Skip to Main Content
  • Home
  • Galleries
    • Fender Gallery
    • Gibson Gallery
    • Other Makes Gallery
    • Browse All Gallery
    • Bass Gallery
    • Effects Gallery
    • Amplifiers Gallery
    • Instagram Gallery
    • Impressions Gallery
    • YouTube Videos
    • Archive Gallery
  • Features
    • Guitars
    • Basses
    • Effects
    • Amplifiers
    • Brands
  • Musings
  • Resources
    • Key Instruments
    • Key People
    • Guitars and Guitarists
    • A-Z of Vintage Guitar Gear
    • CRAVE Guitars ‘Musing’ Articles
    • Guitar Albums
    • Guitar Books
    • Internet Links
    • Local Interests
  • CRAVE
    • Quick Poll
    • About
    • The CRAVEman
    • Sourcing
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
  • For Sale
CRAVE Guitars

CRAVE (Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric) Guitars

CRAVE Guitars logo

27 Feb 2026

February 2026 – Recent New ‘Old’ In at CRAVE Guitars

by CRAVEGuitars | posted in: History, Introduction, News, Observations, Opinion | 0

Prelude

WELL, A HEARTY HALLOO AND AN AMICABLE AHOY dear readers. I hope 2026 is treating you well so far and is all hunky‑dory in your world. NB. ‘hunky‑dory’ is American reduplicated slang generally meaning ‘safe, satisfactory and pleasant’. It first appeared in print in a collection of minstrel songs, ‘Essence Of Old Kentucky’ (1862) by George Christy. ‘Hunky Dory’ (without the hyphen) is also the fourth studio album by the legendary David Bowie from 1971.

It is almost unbelievable to think that we are already six years since the Covid‑19 outbreak and four years since Russia invaded Ukraine but here we are, racing through 2026 at a rate of knots (NB. A knot is one nautical mile per hour. A nautical mile is about 1.15 land miles).

“With your smiling faces round, ‘Tis then I’m hunkey dorey” – Christy’s Minstrels

After a challenging winter for many, it will soon be time to welcome the refreshing renewal of spring (at least up here in the northern hemisphere). It is a time to be optimistic and enthusiastic about life’s opportunities in the spirit of rejuvenation. If only such a prophecy could be self‑fulfilling.

Going against natural tendency, I will be trying to keep this month’s article short and sweet for a change. Included within that brevity is my message to the insane malefactors creating misery and mayhem is simple; repent from your malevolent ways and make a better world for everyone and everything. It really isn’t difficult.

“I hope that in this year to come, you make mistakes. Because if you are making mistakes…you’re Doing Something” – Neil Gaiman (1960‑)


This Month at CRAVE Guitars…

Believe it or not, there hasn’t been a dedicated article covering ‘what’s new’ at CRAVE Guitars for nearly five years, since, ‘August 2020 – Even More Whazzup at CRAVE Guitars’. How did that happen? That post was immediately prior to ‘the hiatus’ (September 2020 to August 2023).

There was a sub‑section, part of a larger article, called, ‘New’ Old Gear’ at the end of 2023 in the article, ‘December 2023 – CRAVE Guitars: Three Years in Review’ but it was only a snapshot at the time and covered acquisitions over ‘the hiatus’.

While vintage guitar gear is, by definition, the antithesis of ‘new’, this month’s content is all about the anticipation and discovery of finding fascinating ‘new’ old things. The vintage items covered herein may be decades old but they are ‘new’ to CRAVE Guitars and they change the overall dynamic of the ‘collection’. Plenty of images and links this month. No AI at all, anywhere.

“Step through new doors. The majority of the time there’s something fantastic on the other side” – Oprah Winfrey (1954‑)

So… even though vintage guitar gear purchases have slowed down considerably over the last couple of years (as regular readers will know, due to fund and space limitations) it seems long overdue to bring things up‑to‑date.

This month’s ‘quotes of wisdom’ are relevant to the notion of new experiences in life and breaking away from old, possibly restrictive, practices. Bring it on.

“You never know what you can do until you try, and very few try unless they have to” – C.S. Lewis (1898‑1963)


New Members of the CRAVE Guitars Family 2025‑2026 (15)

Included in this article are CRAVE Guitars’ purchases since the start of 2025 to‑date.

Guitars and basses generally cost a lot of money and take up a lot of real estate, so given practical limitations, guitar/bass purchases have been restricted to just two guitars and one bass.

Vintage amplifiers are also space hungry and also tend to cost a lot. Given that CRAVE Amps are a lower priority, none have been acquired recently.

Effect pedals are considerably cheaper and take up little space, so stomp box arrivals have been more abundant. In contrast to other parts of CRAVE Guitars, there has been a significant ‘investment’ in CRAVE Effects over the last 12 months.

For more in‑depth information about each of the instruments and effects, follow the links after each summary to take you to a full feature page on the web site (each opens in a new browser tab).

“I’m always doing things I can’t do. That’s how I get to do them” – Pablo Picasso (1881‑1973)


Vintage Guitars/Basses (3):

Just three vintage guitar and bass acquisitions over the past couple of years. Scant quantity, thankfully, does not equate to compromised quality.

1966 Fender Electric XII (+ case) – This particular guitar was the focus of CRAVE Guitars’ article of June 2025, ‘Challenging Vintage Guitar Snobbery: A Cautionary Tale’. Why? I have tried to avoid refinished guitars but the opportunity to pick up a vintage Fender Electric XII at a price I could afford made me re‑evaluate my view on the practice. It arrived without a case and, because the Electric XII has unique proportions, tracking down a case specifically made to fit it was a nightmare, let alone an original 1966 Fender case. Eventually, I found a dedicated case; not vintage but it provides essential protection. The XII may have been refinished but it is still a very cool guitar.

Article: June 2025 – Challenging Vintage Guitar Snobbery: A Cautionary Tale

Feature – 1966 Fender Electric XII

1966 Fender Electric XII

1984 Guild X‑79 Skyhawk (+ case) – I had been looking for cool Guild guitars for a while now, hoping to find a good S‑300 or S‑100. In 2025, my son and I attended a heavy metal gig. That acted as a catalyst to look for a vintage ‘Made in USA’ Guild Skyhawk and, fortunately, this one came along. It is very characteristic of the ‘extreme’ art of guitar manufacturing during the 1980s. The original case was too far past its sell‑by date, so a similar vintage‑correct case was found to keep it safe (it’s another guitar with unique proportions). The Guild Skyhawk is very distinctive and a very cool under‑the‑radar ‘metal’ axe and a great addition to CRAