a glossy sheen to playing that is very effective but also quite subtle. They give a studio produced feel to playing dynamics when used properly. Compact pedals are very simple compared to their studio counterparts and a bit of experimentation is needed to hit the ‘sweet spot’. Good compressor pedals are probably best left on full‑time and it’s only when they are switched off that you realise what magic they have been weaving. The ‘9’ series Ibanez CP9 was made famous by David Gilmour, so everyone then jumped on the CP9 bandwagon in a vain attempt to sound like him. Probably a pedal for the guitarist who doesn’t have one and didn’t know they needed one. The CP9 is still very good value on the used vintage market despite the strong artist association.
1982 Ibanez CP9 Compressor/Limiter
1981 Ibanez PT‑909 Phase Tone – Alongside the iconic Ibanez TS‑808 Tube Screamer, there were a whole range of other ‘0’ series pedals sporting the familiar square footswitch. The PT‑909 is one of those ‘other ones’. Ibanez got through a huge number of phase pedal models in a short period of time and this is just one in that long line. It’s a phase pedal and it sounds like most other phase pedals, which pretty much says it all. Incidentally, I actually have more phase pedals than any other type of effect. I guess I’m a bit jaded or perhaps it’s just a phase (sic!) I’m going through. The PT‑909 does its job well but it doesn’t necessarily stand out from the crowd (more below). It is, though, better sounding, more ergonomic and sturdier than the previous ‘narrow box’ PT‑909. Another vintage stomp box that remains reasonably priced at the moment.
1981 Ibanez PT 909 Phase Tone
1978 MXR Analog Delay – Right, now we’re really talking. The 3rd echo pedal in this catch‑up and the 2nd analogue one. The now‑vintage Electro‑Harmonix Deluxe Memory Man is my all‑time favourite delay pedal and I’ve had mine since new, so there is a lofty pedestal with which to compare. The Japanese BOSS and Ibanez delay pedals are all very well but there is something about good American delay effects that sets them apart. The MXR Analog Delay is a large, unwieldy, mains powered box with just 3 controls and, boy, does it do a grand job? I really, really respect this analogue delay for its warm, lush repeats. OK, so the delay tops out at the typical c.300ms but when it sounds this good, does it really matter? Well, sometimes, to be honest. The enclosure paintwork is a little scuffed here and there but that’s nothing, as it is the sonic signature that excels. Does it beat the EHX? No, not quite but it really is a marvellous effect. The MXR Analog Delay is much heard on recordings but for some reason, it isn’t much talked about. They are quite scarce, so they tend to be quite pricey. However, in my humble view, they’re definitely worth it. Don’t delay… or, on second thoughts, do.
1978 MXR Analog Delay
1982 MXR Micro Flanger – Once again, I find the American pedals beat the Japanese, even though the latter make some very good effects and sold them very successfully. I can’t be objective as to why I feel that way, so perhaps it is just a subjective bias. This rather demure looking MXR Micro Flanger is one is one of the later ones with LED status light and DC power input, so it is immediately more convenient than the older ones. It also sounds great. It isn’t up there with my favourite flanger, the Electro‑Harmonix Electric Mistress but it is very creditable. I’m now on the lookout for a large box, mains powered MXR Flanger to see what it can do that the Micro Flanger can’t. I think it may improve on it by a small margin and perhaps challenge the EHX, let’s see. Watch this space.
1982 MXR Micro Flanger
1982 MXR Phase 100 – I’m already a lucky owner of a vintage ‘script’ MXR Phase 45 and the iconic Phase 90. One of those aforementioned unforeseen opportunities came up to get my grubby hands on a large box Phase 100, so here it is. This pedal is unique in the MXR Innovations canon in having this size/shape of enclosure, somewhere between the familiar ‘micro’ boxes and the larger mains powered big boxes. I haven’t had a Phase 100 before and it really was an epiphany for me; this thing sounds awesome. Given that I’m a bit blasé about phasers, using that adjective is saying something. It has a 4‑way preset switch and two rotary controls so, compared to its smaller single‑knob peers, it is very flexible. Perhaps it’s the 6‑stage phasing that raises it above its competition. Whatever fairy dust MXR sprinkled on its innards, it worked and I wasn’t really prepared for the engaging sounds it exudes. It is also in fantastic original condition, which is icing on a tasty cake. The Phase 100 has quickly become my favourite vintage phaser. Sorry Bad Stone, your post has been pipped.
1982 MXR Phase 100
1982 MXR Stereo Chorus – Around the same time that I came across the MXR Analog Delay, I had the opportunity to get this enhanced version of the MXR Micro Chorus (which, to be honest, was the one that I was actually looking for and still don’t have). Like the Analog Delay, the Stereo Chorus is a large, bulky, mains powered behemoth with three controls. Like phasers, I can’t put my hand on my heart and assert that the chorus effect is the bee’s knees but it is certainly very creditable. Comparing this to the Small Clone revealed the answer to my previous question about whether the EHX pedal deserves its post in chorus royalty. Spoiler warning: not really. This one is in exceptionally clean condition and actually quite a bargain as well. Result!
1982 MXR Stereo Chorus
1976 Sola Sound Tone Bender Fuzz – Okey dokey, now we’re getting serious again. Last year, I ventured out of safe territory and acquired two iconic (and very expensive) vintage effect pedals, a 1969 Dallas Arbiter Fuzz Face and 1981 Ibanez TS‑808 Tube Screamer Pro. The Sola Sound Tone Bender Fuzz is another of those exclusive vintage pedals, which is a little surprising given its roots in cheap British effects of the 1970s. It also came under the banner of the British Colorsound brand. I had a Tone Bender back in the day and this was an interesting reintroduction, albeit just a bit (!!!) pricier nowadays. This version of the Tone Bender is based largely on the Electro‑Harmonix Big Muff Pi, so if you’re familiar with that, you know you’re in the right ballpark, tone wise. Plenty of fuzzy goodness. This one is in very good all‑original condition and fuzzes, fizzes and froths in all the right ways. I adore great vintage fuzz pedals. A classic, for sure, but why SO expensive? Really.Hhhhh’jdf
1976 Sola Sound Tone Bender Fuzz
I won’t go into the three replacement pedals here, suffice to say that they were all bought to improve marginally on the ones I had, which can now move on to good homes elsewhere. The image below is of the new replacements (from left to right), 1982 BOSS DM-2 Delay, 1975 MXR Phase 90 and 1980 MXR Dyna Comp (compressor). All very cool effects.
Other 2020 Pedals
One good question might be, how do these purchases all tie together? Well, believe it or not, there is an inherent coherency to the plan. “Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t” (as said by Polonius in Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’).
The two new old guitars integrate seamlessly into the other vintage guitars in the family. Similarly, the amp is very complementary to my other vintage amps and, although I don’t have many, that’s plenty enough… for now. The effects fall into three main camps, the Japanese BOSS and Ibanez range, the American Electro‑Harmonix and MXR lines, plus the odd one or two from Europe or other manufacturers. They generally all derive from the 1960s to the 1980s so, once again, job done.
Full features on both these guitars, amp and effects will appear on the CRAVE Guitars web site in due course (see more below).
Help Needed
Apologies, this is the 3rd article in a row where I’ve made this earnest plea. A few of the effect pedals above have minor electrical issues like extraneous noise, non‑working DC or battery input, LED faults, etc. If there is someone out there with the requisite skillset to help maintain these vintage effects as well as the guitars and amps, and who is local to SE Cornwall in the UK, I would be interested in exploring mutually beneficial opportunities. Is there anyone out there attracted to the proposition? If there is, please contact me at the e-mail address at the bottom of every page on the website. Talking of which…
CRAVE Guitars Web Site
I will probably cover this in more detail in coming articles but I thought that this might be a good place to mention it. For over 2½ years, the CRAVE Guitars’ web site remained largely static and unchanged. This was largely due to more pressing personal circumstances, as it takes a lot of time to do it properly. I have, at long last, finally started the desperately‑needed updates to the web site. Overall, it won’t look much different and its structure remains the same, it’s the content that matters.
CRAVE Guitars – Web Site
So far, the underlying technology has been brought right up‑to‑date and many behind‑the‑scenes components have been made current. It is actually quite a fundamental change to the mechanics, which aren’t immediately apparent when viewing the pages – it’s a bit like a car’s engine rebuild hidden away under the bonnet (a.k.a. hood for American readers).
I have also started the process of introducing a whole raft of new content. Again, at the moment, it isn’t immediately obvious because I’m starting off by replacing what is already there before moving onto adding brand new material.
To give you an idea, there are over 120 existing pages and more than 70 monthly articles. There are 60+ incumbent guitar feature pages to revamp and 15 new guitar feature pages to add. There are only 2 amps to add, then there are 30+ effect pages to overhaul and 26 new effect pages to add. Then there are all the galleries, new features on brands and model histories to add. The resources pages need to be completely re‑worked as they are completely out of date, often irrelevant and error‑prone. Even the main CRAVE Guitars logo has been very subtly refined.
Also, the bass guitars have gone from the site, as have the newer guitars that don’t (yet) qualify as vintage. This makes the material a bit more focused than it was. I hope to re‑introduce CRAVE Basses in the future but it’s not an immediate priority.
In coming weeks and months, I hope to make many fundamental changes. Well over 1,000 new photographs have been taken and many dozens of new features have been written. It is a colossal task and one that I’ve been actively prevaricating (?!) for way too long. Now that I’ve started, I will actually relish rejuvenating the site and making it a lot more relevant, and hopefully a respected resource for people to enjoy. There is so much to do that it will probably take until the end of the year before the project is completed (and then the on‑going updates and maintenance). By the time the main job is done, every single page and post will have been updated in some way or other. Some pages have already been finished and have gone live. I will work through the immense backlog as quickly as I can.
If anyone has any positive and constructive thoughts or ideas about what you’d like to see on the web site, let me know and I’ll give it serious consideration. Also, some typos and errors will undoubtedly creep in, so I would appreciate being informed of any corrections and clarifications to help improve the quality of the narrative.
Tailpiece
There isn’t a lot of time to go now until the end of a thoroughly miserable and depressing 2020. There also isn’t much time to take action to acquire some of those elusive items that were on last year’s ‘most wanted’ list. I think I’m going to fail big time on the guitars but I’m very content with how other things are going. I realise how fortunate I am to have all these great vintage guitars, amps and effects, so I’m not going to complain about my lot… much. Anyhow, the quest continues and it’s time to get back to the graft!
Who knows what I’ll be pontificating about for the next article but I’m sure I’ll come up with something. In the meantime, I will be in splendid misanthropic solitude and voluntary seclusion to work on the web site and play vintage guitars. Sounds good to me. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “Why are so many people so determined to be so stupid?”
WELCOME BACK ONCE again guitar fans and hello to any new visitors. We are now half way through an extraordinary 2020 and the world is still turned upside down in so many concerning ways. While there may be glimmers of light at the end of the tunnel for COVID‑19, there is still a long way to go and there will be profound ramifications that it will leave in its sizeable wake. At the end of last year, we had no inclination as to what was about to befall, yet here we are now. Perhaps us hooman beans really aren’t as clever as we seem to think we are (shock, horror – hold the front page!). It seems that we also still have some way to go before all people are deemed equal and can live their lives freely, responsibly and peacefully. The first half of 2020 has passed by very quickly and, frankly, good riddance to it. I don’t like wishing life away but it has been 6 months that I’m sure we could all have done without, everything being on‑hold.
Well, here we are and no more historical facts, quotes or predictions on which to ponder this month. I said at the very end of the last article that I would get back to pontificating about ‘cool & rare American vintage electric’ guitars and, at last, I can deliver on that promise/threat (delete as applicable).
There are 3 themes on which I’d like to embark this month. Firstly, I mentioned in my December 2019 article that I had bought some gear (big surprise… not) during last year but I didn’t go any further than to list what they were, without any indication as to the whys and wherefores behind the spending spree. Secondly, after 18 months, most of the 42 repatriated guitars have now been properly assessed and worked through as far as I am able. So far, I haven’t given any real sense about what I found and what I learnt from the exercise. Thirdly, there have been a number of purchases during the first half of 2020 and in due course I can reveal what those are and how they relate both to the existing ‘collection’ and to the ‘wanted’ list from that same December 2019 end‑of‑year/look‑forward roundup.
I think that there is more than enough material to occupy one article, so without further ado, let us begin at the beginning. Sitting comfortably? Good. Then, we’ll begin…
2019 CRAVE Guitars’ Purchases
An Introduction to the 2019 CRAVE Guitars
2019 was certainly an interesting year. Due to circumstances, I started out not anticipating much in the way of guitar purchases. The relatively modest vintage guitar ‘wanted’ list from December 2018 included a Danelectro of some sort, a Fender Starcaster and a Gibson Melody Maker. These had all featured on the target list for more than one year, so it seemed a fairly realistic expectation. What actually happened was a bit more fruitful than I foresaw and I think it deserves some rationale to indicate why they weren’t random purchases. In fact, 2019 resulted in nine new additions to the CRAVE Guitars family, spanning five decades (1940s‑1980s with at least one from each). I couldn’t really afford the outlay but, although it meant sacrifices in other areas, it has probably been worth a bit of hardship. I hope you find this array of short stories moderately interesting.
1982 Fender Bullet H2
This is what happened when esteemed Fender designer John Page was tasked with creating a low cost student model to carry the ‘Made in U.S.A.’ decal and replace the outgoing Mustang and Musicmaster? The result was the Fender Bullet. I’d already acquired a 1981 Fender Bullet which was essentially a Telecaster‑on‑a‑budget model. Several aspects of the first iteration intrigued me and I set about looking for a second generation model, with the more Stratocaster‑like body outline. Initially, I was looking for a ‘standard’ one with twin single coil pickups and the integrated bent steel pick guard and bridge assembly, just like the ‘Tele’ Bullet. Instead, I found a cool Fender Bullet H2 in great all‑original condition in very smart red and white with a maple neck. This version has a more robust standard integrated hardtail bridge/tailpiece with through‑body stringing. The H2 features what at first glance appear to be standard twin ‘humbuckers’. However, looks can be deceiving. The pickups aren’t actually traditional humbuckers – they are actually 4 single coil pickups arranged as two pairs in humbucking configuration. In addition to a normal 3‑way pickup selector switch, the H2 has two additional buttons that ‘split’ the humbucking pickup pairs to give a wide range of tonal options including genuine single coil sounds (unlike most tapped or split humbuckers). When it arrived, one of the 4 pickups wasn’t working and it had to be sent to a pickup expert to fix. Thankfully, it was a weak connection between the coil and pickup lead, so easily sorted. Like the earlier Bullet, the H2 has a very nice standard Telecaster neck. The diverse sounds available from this guitar are nothing short of remarkable and it makes me wonder why this particular unique configuration hasn’t been widely used since. The early USA‑made Bullets were misunderstood and tend to attract a lot of unfair criticism from purists. As a result, like the Fender Leads of the time, they weren’t manufactured for long. Judging it on its own terms, this is really not the cheap Stratocaster imitation it may seem at first glance. I realised that the Fender Bullet H2s are both cool and quite rare, so fit the CRAVE criteria. I never envisaged that it would be so fascinating and collectable while still being affordable. This Bullet H2 came with its original (if battered and stickered) Original Hard Shell Case (OHSC).
1975 Fender Starcaster
The Fender Starcaster (and, no, that isn’t a spelling error) has been a long‑standing ‘wanted’ guitar, ever since I got a 1960s Coronado. There is very little similarity between the two models but as there are very few semi‑acoustic electrics in the brand’s history, I was once again curious. Unusually, I bought this one from a retailer, so I probably paid more than I normally would have considered but it was worth it. Where the Coronado is fully hollow, the Starcaster has a solid centre block running under the pickups and the massive hardtail bridge/tailpiece assembly. Surprisingly, the Starcaster has through‑body stringing like a Telecaster. While the Coronado has DeArmond single coil pickups, the Starcaster uses the sublime Seth Lover ‘wide range’ humbuckers as used on several Telecaster variants from the 1970s. While both the Coronado and the Starcaster use bolt on maple necks, they are, again, very different and the latter is unique to the model with a maple fingerboard. Both the Coronado and Starcaster were reissued by Fender in 2013 although neither are a patch on the originals. The vintage Starcasters are instantly recognisable because of the distinctive bridge assembly and the 5 controls (2 volume, 2 tone plus master volume). When going over the guitar on arrival, I found it was a rare very early 1975 (pre‑production?) model. It has been well used but is still in remarkably good condition with the sort of genuine patina that only age can bestow. The tobacco sunburst and sunburst flame maple is just gorgeous. It is also a fantastic guitar to play with a great neck and I really like the (in‑vogue) offset body shape. Even better, it doesn’t play or sound like any other Fender, ever made. The Starcaster didn’t prove popular on its original release and wasn’t produced for long before being quietly discontinued in 1982. I can understand why it didn’t sell in large numbers but that misses the point about its exclusive charms. Make no mistake, the Starcaster is a high quality instrument just waiting to be rediscovered. This beauty is not to be confused with cheapo far‑eastern Strat imitations from the 2000s that unfortunately carried the ‘Starcaster by Fender’ moniker. The case, while vintage, is not an original Fender Starcaster case. Obtaining a Fender Starcaster was a long‑standing aspiration achieved, which can now be removed from the ‘wanted’ list. These babies are now becoming extortionately expensive on the vintage market, as the ‘collectorati’ are now cottoning onto them. Seems I got this one just about in time‑ish.
1979 Fender Stratocaster Anniversary
I already have a 1977 Stratocaster hardtail and I was kinda looking around for one from the early 1970s with a vibrato before they become unaffordable (rapidly heading that way now). Along the way, I became distracted by the 1979 Anniversary Stratocaster. I missed out on a couple before I finally attained one (once again at a higher price than I intended, unfortunately). The Anniversary is distinctive in that it was Fender’s first foray into limited edition commemorative models, celebrating 25 years since the original Stratocaster’s introduction in 1954. I was attracted by the classic look of silver, black and maple fingerboard. Whether one can regard a massive 10,000 examples as a ‘limited edition’ is debatable. It also comes with a very unsubtle ‘Anniversary’ logo emblazoned on the bass horn plus a much more understated 25th anniversary neck plate which carries its serial/issue number. This one comes with its original certificate of authenticity and most (but not quite all) of its case candy, as well as its ABS OHSC, all of which is nice to have. Like all Anniversary models, this one is heavy at 10lbs (4.6kgs) but I can live with that because of the part this model plays in electric guitar heritage. It looks cool, sounds great and plays very nicely, although the action is a little high. Fundamentally, though, it is essentially a standard Stratocaster with a few aesthetic embellishments. This guitar is in excellent, almost mint condition, which suggests that it was kept as a memento rather than an instrument to be played, which in my view is sacrilege. These aren’t especially rare instruments and many purists would say they aren’t cool. Well, I’m going to stand my ground and say that I like it, which is why it now has a safe home here at CRAVE Guitars.
1983 Fender Stratocaster Elite
This is the first of a pair of Fender Elites that I bought in 2019 (and the second Stratocaster!), both of which I think are quite desirable. As background, the Elite series was only produced in 1982 and 1983 before it was withdrawn shortly before CBS sold Fender in 1984. It is the innovative electronics that really set the Elites apart. The signal chain starts with 3 ‘noiseless’ single coil pickups including an additional dummy coil to reduce hum. These pickups are distinguishable by the Fender logo covers with no visible pole pieces. Instead of a 5‑way pickup selector switch, there are 3 on/off buttons, 1 for each pickup, giving 8 permutations in all (including all ‘off’). This arrangement provides easy access to more sounds than the standard Stratocaster of the time. The switching is unusual but also very intuitive (far better than Fender’s current S‑1 switching). The signal then passes through an on‑board active pre‑amp powered by a 9V battery. The controls are different too and not just the nice soft‑touch logo knobs. There is the usual single master volume complemented by two master tone controls, comprising Fender’s propriety MDX (MiD‑range eXpander) boost and TBX (Treble/Bass eXpander) circuit. The Strat’s iconic jack plate is also absent, with the output moved to the body edge. The bridge assembly is also unique, here it is a top‑loading hardtail Fender Freeflyte bridge. In use, it plays just like a Strat, although it is a touch on the heavy side. The sounds though are, as you might expect, quite different from a normal Stratocaster. Before the purists clamour with cries of sacrilegious iconoclasm, the electronics went on, albeit modified, to be used in both the Eric Clapton and Buddy Guy signature guitars, so the Elite wasn’t an abortive experiment. This example looks particularly cool in creamy Olympic White with a lovely rosewood fingerboard. This Elite is in lovely all‑original excellent condition and comes with its ABS OHSC. Like many 1970s and 1980s Fenders, these are now becoming more desirable on the vintage market. These original Elites are not to be confused with the similarly named but otherwise standard Elite series instruments issued by Fender between 2016 and 2019.
1983 Fender Telecaster Elite
More?! OK then. Onto the second in the pair of Fender Elites. This one is a 1983 Telecaster Elite in lovely translucent Sienna Burst with a gorgeous rosewood fingerboard. Like the Stratocaster Elite, it is a fascinating variant on the classic design. The electronics here comprise dual‑coil noise‑cancelling Alnico 2 pickups routed through an on‑board active 9V preamp with 2 volume controls allied to the same MDX (mid‑range) and TBX (high‑range) tone controls as found on the Stratocaster Elite. Like its sister model, it has the unique top‑loading hardtail Fender Freeflyte bridge. The body has cool single binding on the top edge, similar to the original Custom Telecaster from the 1960s. For some inexplicable reason, the designers at Fender felt that a Telecaster would look good with a Les Paul‑like scratchplate. They were wrong, it doesn’t. Fortunately, the scratchplate was provided in the case, rather than being attached and even then, it could be stuck on with double‑sided tape. Personally, I prefer it without the scratchplate, revealing the woodgrain through the finish. Like the Stratocaster, the Telecaster is a touch on the heavy side but I can forgive that because of its unique position within the Fender canon. This little beauty is in near mint condition and includes its OHSC. The Elite is far from your average Telecaster and, on my unending quest for something cool and rare, it has found a good home here at CRAVE Guitars. Both Elite models (and there was also a Precision bass in the range as well) are harder to come across than standard models, so the prices tend to reflect their relative scarcity. The Elites are unequivocally ‘curio’ guitars from the last dying days of Fender’s notorious CBS era, so they tend to be frowned upon by purists, which makes them all the more appealing to the maverick side of my enduring addiction to the quirky and idiosyncratic guitars from a generally unloved period of guitar history.
1947 Gibson ES-150
Thus, we move onto the ‘Big G’. The author sadly hit one of those dreaded ‘big birthdays’ in 2019 and without much else to celebrate, I figured that I would mark my passing years with something self‑indulgent. I had been keeping my eyes peeled for a vintage Gibson ES‑150 for several years and watching as the prices escalated to, frankly, silly levels. I couldn’t afford one of the carved top pre‑war models with the Charlie Christian pickup, so I was looking around for a newer model, which would be cheaper. For those that may not know, the Gibson ES‑150 was introduced in 1936 and is acknowledged as the first commercially successful electric Spanish guitar. I eventually found a lovely 1947 ES‑150 from the first year of post‑war production and sporting a single P90 pickup. This one was way, way more expensive than I could normally justify so, because of my impending mortality, I was tempted to go for it. In fact, it is the most I’ve ever spent on a single instrument to‑date. This ES‑150 was residing in Italy, so I imported it before Brexit shuts down all opportunities to access vintage fare from our European colleagues. Owning a really old hollow body non‑cutaway jazz guitar is new territory for me, so it was with some trepidation and excitement that I was delving into this particular art form. The guitar itself is in fine all‑original condition with just surface crazing to the lovely sunburst nitrocellulose finish. There is no serial number or Factory Order Number (FON) which, along with the features, dates it to 1947. Playing it is a different experience altogether, as it needs heavy semi‑flat wound strings to get the laminated top vibrating. Then there is the limited upper fret access to contend with, so it takes some time to acclimatise to the technique. Being deep‑bodied and fully hollow, this one actually works quite well as an acoustic jazz guitar too. As you may know, I really like single pickup guitars, so there is less to get in the way of pure P90 tone. The ES‑150 is currently a bit of an outlier within the CRAVE Guitars family. One thing is for sure, it isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Definitely not the ideal guitar of choice for metal heads though.
1965 Gibson Melody Maker
This 1965 Melody Maker was a bit of a gap filling exercise. Between 1959 and 1971, Gibson released four versions of their ‘student’ guitar, the Melody Maker. The first was a single cutaway Les Paul shape (1959‑1961), the second was a unique and really cute double cutaway model (1961‑1965), the third iteration was a somewhat crude and short‑lived double cutaway model (1965‑1966) and the final generation was SG‑shaped (1967‑1971). This is one of the rather ‘ugly duckling’ models from 1965 (weirdly often called the ‘type 2’, even though it’s the third body shape), which completes the set. The Melody Maker comprises a slab mahogany body with double cutaways, a set mahogany neck with the typical narrow headstock, one single coil pickup, and comes in a reserved cherry nitrocellulose finish. Unsurprisingly, this model has never been reissued by Gibson, although there has been a Joan Jett signature guitar. The Melody Maker name has re‑appeared a number of times since the 1960s. This example is not in pristine shape but is all‑original and it comes with its OHSC. At least this one hasn’t been butchered over the years unlike many. I was shocked that a recent guitar magazine article (which I won’t name but they really should know better) was recommending that the vintage Melody Maker body should be routed and the pickup replaced with a P90 or humbucker! Unbelievable and indefensible! I think that the narrow single coil pickups give the Melody Maker a distinct tone, which is very underrated by purists. Melody Makers are unique in the Gibson history books and unmolested examples deserve much more credit in my view. They are made from the same materials in the same Kalamazoo factory by the same people as other highly prized models and should be regarded (and treated) as worthy vintage instruments in their own right. They are very light and resonant, making them really easy to pick up and play. Compared to many Gibsons from the 1960s, Melody Makers are still relatively affordable on the vintage market and represent a good starting point for people interested in collecting vintage guitars from a major American brand. Personally, I have to admit that I am not a huge fan of this pointy body shape but now that I own one, it is growing on me.
1989 PRS Classic Electric
Having dipped my toes into the world of Paul Reed Smith (PRS) guitars with an elegant 1988 PRS Standard, I was looking around for other early hand‑finished guitars that were made in PRS’s original facility in Annapolis, Maryland. These early, so‑called ‘pre‑factory’ models are becoming increasingly collectable, especially as they are now beginning to get to vintage age (and price!). The early PRS Customs are becoming incredibly expensive, so my eyes settled on an early PRS model that was initially called the Classic Electric when introduced in 1989. The model was swiftly renamed as the CE after a legal dispute with Peavey over the original name. NB. The CE is not to be confused with the far Eastern PRS SE (‘Student Edition’) guitars. I also had my sights set on the early solid Electric Blue metallic finish, which I think is stunningly beautiful. This example is a very early Classic Electric, being only the 473rd guitar off the production line, distinguished by its 24‑fret, bolt‑on maple neck and the plain headstock carrying the block ‘PRS Electric’ logo (soon to change to the familiar modern ‘Paul Reed Smith’ signature script logo). There are quite a few marks including one significant ding to the body and the finish on the back of the neck has worn down. The wear indicates that it has been well played, which is often a sign of a soundly put together instrument. OK, it doesn’t have the flashy flame or quilted maple cap, faux binding, bird inlays or set neck but it is still a very creditable guitar that plays very well and sounds great. The CE is one of those under‑the‑radar PRSs that the collectors tend to overlook, although genuine owners praise them very highly. PRS finally got around to re‑releasing the bolt‑on CE model in 2016 but the new ones really aren’t the same as these early ‘handmade’ examples. Despite the wear and tear, it is all‑original and comes with its OHSC but no case candy. You can’t have everything. A vintage PRS Custom to add to the Standard and Classic Electric sadly has to remain on the wish list for the time being.
1959 Silvertone 1304
I had a bit of a mad spell towards the end of the year when I was buying several guitars for the sake of it. I was looking for a vintage Danelectro and came across this funky little 1959 Silvertone 1304 with its single cutaway and dowdy brown finish. It is very similar to the Danelectro U1 (differentiated by pickup position and headstock logo), which is no surprise seeing that Danelectro manufactured Silvertone guitars for the Sears & Roebuck retail and mail order company at the time. The 1304 is actually a pretty rare model being only available in Sears & Roebuck’s ‘Wish Book’ Christmas catalogue and related advertising of 1958, 1959 and 1960. The neck and familiar ‘coke bottle’ headstock is also rare, being finished in natural, rather than colour matched to the body, apparently due to supply shortages at the time. It also has the circular electrics cover on the back and the squared off neck joint that confirms its age and lineage. The ever present Lipstick pickup and body‑edge tape will be familiar to Danelectro fans. It also feels, plays and sounds just like you’d expect a vintage Danelectro from the 1950s, i.e. great. This was the last of the Danelectro single cutaway body shapes before they moved to double cutaways in the 1960s. The single pickup and simple controls let you focus on playing and getting the most out of a very cool and groovy (and lightweight due to semi acoustic construction) instrument. It is a lot of fun to pick up and play and hard to put down. The action is a little high but that resistance actually forces one to play differently compared to a more ‘refined’ guitar. Like others in this résumé, it is in fine all‑original condition, although it sadly doesn’t come with an original 1950s case. These cool Silvertone and comparable Danelectro guitars are still amazingly affordable for vintage guitars from the so‑called ‘golden era’, perhaps because they were (generally) made in large numbers and sold to a largely undiscriminating ‘student’ audience at the time.
2019 CRAVE Amps? What Amps?
Right, that’s the 2019 guitars covered, so what else was new? Well CRAVE Amplifiers didn’t achieve anything at all in 2019 – no new additions and no losses. Nada. As it turned out, I was quite happy running two relatively similar modest little units as daily go‑to amplification during the year, a 1978 Fender Champ and a 1978 Fender Vibro Champ both in ‘silverface’ livery. Don’t underestimate these diminutive 5W Class A valve amps, they are really great for what they are. I acknowledge that I’m not a vintage amp specialist, so they are not hugely abundant here at CRAVE Guitars. Owning vintage valve amps demands space, time and effort as well as oodles of filthy lucre, so I’m not in a huge rush to buy up large numbers of vintage amps.
An Introduction to the 2019 CRAVE Effects
CRAVE Effects did a little better during 2019, although there were only five new pedals to join the clan. Having said that, two of those were outstanding examples of the type. As with amps, because I am not a vintage effect expert, I’m sticking to a few well‑known global brands from the 1960s to 1980s, rather than go too far into the realms of the unique, idiosyncratic and unusual.
1987 BOSS RV-2 Digital Reverb
It may seem heretical to many but this is the first vintage digital effect to join the CRAVE club. This Japanese BOSS RV‑2 was sought out principally because there are few vintage compact analogue reverb pedals out there. Yes there are the bulky (and expensive) vintage valve reverb tanks from the likes of Fender but I wanted something small and convenient to add an extra special dimension to the aforementioned Fender Champs, neither of which have on‑board reverb. So, a digital reverb was the way to go with this rather plain looking but flexible 1987 BOSS RV‑2. It provides a range of reverbs and it sounds quite natural without too many sibilant digital artefacts, although not quite the soft and cuddly warm tones of traditional analogue reverbs. Still, it does its job very well and it is from the right era (pre‑1990s), which is why it’s here. Interestingly, the high current draw of the digital circuitry in the RV‑2 means that it cannot be powered by batteries and requires a BOSS PSA power supply in order to do its ‘0’ and ‘1’ digi‑thing.
1969 Dallas Arbiter Fuzz Face
This is the first of two iconic classic pedals acquired in 2019. The humble but fabled English Dallas Arbiter Fuzz Face rose to stardom mainly because of none other than Jimi Hendrix. This isn’t one of the earliest Fuzz Faces that used germanium transistors but one of the first to use silicon transistors, this one dating from c.1969. It is amazing what a few cheap electronic components can end up being turned into. Truth be told, I didn’t actually intend to get this pedal. It came along via an eBay auction and I decided to take a punt and put on a (relatively) low bid and… what happened? No‑one came along at the last minute to beat me and I ended up getting it. Yikes! Yes, it was hideously expensive but not as bad as it could have been. Therefore, while it was not exactly a bargain, I suppose it was still a reasonable price for what it is. Fortunately, it delivers its fuzzy glory in all the right ways, so that’s OK then. It is in excellent all‑original condition and in perfect working order, so my initial reticence was soon overcome. It actually looks pretty cool in red too. By today’s standards, its circular form factor does take up a disproportionate amount of pedalboard real estate but, c’mon, it is a vintage fuzz pedal – what’s not to like? The original Fuzz Face was definitely a batteries only zone back in the 1960s and neither is there an LED status light to indicate when it’s on. Great though it undoubtedly is, this is clearly not one of those pedals you’d want to gig with down the local pub, that’s for sure.
1982 Ibanez PT9 Phaser
At totally the other end of the value scale from the Fuzz Face, we have a fairly widely available and averagely collectable 1982 Ibanez PT9 Phaser. CRAVE Effects has somehow accumulated more phasers than any other kind over the years and that’s probably because the late 1970s and early 1980s experienced a surfeit of these simple analogue modulation effects. Let’s be honest, your average phaser really isn’t the most exciting of guitar effects compared to what else is out there, especially in these days of ubiquitous boutique eccentricities. The PT9 is pretty utilitarian and sounds OK, but not necessarily exceptional, which is probably to damn it with faint praise. I’m guessing that Ibanez chose to change their colour scheme from the previous blue/white PT‑909 Phase Tone to the orange/black PT9 in order to compete on looks with the all‑dominating and very orange MXR Phase 90 of the time. I had been on the track of a PT9 to fill a gap in the collection for a while, so the gap was duly filled. Original PT9s are still relatively affordable phasers and they are, perhaps, a good entry point for neophytes to get into vintage effects before getting into more exclusive and expensive fare. Time to move on… Next!
1981 Ibanez TS-808 Tube Screamer Overdrive Pro
… and here is the second iconic classic pedal procured in 2019. The otherwise ordinary green Ibanez TS-808 Tube Screamer Overdrive Pro rose to hallowed status via another guitarist association, this time with the inimitable Stevie Ray Vaughan. Like the Fuzz Face, the original vintage TS‑808s are now inordinately expensive on the vintage effect market, with prices increasing all the time. This was one of those times when I felt a ‘now or never’ moment and bagged a reasonably good one dating from 1981 at just below average price. At this point, I’m going to proclaim ‘emperor’s new clothes’ and say that, while it is undoubtedly a very competent pedal, does it really deserve the unchallenged accolades above all the other competent overdrive pedals out there? Just why we guitarists spend thousands of pounds/dollars on vintage instruments and vintage valve amps and then rely on some dirt cheap solid state components to make them sound ‘better’ is beyond me. To some extent, the same goes for the Fuzz Face but at least that is a down ‘n’ dirty fuzz pedal! I understand all the well‑rehearsed arguments about compensating mid‑boost and clean low gain drive into the front end of an already cooking valve amp. Perhaps I’m missing something else obvious but I really don’t think so. I also know that it goes against the grain to defer from perceived wisdom and to test the TS‑808’s seemingly unassailable reputation. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not knocking the Tube Screamer and what it does. I just believe it is somewhat overrated for the crazy market prices being asked. Anyhow, one of the green meanies is here now and is part of the growing ranks alongside other Ibanez ‘0’ and ‘9’ series pedals. At least I no longer have to keep scanning the market endlessly for a good one at a reasonable price.
1980 MXR Micro Amp
… and right back to the other end of the value scale again with a humble 1980 MXR Micro Amp. Essentially, all a boost pedal does is to increase the signal level hitting the front end of a (valve) pre‑amp, therefore not only adding a bit of volume, but also hopefully some natural compression and a bit of smooth distortion without affecting the underlying tone. Once again, there is something of a question mark about relying on a few cheap bits of electronics to make vintage gear ‘sing’. Having said that, the Micro Amp does its job perfectly well and it can be a really useful tool in the right circumstances. However, let us be clear that it is not exactly the most exhilarating or far out stomp box out there. As an idle observation, it is funny how things come round again given long enough. Outboard pre‑amp pedals are now a ‘big thing’ in the 2020s, albeit a bit more complex than this little MXR. There are many modern‑day compact pedal pre‑amps out there, including the Hudson Electronics Broadcast, Catalinbread Epoch Pre and Fredric Effects 150 Preamp. At least the unassuming little white MXR Micro Amp doesn’t take up much pedalboard space and is oh‑so simple in operation with only a single ‘Gain’ control. Like most un‑modified MXR pedals back in 1980, the Micro Amp only eats batteries for breakfast and doesn’t come with either an LED status light or DC input.
Help Needed
Vintage guitars, effects and amps need attention from time to time to keep them working at their best. While I can undertake basic maintenance, set ups and general TLC, I know that my skills are finite. I am looking for a guitar tech or luthier who can, from time to time, take on a vintage guitar and do some sympathetic remedial work, whether it involves fretwork, electrics, repairs or whatever. I’m also looking for someone who can do occasional work on effects and amps, which is basically electronics, switches, leads, soldering, etc. With over 60 vintage guitars, more than 50 vintage effects and 6 vintage amps, I need some expert help every so often. If there is someone out there with the requisite skillset for any or all of the above, and who is local to SE Cornwall in the UK, I would be interested in making a connection. Anyone interested? Please contact me at the e-mail address at the bottom of every page on the website.
Tailpiece
Actually, I think this is a good place to pause, so I’ll stop there for now. Nine guitars and five effect pedals is enough for one month.
At this point, I must stress that I did not buy any of these items as a pecuniary investment – anyone familiar with CRAVE Guitars will know that is not my motivation. However, given that savings accounts in the UK are currently offering just 0.01% interest rate, I would prefer to be broke and have great vintage guitars, amps and effects to play with and look at. The last recession that began in 2008 apparently saw 30% wiped off the value of vintage guitars, albeit temporarily. To me, it’s still a no brainer, when funds become available, eBay here I come for some vintage gear hunting. The other thing I would add is that all of the new additions are consistent with CRAVE Guitars larger strategic grand plan to conserve ‘Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric’ guitars, amps and effects as important musical and cultural heritage. Oh, and it’s also an unhealthy obsessive addiction as well but I guess you’ve sussed that out already.
At the top of this article I mentioned that there are three themes to work through and I’ve only covered one of them. I am conscious that the ‘History of Modern Music…’ series resulted in lengthy articles and this is, compared to them, quite short. I’m also a bit fatigued by the demands of lengthy researching and writing exercises. Thus, I’ll leave the rest for future article(s). I reckon that it is best to keep these reflective articles relatively consumable. Besides, there really is no rush, is there? Are we going anywhere, anytime soon? No, I thought not.
Believe me, there is still plenty of stuff to be getting on with here at CRAVE Guitars, so I guess I’ll be getting on with stuff then. Who knows what the world will be like in the coming months. Despite the continuing stresses and challenges of COVID‑19 et al, I hope that you’ll return here in due course for your prescribed diet of diversionary diatribes. Stay home, stay safe and stay (in)sane. Remember this simple but important mantra while civilisation unravels around us, Peace, Love & Guitar Music. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “I can see where this is going because I’ve been where it went.”
Hello again guitar fans and welcome to anyone else who may be curious about the big wide world of guitar addiction and obsession. As the great Jimi Hendrix once proclaimed, “Music is a safe kind of high”, so I’m happy to admit my perennial affliction. I trust that 2019 is treating you all well as we begin the move from dreary winter into nascent springtime.
I don’t have any particular theme for this month, so apologies in advance are probably due for what seems to be a generally incoherent rambling round up of various bits and pieces thrown together. One beneficial consequence is that this is a shorter tome than some.
State of Guitarville 2019
In the grand scheme of things, the guitar‑centric sector of the wider music industry is a relatively small but vibrant arena. While the general shrinking and decline of the ‘business’ continues well into the post‑recession era, the core elements seem in fairly good health overall. There is cautious optimism out there within the context of an unpredictable and challenging operating environment. There has been some progress since this time last year but not as much as many commentators might have wished.
Even though I wasn’t at the event, Winter NAMM 2019 held at the end of January in Anaheim, California saw a lot of activity and relatively good business was done. There were few ground‑shaking announcements at the convention but there was the usual excitement about shiny new gear from established brands. It was reassuring to see Gibson back at NAMM after their absence in 2018 and their new CEO is making all the right noises about what to expect from the company. Let’s hope that good intentions translate into achieving the right balance between quality and price, along with appropriate innovations alongside traditional instrument manufacturing. It is interesting that some of the more contentious technologies that were being used to reposition Gibson as a lifestyle company are now likely to be jettisoned in order to re‑establish confidence about, and a focus on, what really matters to their customers.
It is hardly a surprise that digital continues to make significant inroads into the analogue domain that has been the bedrock for so many generations of musicians across the globe. With the influx of ever more convincing digital inventions, one really does have to wonder how long analogue will remain the force it has been up to now. At some point, even the most hardened of luddites will be lured to make the jump either by the metaphorical lure of the carrot or the fear of the stick. There is still some way to go before all the components in a guitarist’s signal chain provide everything that the working professional musician needs for writing, rehearsal, live and recording settings.
The advantage for CRAVE Guitars and many other vintage enthusiasts is that we generally don’t need to worry about learning the operational demands and subtleties of this new‑fangled complex digital stuff and we can stick with what worked for us when we started out, complete with all its charming analogue idiosyncrasies (?!?!). One day, soon, digital will be the default and vintage gear will become a bit like vinyl records in there will be a market for it, even if it ultimately becomes a niche for nerdy specialists. For up‑and‑coming musicians who may not know any different, though, the current‑day smorgasbord of choice is phenomenal and, although the value‑for‑money equation on some equipment can be debated, the benefits are there to be discovered and exploited.
My sense, at the beginning of 2019 is that there is a degree of consolidation in design, manufacturing, marketing and distribution. The on‑going battleground between ‘brick & mortar’ retail and Internet business is still bitterly being fought out. At some point, an equilibrium will be reached where both channels will co‑exist, even if it means that the retail experience will be different from how it is now. Many consumers still greatly value going into a physical store, looking at, trying out and talking about equipment, so they will endure, even if those establishments have to offer other value‑added services on top of the traditional mainstay of shop floor sales. Companies that rely heavily on Internet operations will find overheads increasing, margins tightening and profitability harder to come by, thereby impacting sustainability and beginning to level the playing field a bit.
As far as guitars are concerned, as mentioned above, Gibson is poised for resurgence and Fender seem to be on their game and producing some very competent and attractive models at all price points. PRS are on a creative stretch of their own and doing OK judging by headlines. Gretsch, Rickenbacker and Danelectro also seem to be faring well, perhaps needing a bit of additional cool vibe to secure their future. Rejuvenated brands like Supro and Harmony are aiming to join the ranks as ‘go to’ guitars, while many other familiar names are managing to stay afloat. Acoustically, Martin and Taylor are both actively vying for top dog status with new innovations, which ultimately means some great guitars for the consumer. The last 12 months has seen some small‑scale luthiers go under or simply disappear, which is regrettable but, sadly, not surprising given the volatile international economics of the industry.
In the amp arena, there are three major directions of travel; a) the relentless digital onslaught from the likes of Fractal, Kemper and Line6 among others, b) ranges of very good valve and solid amps from the mainstream names such as Fender, Marshall, Vox, Orange and others, including some faithful reissues of classic models, and c) the continued rise of boutique builders catering for individual tastes in small numbers. We guitarists are, though, a conservative breed. It seems that the valve is dead, long live the valve!
One area where digital is revolutionising sound is on the pedalboard, which is a current ‘big thing’. There are some astoundingly inventive ways of mangling your guitar tone, both in variations of established FX types and some intriguing all‑new creations that take advantage of digital technology. Some exciting products are appearing from the likes of Catalinbread, Strymon, Eventide, Fulltone, Thorpy, Keeley, Electro‑Harmonix and Wampler, to name just a few. If you prefer multi‑effect pedals, then you are likely to have stalwarts like Line6, Boss and Zoom in your sights. Then there are pedalboard switching systems to help you organise your complex myriad of stompers, e.g. the Gig Rig 2 and Headrush. Likewise, the ever‑improving pedalboard power supplies derive from companies such as Truetone, Voodoo Labs and MXR. Looking from the outside, there are some tremendous bits of alluring kit becoming available, way beyond the vision of manufacturers and musicians back in the 20th Century when digital was just starting out. Whatever your budget, the choice, it seems, is yours.
Music publications across the board, including the trade press, are still suffering a seemingly unstoppable shrinkage of their market. Sales of paper magazines continue to dwindle and digital subscriptions are not filling the gap. As a result, high street transactions along with the advertising revenue streams they need to survive are decreasing. As the absolute size of the readership reduces, the risk of becoming uneconomic goes up disproportionately. Strategically, there are few options available and quite what will remain once an inevitable shake‑out occurs remains to be seen. The consequence of this is that the quality of content is likely to suffer in the long term. Music industry journalism needs to adapt, although there are major challenges ahead as people find alternative ways of acquiring the information they need (or, perhaps more worryingly, not bothering at all). Although referring to something slightly different, one is reminded of a whimsical quote from Frank Zappa who suggested that, “Most rock journalism is people who can’t write interviewing people who can’t talk for people who can’t read.” Discuss…
Another area of stagnancy appears to be in the quality of music pervading distribution channels. Video/TV, radio and physical media sales are stagnant at best, while digital streaming is becoming the dominant force. This re‑jigging of supply channels, though, isn’t the issue. Although a sweeping generalisation, it seems that since the turn of the millennium music output has increased in volume and decreased in quality. While this is a highly subjective observation, it is borne out by (vaguely) reliable anecdote across generational divides. There is no doubt that there is some extremely good music being made. However, finding the glittering gems amongst the deluge of dross is difficult and, as a result, the good stuff is constantly battling to reach a mass market, thereby making success a tough task for genuine aspiring talent (rather than vacuous celebrity wannabees!). Financial rewards for artists from streaming services is a travesty and needs addressing before it’s too late. Quite how the tide can be turned to reveal new genre twists and identify the next swathe of outstanding musicians will be a challenge for the 2020s. One can hope that something will happen, as it has always has, it just remains to be seen who, what, when and where it will pop up. Another consequence of generic music produced by generic people is that the desire for genuine instruments will decrease, thereby ultimately affecting sales of guitars.
Getting back to the point, core consumer demand for music gear continues to be resilient, although customers are understandably more discerning and, as a result, potentially more fickle. Reliance on past sales and brand loyalty are continually being chipped away at by targeted marketing and tough rivalry. However, strong competition and the downward pressure on street prices can prove to be a double‑edged sword for price sensitive customers. On the whole, one thing I can easily predict is that the popularity of the guitar will persist no matter what, despite regular prognoses that ‘guitar music is dead’. Quite what the musical landscape will be like in years to come is best left for others to forecast. Whatever happens, it’s going to be an exciting time in Guitarville.
As CRAVE Guitars is based in the UK, it is incumbent on me to mention ‘Brexit’ at this point. There are NO scenarios where leaving the European Union can benefit the country or its citizens. Prices are already increasing, not only because of increased costs and perceptions of risk but also as a result of exploitative selling practices by the unscrupulous trying to secure and bank revenue before the catastrophe strikes. Things are bad enough as they are (remember ‘Rip off Britain’?) and we don’t need any further unnecessary pecuniary pressures. After the severance has occurred and whatever the outcome is of the disastrous ‘deal or no deal’ shenanigans, import barriers, tariffs and currency speculation will affect Britain’s international trade relationships without question. The risk of further recession and national isolation rank high on the concerns of many British businesses. Given the fragile nature of the UK music industry, any weaknesses and threats will be heightened and only those that are able to adapt will survive. Hypocritical UK politicians, pedalling their own prejudices while protecting their personal interests should be ashamed of the damage that will result in the short‑term and aftershocks will continue to impact on the prosperity of the country for generations to come. What is regrettable is that there will be recourse to hold the inept self‑seeking minority accountable for engineering this chaos in the first place and having no idea about how to deliver it successfully. On this basis, I am not optimistic in the slightest. I hope, however, that I am proved wrong. Personally, my view is that there can be no backtracking and we need to get on with making the most of a bad situation. End of whinge!
Repatriation Update
I covered the long‑overdue reunion of a significant proportion of CRAVE Guitars’ vintage instruments in the last article. What I didn’t do is say much about what actually came back. So… if only for completeness, here is the full list of the (42) returnees:
1966 Epiphone Olympic
1966 Fender Coronado II
1965 Fender Duo-Sonic II
1965 Fender Jaguar
1965 Fender Jazzmaster
1965 Fender Musicmaster II
1966 Fender Mustang
1972 Fender Mustang Competition
1977 Fender Precision Fretless Bass
1977 Fender Stratocaster
1983 Fender Stratocaster Dan Smith Era
1972 Fender Telecaster Thinline
1973 Fender Telecaster Deluxe
1974 Fender Telecaster Custom
1988 Fender Telecaster
1983 Gibson Corvus II
1963 Gibson ES-330 TDC
1985 Gibson ES-335 Dot
1982 Gibson Explorer E2
1983 Gibson Explorer
1984 Gibson Explorer
1984 Gibson Explorer Custom Shop Edition
1984 Gibson Explorer ‘Union Jack’ Graphic
1966 Gibson Firebird III
1976 Gibson Firebird Bicentennial
1980 Gibson Flying V2
1975 Gibson Les Paul Standard
1977 Gibson Les Paul Deluxe Gold Top
1989 Gibson Les Paul Custom
1998 Gibson Les Paul Standard DC
2002 Gibson Les Paul Standard
1961 Gibson Melody Maker D
1964 Gibson Melody Maker
1982 Gibson Moderne Korina Heritage
1981 Gibson RD Artist
1965 Gibson SG Junior
1968 Gibson SG Standard
1962 Gretsch 6120 Chet Atkins Double Cutaway Hollowbody
1965 Gretsch 6135 Corvette
1978 Music Man Stingray Bass
1974 Rickenbacker 480
1964 Silvertone 1449 ‘Amp in Case’
Some of the guitars have only been ‘stored’ for a short period of time but many have been incarcerated for nearly 8 years!!! It is these ‘long‑termers’ to which I will probably need to pay most attention in the coming weeks and months. While they were safe and secure, a domestic loft space is definitely not an ideal environment in which to keep vintage guitars for any length of time. The fluctuations in temperature and relative humidity over an extended period are far too great to do them any good at all. Given the circumstances at the time (back in 2011), it was a necessary urgent solution borne out of a severe predicament and I had no practical alternative. I never anticipated that it would take over 7 years to get them all back – I was clearly naïvely deluded in thinking that it would take ‘about’ 6 months at the most to sort things out! Essentially, completely rebuilding one’s entire life from scratch took considerably longer and it has been an extremely arduous journey. Still, we are where we are, none of us can turn the clock back, so one has to be positive, forward looking and take it from here. At least the precious cargo has been rescued and they are now finally back where they belong and, primarily, that is what really matters.
At the moment, the only tangible evidence of the little treasure trove listed above is several stacks of dusty guitar cases. Excitement about the potential is also tinged with an element of guarded apprehension about what will be found when the contents are properly ‘exhumed’ and examined for need of repair and sensitive renovation. If at all possible, any replacement parts needed during restoration will be of the appropriate vintage. That presents a major quandary in 2019-2020. For instance, finding and procuring period‑correct components will be both time consuming and costly. While one could be practical and use modern replacement parts, I prefer to conserve these precious historically significant instruments with genuine components that are as close as possible to the originals as I can find (and afford). Only if that approach fails will I resort to pragmatic use of new stock items. Back in the pre‑recession boom, there was little difficulty in sourcing these useful bits and pieces. Now, however, it has become considerably more difficult.
Not only are vintage spare parts and accessories hard enough to find on the usual hinterwebby platforms, decent vintage guitars and amps also seem to be increasingly scarce, at least in the UK. I’m not sure why this should be. Perhaps people are hanging onto their instruments, perhaps there’s a mistrust/dislike of the usual web sites and the way they are run, or perhaps the post‑recession/pre‑Brexit uncertainty is still suppressing supply. The laws of economics dictate that continued demand combined with a shortage of (finite) supply means only one thing… increased prices. Wading through eBay is bad enough at the best of times but UK sourcing is particularly hard work at the moment. Disadvantageous exchange rates with the USA now seem to be a permanent fixture and, on top of that, CITES is a real bane. In addition, eBay searches are flooded with Japanese items that you just know are bogus. All round it’s not much as much fun as it should be when hunting down scarce ‘most wanted’ artefacts.
I am not treating the repatriation project with any sort of hysterical urgency. The guitars have been exiled for so long that a few more weeks in their new home before I get round to them won’t do any harm. In the first month, I have only attended to 2 out of 42 guitars (1964 Gibson Melody Maker and 1966 Fender Coronado) and I have to be cautiously optimistic that there is no lasting compromise to their integrity. Phew! I hope I don’t get any nasty surprises lurking in the remaining 40 to be uncovered.
Vintage guitars really need to be played. That may be ‘stating the bleeding obvious’ but the difference after a bit of TLC and playing for a few days is phenomenal. There is a transformational change in their playability, sound, feel and looks. I wonder if this may be one reason why some people pick up a (possibly neglected) vintage guitar and find it dull, lifeless and uninspiring. When they magically come back to life again, it is both a relief and a delight. The journey of rediscovering these instruments may well explain why I’m taking my time and not getting very far very quickly. Well, that and the fact that there isn’t a local guitar tech on whom I can rely when more extensive remedial works are required. I know my limitations and any attempt on my part to mess around with repairs and adjustments that are best left to experts would almost certainly be a regrettable mistake.
Another interesting observation is that, while I wasn’t overly attached to some of the guitars all that time ago – a proportion were originally intended to become the staple of a start‑up business – I have now developed an emotional connection to them because of everything I and they have been through over the intervening years. That may be a good thing because I now value them more for what they are than what they may be worth. Also, I simply wouldn’t be able to afford many of them on today’s market, so I’m just glad to have them now. However, it means that I may well have a struggle with my conscience if CRAVE Guitars does become an economic entity and I have to break those newfound relationships. Until that time, the guitar ‘collection’ is an integral part of the family and they are definitely not for sale in the short to medium‑term. My philosophy and attitude mean that the guitars still represent a not‑for‑profit conservation of the musical heritage, rather than any sort of potential gold mine.
As previously mentioned, a pressing priority over the next few months is to provide them with proper accommodation. This means that I need a competent builder to ‘tank’ the cellar and make a suitable home for the guitars. After that, I can possibly start thinking positively about what the future of CRAVE Guitars might one day become. One step at a time.
New in at CRAVE Guitars
So that I don’t fall into the same trap as last year, here’s a quick ‘new arrival’ section. As I predicted back in December 2018, things got off to a slow start this year. In fact, there has been only one purchase in the first 2 months of 2019. Surprisingly, it was an item that was actually on the ‘wanted in 2019’ shortlist.
CRAVE Effects is a relatively modest side venture that runs alongside the guitars and amps. The Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric’ acronym doesn’t actually work 100% in this context because CRAVE Effects comprises a diverse selection of stomp boxes from around the world. Whatevs! I can break my own rules.
One of the ‘classic’ effect pedals that was notably absent was the venerable Ibanez TS‑808 Tube Screamer Overdrive Pro from Japan. This was partly because availability of both the right pedal and the resources needed to acquire it were in short supply. Good ones are few and far between and, when they do come up, they go for silly money. So when an original 1981 TS‑808 turned up on eBay UK for an aforementioned silly price, but arguably not exorbitantly so, it had to be pounced upon. Thus, the notable gap has at long last been duly filled. To think that I could have added another ‘budget’ vintage guitar for the same price as the Tube Screamer puts things into perspective.
As is often the case with vintage Tube Screamers, this example shows typical signs of use (good) but not abuse (bad), so it has just the right amount of mojo, otherwise known as ‘wear and tear’, needed to be confident that it was a safe purchase. Thankfully, apart from a replacement battery snap, it is in all‑original condition and it works very well indeed for a 38‑year old pedal, which is testament to their durability.
As anyone acquainted with my opinionated drivel (or should that be overdrivel in this case?) will know, my heretical views don’t always accord with those of the self‑appointed ‘establishment’. The original TS‑808 is good but I don’t believe it really deserves its insanely elevated and almost mythological status in the minds of many guitarists. Like numerous effects from the late 1970s and early 1980s, it can sound great or grim depending on how it’s used. It is player, guitar, effect and amp dependent, so it needs to be carefully matched in order to make it sound its best. Although new TS‑808 and TS9 reissues are not the same as the old ones, they are still very good overdrive effects. Therein lies a fundamental truth that applies equally for any stomp box made at any time – you pays your money and make your choice. Regardless of my biased view, the much‑imitated and often re‑issued Tube Screamer has become the de facto benchmark for overdrive pedals and there is no getting away from it.
The web site feature on the TS‑808 has already been prepared but, like most gear purchases over the last year, it hasn’t yet been published on the web site. Sigh! Yet another job waiting in the pipeline. Watch this space…
Sign‑off
That’s about it for February 2019. This has been a necessarily short soliloquy compared to many of my verbose outpourings. Inspiration, motivation and time have been in limited supply so far this year and articulating much of any interest at all has been a bit like hard work. Therefore, there is no point in proverbially flagellating a deceased dobbin and it is probably best to stop here for now.
That means that I can get back to the immediate task in hand, which is looking after a few vintage guitars and, hopefully, playing some of them along the way. I’m sure there will be more on this particular topic in coming months. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars ‘Quote of the Month’:“Conscience dictates that we understand right from wrong. Imagine what mankind might achieve if we could work together rather than conflict, and what good could be done if we stopped the immense and irreparable harm we cause.”
Well, here we are at the beginning of 2019. Wonders will never cease. We made it to the start of a new year in the history of the universe, as measured by mankind. For what it’s worth, it feels just like the universe did a human month ago but, heh, what do I know what’s been happening in the infinity of existence we call home since I last put finger to keyboard in the quest for guitar nirvana?
At the beginning of a new year, I would normally pontificate over a ‘state of the village’ observation covering what’s going on out there in guitar land. Not this year, at least not yet. I will mention that, Gibson now has a new President and CEO in James ‘JC’ Curleigh and the company was at winter NAMM in January 2019, so that’s a positive start. Here in the UK, Brexit is about to throw the country into further turmoil and mayhem that can do absolutely no good for the British music industry which is already very fragile after more than a decade of recessionary pressures. What a pathetic mess. Anyhoo… to preserve my vulnerable sanity I’m not going to expound on that any further and it’s time to get down to this month’s business‑as‑usual…
I mentioned in my end‑of‑year roundup in December 2018 that there had been a few acquisitions during the year. I also commented that the CRAVE Guitars web site hadn’t been updated for ages and things were mightily out‑of‑date. Therefore, this month, it seems time to start putting things right. Before I start, I would normally add links to the relevant web site features for the ‘new in’ gear. However, this article has been prepared ahead of publishing the features, so there is currently nothing to link to. Ggrrr. As soon as the features are in place (heck, I took the photos and wrote the narratives months ago, so no excuses!), I’ll add the links in here where they should be.
The Guitars (listed in order of acquisition)
1988 PRS Standard – First to arrive, way back in February 2018 was a stunning 1988 PRS Standard. I had been mulling over the idea of trying to get hold of an early PRS without breaking (into) the bank. I had actually been looking at a fetching early PRS CE in metallic Electric Blue when this pretty baby came to find me, purely by chance. She was local too, so no hassles over importation, couriers and all the risks that go with it.
While many punters might go for the flashy PRS Custom with figured maple cap and fancy bird fretboard inlays, I was really taken with the lovely grain of the all‑mahogany body and the understated but very attractive moon neck inlays. More importantly, it was relatively affordable compared to its more flamboyant relative (the Custom). OK, so it doesn’t have the collector‑requisites of an original case or the case candy but that made owning one achievable. More importantly, it is a very good guitar indeed with 24‑fret Brazilian rosewood fingerboard (pre‑CITES regulations and before PRS voluntarily stopped using it other than on their top‑end models). Everything that is significant, i.e. the guitar itself, is just as it should be and she plays and sounds terrific. She is also in remarkably good condition too, having been used but very well looked after. Result!
PRS guitars was founded by luthier and musician Paul Reed Smith in 1985 and this is one of the early guitars delivered from the original factory in Maryland and before PRS introduced CNC manufacturing. It may not be one of the pre‑company hand‑made instruments but they are very scarce and scarily expensive. While 1988 is modern for CRAVE Guitars, it was still early days for the fledgling PRS. I am very happy with this lovely piece of guitar history, now aging very gracefully at a mere 31 years old.
1988 PRS Standard
1978 Fender Musicmaster – Second to arrive in August 2018 was a cute little 1978 Fender Musicmaster. While this may not be everyone’s first choice as a vintage collectable, it appeared on my radar while looking for a different Fender offset (see below). The reason that this one appealed was simply that the CRAVE Guitars’ family already has Musicmasters from 1959 and 1965, so it was about adding a late example from a different decade.
By the late 1970s, the Musicmaster, like many other budget ‘Made in U.S.A.’ Fenders, was really pared down to its basics. However, it is still a very cool guitar and compares favourably to, although different from, the same model from previous decades. Presented in simple black and white, it represents a degree of purity of purpose that other, more familiar, ‘classics’ don’t exude. The covered single coil neck pickup is the same as the other ‘student’ models and has that funky sound that is characteristic of the ‘baby’ Fender lines. Good guitars from the late 1970s and early 1980s are still relatively affordable but I predict that won’t be the case for long.
All in all, I think she deserves her pride of place in the CRAVE Guitars’ clan and is a great guitar to pick up and play without having to think too much about the controls, meaning one can focus on playing. Regular readers will know that I have a thing for simple, single pickup guitars and also underrated, underdog guitars, so this modest 1978 Musicmaster scores on several fronts.
1978 Fender Musicmaster
1989 Gibson Les Paul Standard – August 2018 was a busy (-ish) time for buying. Third to arrive was a very pleasing wine red 1989 Gibson Les Paul Standard. It may seem strange to go for such a relatively ‘modern’ guitar at just 30 years old this year and right at the upper end of CRAVE Guitars’ criteria for age (pre‑1990). So what was the story here? Well… there are three reasons. The first is that one of the first ‘proper’ guitars I played was a 1970s wine red Les Paul Custom and I’ve wanted one in that gorgeous colour ever since, taking me c.40 years to achieve! The second was pure serendipity, it came up on eBay as an auction and I set a limit simply because guitars like this rarely come up for auction these days. I didn’t think that I’d win it but, lo and behold, although it reached my limit, I won and for a reasonable price too. Another result! I think that the seller was disappointed but that’s the way the cookie crumbles. The third reason is a little more intriguing. The dual humbucking pickups in this guitar are the original short‑lived Bill Lawrence‑designed HB‑L and HB‑R ‘circuit board’ pickups, which Gibson used only in 1988 and 1989. Some may criticise them but to me that is a reason to see what the fuss was about and to try them out for myself.
She certainly isn’t in museum condition but that doesn’t matter to me. I prefer a guitar to be used for its intended purpose, which inevitably means a few signs of being played. She hasn’t been abused, so no big deal, especially given that it wasn’t the most expensive Les Paul out there and certainly cheaper than a new one. A bonus is that she is very light for a Les Paul, which is refreshing. As for those pickups, well, the design is largely cosmetic. Although this guitar is not wired for it, the pickups have 4 conductors so in theory the coils could be split for added tones. To be honest, as she is, she doesn’t sound hugely different to most 1970s humbucker‑equipped Les Pauls. However, what is surprising is that I found that she plays in a different way to other Les Pauls. For some strange reason, it is one to play in a much more relaxed and laid back style. Perhaps it’s the pickups, perhaps not but, to me, it is a guitar to chill out with, rather than to thrash. All in all, it’s a great value‑for‑money guitar that’s only going to get better with age.
1989 Gibson Les Paul Standard
1971 Fender Bronco – Last but not least to arrive, also in August 2018, is a natty little bright red 1971 Fender Bronco. The Bronco was the last of the offset ‘student’ models introduced by Fender in the 1960s. As such, it is often disregarded compared to the Mustangs, Duo‑Sonics and Musicmasters. However, that fact alone makes it of interest to me. OK, so it only has a single pickup but, unlike the Musicmaster, it is located near the bridge, giving it more bite and a distinctive gnarly tone of its own. Like the Mustang, it has a vibrato bridge but unlike its older brother, it is a unique system not used on any other Fender. In my view, the Bronco deserves objective re‑appraisal within its historical context.
The backstory with this one is that it spent some time in Russia before being imported into the UK by the previous owner. That may account for the crazing in the finish that gives it a vintage mojo that suits it down to the ground. She needs a little TLC to get her back up to optimum playability including some careful work on the electrics. One feature that doesn’t affect the sound one iota is the cool use of black and silver control knobs that only appeared between 1967 and 1971. Overall, it’s not a bad little guitar for a 48‑year old. The Fender Bronco was to some extent popularised by Alex Turner of indie band Arctic Moneys, which has tended to attract the attention of collectors and push up vintage prices accordingly. It also tends to distract from the fundamentals of what is a very good, simple guitar.
1971 Fender Bronco
So, 2018 saw the acquisition of two budget Fenders from the 1970s and a Gibson and a PRS from the late 1980s. This outcome was dictated not only by a limited budget but also by space and personal circumstances during the year. In order to get the most out of them, the two Fenders really need some sensitive conservation. Despite the fact that they may not be to everyone’s taste or even qualify for what vintage snobs might consider to be ‘collectable’, I don’t care. I cannot help but express my admiration for all four of them, each in their own way. Apologies for mixing metaphors but I’ve always been one to buck a trend and swim against the tide. On reflection, it wasn’t a bad outcome at all for what was otherwise a demure year.
The Amp
The CRAVE Amps family has seen only one humble ‘new’ arrival during 2018. It may only be modest but it is as welcome as any other adoption.
1978 Fender Champ – you may ask why go for a 1970s ‘silverface’ Champ, especially when there is already a Vibro Champ from the same era in the family? The answer is partly one of keeping things as simple as possible (spot the trend here?) and, once again, opportunity. One came up on eBay and, completely unable to resist temptation, it just had to be mine! Even better, it’s a UK model wired for 240V mains. After not being used for a couple of months, it’s crackling a bit, so it may be in need of a service.
I rate these dinky little Class A valve amps and believe they deserve a much stronger reputation than the unwarranted perception of a beginner’s ‘toy’ amp, when compared to Fender’s bigger ‘classic’ amps. They are light, take up hardly any room and are fine for practice, it breaks up into distortion beautifully and works well as a good platform for effect pedals, particularly in a practice or studio environment. All‑in‑all, a solid little vintage valve amp. What’s not to like?
The Champ is clearly part of the Fender family both sonically and visually, just more compact and, in my view, cuter in all respects. Its simplicity doesn’t mean that it should be overlooked. For information, despite what the purists may assert, the ‘silverface’ Champ retains the electronic design of its predecessors and only the aesthetics changed. The point is that, where it really matters, this is a worthy little amp with quality fundamentals that are now beginning to be appreciated and much emulated by modern high‑end boutique amp builders. That Leo Fender bloke certainly knew what he was doing, even if he was running Music Man when this particular Champ was born in Fullerton, CA.
1978 Fender Champ
The Effect Pedals
Also ‘new in’ at CRAVE Effects in 2018 were a number of vintage (and, as it turns out, not so vintage) analogue effect pedals. I’ve tended to go for the popular brands to which I was exposed as a teenager, so the focus is very much on two American brands – Electro‑Harmonix and MXR Innovations – and two Japanese brands – BOSS and Ibanez. The era of interest is essentially but not exclusively from the mid‑1970s to the mid‑1980s.
Given the choice, the ‘Made in U.S.A.’ effects have always been my favourites, especially the whacky Electro‑Harmonix stomp boxes. This doesn’t mean that I’m not open to other brands, e.g. Maestro, Dod, etc. They are just the ones which I have more knowledge about and experience of using. There are so many options out there, one has to have some sort of rationale to limit the obsession.
The advantage of effects is that they are often relatively cheap to acquire and they don’t take up much room. To keep things brief, I will summarise by brand in alphabetical order.
Boss
1979 BOSS PH-1 Phaser – I already have a green PH-1 but it is ‘player’ grade, so there was an element of upgrading involved here. The incumbent worked fine but it wasn’t in totally original condition, so a slightly better and older one was found. I’ve previously written about the PH-1 and this was essentially a direct replacement, so I won’t repeat that here. Expect the old one to appear on eBay UK at some point.
1979 BOSS PH-1 Phaser
1980 BOSS CE-2 Chorus – The sky blue CE‑2 is a highly regarded ‘classic’ pedal by those in the know and it was a notable gap in the ‘collection’, so a nice one was procured. For once, I followed the trend and found a desirable ‘long dash’, silver screw, black ‘Made in Japan’ label version. Needless to say, it lives up to its envious reputation with a lovely analogue warmth and is simplicity itself to use. It is one of those that cost more than it is worth but, in this case, it was just about justifiable.
1980 BOSS CE-2 Chorus
1986 BOSS PSM-5 Power Supply & Master Switch – The red PSM‑5 is a bit of an oddity in that it isn’t an effect at all. It actually serves two functional purposes for other effects. The first is as a PSA power supply for a number of pedals. This isn’t much use to me, as most of the BOSS pedals are the earlier ones requiring an ACA supply (which actually provide up to 12V, rather than 9V). The second is as a simple effect loop, which can be of use in a basic multi‑pedal setup. It was also a cheap impulse purchase in a weak moment, so here it is.
1986 BOSS PSM-5 Power Supply and Master Switch
Electro-Harmonix
1998 Electro Harmonix Small Stone Phase Shifter – Now this is an anomaly. For one thing, it isn’t strictly vintage and it is outside CRAVE Guitars’ usual age criteria, i.e. up to but not beyond 1989. Electro‑Harmonix failed in c.1984 and part of its revival was to set up operations in Russia in 1990. The main two pedals made in the former USSR were the Small Stone phaser and the Big Muff fuzz (see below). They were based on the original American circuit boards but were constructed in a very different way. The rationale for these pedals piqued my curiosity enough to track them down. Operationally, the Small Stone is very similar to its American predecessor and it sounds as you might expect. The main draw, though, is the distinctly OTT soviet military aesthetic in sinister black and red finish. I thought it was cool enough to live alongside its vintage counterparts.
1998 Electro-Harmonix Small Stone (Russian)
1999 Electro-Harmonix Big Muff ϖ – This is the other non‑vintage pedal from the resurrected Russian incarnation of Electro‑Harmonix. This one isn’t one of the early tank‑like khaki versions, mainly because the soviet manufacturer used proprietary parts that can be a devil to maintain. EHX learnt from this and released the smaller black and yellow version which used more standard components. Crucially, this Big Muff is aurally very different from its American forebears, much more polite and with a different tone altogether. Some say that is modelled more on the Bass Muff, which may explain its tamer timbre. As such, it remains a curiosity in the EHX canon so, as with its eastern bloc comrade above, the black Russian Big Muff gets a look in.
1999 Electro-Harmonix Big Muff π (Russian)
1980 Electro-Harmonix Zipper Envelope Follower – Now we are talking the genuine article. Back in the day when I was playing psychedelic/space rock guitar, I used a Zipper alongside the Electro‑Harmonix Memory Man (echo) and Electric Mistress (flanger). While I have other envelope followers in the ‘collection’, there is nothing before or since quite like the ‘Made in NYC’ Zipper for creating touch sensitive filter sweeps. A vintage Zipper just had to (re‑)join the family and I am glad to say that it is as fantastic as I remember. Far out, man.
1980 Electro-Harmonix Zipper Envelope Follower
Ibanez
1982 Ibanez AD9 Analog Delay – here is another replacement pedal. The existing one works fine but has an unpredictable tendency to lose repeats, which can be irritating. Whether there is a fault I don’t know but I had to find out. The ‘new’ one is much better and works as anticipated. I can now appreciate why the AD9 has become a desirable classic analogue delay on the vintage market. I still prefer my EHX Memory Man but this one almost gives it a run for its money. I’m glad to have it along for the ride. I see the outgoing AD9 as a ‘player’ grade example that may well appear on eBay in due course for someone not so fussy to play with.
1982 Ibanez AD9 Analog Delay
1981 Ibanez AF-201 Auto Filter – My quest to find a creditable challenger to the EHX Zipper led to me track down the rare and collectable ‘0’ series AF-201. It is truly an intriguing little beast with a lot more controllability over the analogue filter’s parameters. Lots of sliders and switches but no rotary knobs at all. Therein lies its weakness for me. Finding just the right combination of controls can take a bit of exploration and it can be hard to recall a particular setting. What it does, it does well and it is a fascinating pedal to experiment with. The AF‑201 takes a different approach to other envelope filters.
1981 Ibanez AF 201 Auto Filter
1981 Ibanez GE-601 Graphic Equalizer – To be honest, I have never been a fan of graphic equalizers either in hi‑fi or guitars – very 1970s. However, I admit that the ability to tweak EQ can be useful in certain circumstances. After acquiring the MXR version also in 2018 (see below), I thought I would try the Ibanez ‘0’ series equivalent. They both do the same job and the Ibanez has the major advantage of a foot switch, so instant tonal variation can be applied, which also means that it doesn’t have to be ‘always on’. The downside for me is that it doesn’t have the boost/cut range of the MXR and therefore doesn’t work so well as a creative tool. I guess you pays your money and takes your choice depending on what you want to use it for.
1981 Ibanez GE-601 Graphic Equalizer
1983 Ibanez SD9 Sonic Distortion – Anyone with a solid grounding in guitar lore will be aware of the ‘holy grail’ of overdrive pedals for many, the venerable Ibanez TS‑808 Tube Screamer Pro. Well, the snot green SD9 takes the basic template and pumps it up with a shed load of steroids. A subtle pedal this is not. The ‘9’ series superseded the ‘0’ series, so it is both visually and tonally a very different animal compared to the ‘classic’ Tube Screamer. If you want more ‘meat on the bone’ without the OTT fuzziness of, say, an EHX Big Muff, the SD9 may fit the bill.
1983 Ibanez SD9 Sonic Distortion
MXR
1975 MXR Blue Box – here is another ‘upgrade’ pedal. The existing 1977 ‘script’ logo Blue Box was a bit of a bitsa. Again, it worked (if you can call what it does as working!) but it wasn’t exactly a pretty example, with a changed footswitch and baseplate. I paid well over book for the new one from a London dealer on the grounds that it was all‑original and, as is always the risk buying on the hinterwebby thing, this one arrived, also with a changed footswitch. Argh! A clear case of caveat emptor (buyer beware) if ever there was one. Other than that, it is original and in better condition. The Blue Box is a weird device combining a fuzz and an octave generator, and it sounds just as crazy as the other one – if you want manic aural chaos, this is a pedal to seek out. The outgoing one is likely to make an appearance on eBay at some point.
1975 MXR Blue Box
1976 MXR Phase 45 – The original ‘script’ logo MXR Phase 90 has become deservedly legendary over the decades. The ‘collection’ already has a vintage 1977 ‘block’ logo Phase 90, so this all‑original ‘script’ logo Phase 45 was seen as a complementary purchase. It is subtler and smoother than its big brother and, to my ears just as flattering. If you want soft swooshes, the Phase 45 is perfect and, like the Phase 90, is simplicity itself to use, just one control knob to grapple with.
1976 MXR Phase 45
1980 MXR Six Band Graphic Equalizer – I was generally scouting around for other offbeat pedals when I came across this diminutive little pedal. At the time, I didn’t have a graphic equalizer and was content to use guitar and amp controls. Then I got to thinking about what it might be able to do and the rest, as they say, is history. I took the plunge in a susceptible moment and here is the little blue SBGE (for short). It is always on, so no footswitch, which may be a limiting factor for many. However, when the cut/boost sliders are pushed to extremes (i.e. other than for basic EQ adjustment), the tonal abilities are quite fascinating. I now think of the pedal not as a glorified active tone control but as a creative utensil to transform an ordinary guitar’s limited tonal range into something else altogether. A little blue miracle worker.
1980 MXR Six Band Graphic Equalizer
Other
1970s Colorsound Swell (volume pedal) – I’m not quite sure of the age of this swell pedal without dismantling it, so for now it is just ‘1970s’. It works fine, is in very good condition and does just what it says on the tin. Volume pedals are nothing particularly exciting but they can add an extra bit of flexibility to proceedings. To be upfront, I got this one as it works better than the VOX (see below).
1970s Colorsound Swell
1960s VOX Volume/Expression – here’s another pedal that I bought on a whim, fancying a bit of the old violin‑type swell that a volume pedal could provide and I didn’t have one lying around. This one came up and, while being ergonomically modified (they originally were designed for use with VOX keyboards and came with a captive output lead), it seemed an interesting purchase. Some of these early 1960s effects are now becoming quite rare and collectable, so I couldn’t let it pass. The issue with this one is an overly scratchy potentiometer and I’m now in that dilemma of whether to replace it with a modern reliable pot or leave it for someone to decide at some point in the future. I’m still mulling that predicament over.
1960s VOX Volume
So… have any of these purchases made a great deal of difference and have they changed my opinion about vintage effects? Not really. In my view, the American pedals are just so much better suited to what I’m looking for than their Japanese and European counterparts. This is a very subjective value judgement and it should not be seen as America = good, elsewhere = bad. The far eastern pedals are very good. It’s just the way things have panned out for me personally.
The CRAVE Effects’ ‘collection’ is now much broader (although not by brand) and I have learned a lot from the experience. Sadly for the bank account, I feel the topic as a whole needs further investigation. The guitars remain the primary focus but these old analogue pedals certainly play their part in the grand scheme. Modern effect units have become, generally, far too complicated for my poor brain to comprehend, so I’ll stick with the pure and simple. No real surprise there.
There is no ‘magic’ to old/vintage gear and it won’t transform anyone into the next Van Halen. Modern tech is wonderful and that’s where the future of mainstream music production lies. The magic stems from the musician and the equipment is simply there to shape the tone that the musician hears and wants to communicate with the listener. My fascination in the ‘old school’ technology is on one hand personal preference and on the other to act as a steward of these gems the future.
Guitar Repatriation News
OK, so that’s the ‘new in’ at CRAVE Guitars from 2018. The really BIG news is actually of major significance to the enterprise and could come under a strange heading of ‘old in’ in 2019.
Now… here’s the thing… I may not have explained a particular episode from the past, so it is time to put things in context. Due to life changing events back in 2010, the majority of CRAVE’s guitars had to go into enforced exile in 2011 for as long as it would take to get things back in order. Some of them have been kept in less than ideal (but thankfully safe) storage for nearly eight years. Others have been stored on a more temporary basis having been swapped in and out over the years.
At this point, I have to give a very special shout out to my close friend Pete who looked after them for me and without his compassion (and loft space), who knows what would have happened to them. I am immensely grateful to him for doing it and putting up with me over the years. I never expected it to take as long as it has but that, I guess, is how life goes.
The major change since last month’s article is that on 21st January 2019, a total of 42 guitars – 40 of them vintage, ranging from 1961 to 1989 – were reunited with me and the other guitars that were already here. While it is a massive relief to have them all in the same place again, their arrival presents two specific challenges that now must be addressed during 2019.
Repatriation Guitar Cases
The first is to work through the guitars, evaluate their condition and assess what remedial work needs to be done. I am certain that some major TLC will be required to get them all back into good playing order. At best, this will mean a general setup, cleaning and pampering, checking electrics and all the variables associated with corrosion, restringing them all, and playing them back to health. Guitars should be played to keep them in tip top condition, so that is one particular task that I’m looking forward to.
As Cheap Trick guitarist Rick Nielsen said, “Guitars are meant to be played, and they’re happiest when they’re making music”. The improvement in the Melody Maker after a few days of being used was proof positive.
Note: I hate re‑stringing guitars at the best of times but this will be a mammoth trial of endurance, a test of patience and a pitting of my strength of will against bits of wire. I am convinced that guitar strings are a risk to health and potentially downright lethal!
I was encouraged by the first guitar out of its case, my cute 1964 Gibson Melody Maker. The strings were rusty and she wouldn’t get/stay in tune, a few frets choke out (easily sorted) and the volume pot is scratchy (I can’t recall if it was like that before). The finish looks a bit dull and the metalwork a bit tarnished but nothing serious. After 3‑4 days, the benefits of being played were immense; it feels like it is coming back to life and sustains beautifully. The electrics need sorting out but it looks promising and not too bad for a 55‑year old. If the other 41 are no worse, I will be utterly amazed and truly delighted. As ‘they’ say, expect the worst and hope for the best. Fingers crossed.
The second challenge, I actually alluded to back in December 2017 in my end‑of‑year roundup. The ‘new’ house has a dark, damp, grotty cellar that I was hoping to make into a suitable home for the guitars during 2018. Unfortunately, this did not happen, as other priorities had to be undertaken first, e.g. a new roof! Converting the cellar into a usable space means ‘tanking’ it to keep the space and the rest of the structure dry, as well as some means of controlling temperature, humidity, ventilation and security.
As with all good intentions, this major project was meant to be completed prior to the guitars’ repatriation. However, as most of these things go in my life, it has happened the wrong way round. It may, though, spur me onto getting the ‘guitar room’ appropriately reconditioned in 2019, resources permitting of course. I should mention that this is not some luxurious mansion with an extensive basement area, it is very small, built into a cliff, with no natural light or ventilation and, unless one is naturally vertically challenged there is no headroom, as it is only about 5 feet (1.5 metres) high, and that is before any work is done on it. Also, access to it is far from easy to put right and will never be ideal. Nevertheless, it is better than nothing and, once it is finished, it should provide safe and secure accommodation for the instruments, amps and effects. In the meantime, I’m sleeping amongst a few piles of dusty guitar cases. Still, as a self‑confessed guitar nut, there are worse things I can think of.
CRAVE Guitars – Cellar
You never know, having a wider choice of vintage guitars to play may even improve my musicianship, as they are inspiring to pick up and use – God knows, my playing needs to improve and not just to do justice to these fine instruments!
There are other benefits of reuniting the ‘collection’, other than getting to play them. I should be able to take new photographs (and perhaps even videos?!) to populate the web site. New images can accompany the revised narrative that has already been partially prepared. There may also be an opportunity to liven up social media output as, frankly, I’m bored of posting the same old pictures from a decade ago.
I have long wanted to share my passion with others who may have a similar persuasion and it would be good to feature some or all of them in some sort of publication. If anyone is interested, give me a while to spruce them up and let me know. I think they are ‘cool & rare’ and just may be of interest to a wider audience.
I am hopeful that, despite the many setbacks that have led to where things are today, this may just be the turning point in the evolution of CRAVE (Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric) Guitars that I’ve been waiting for and a launch pad to better things. One day, maybe.
Outro
I think that has caught up with most developments taking place at CRAVE Guitars over the last year. While the ‘Potted History of the Guitar’ series was a great thing to do, it’s also good to get back to the personal ethos underpinning CRAVE Guitars. The prematurely trailed follow up to the ‘Potted History’ series is having to be put back, as I haven’t yet done the background research to get started. The reintegration work associated with the no‑longer‑exiled guitars will also take up considerable time and effort in coming weeks and months, so who knows what will appear here next month. Why not come back at the end of February and find out?
The invigorating prospect of having so many great vintage instruments to hand will hopefully act as a catalyst for change and progress. I’m still not tempted to set up CRAVE Guitars as a business; I just don’t have the ‘killer instinct’ to trade and, anyway, the sentimental connection has become strong. So, it looks like the not‑for‑profit mission to conserve this particular aspect of popular music heritage will continue, at least for the foreseeable future. Whatever transpires, the venture will certainly keep me busy for a while and that has to be seen as a positive.
Just in case you didn’t know this already, vintage guitars are AWESOME!
Now… where on Earth do I start with the ‘old in’? I think it might just be a case of, ‘eenie meenie miney mo…’ and see what happens. Until next time…
CRAVE Guitars ‘Quote of the Month’: “I would rather fail at being great than succeed at being mediocre”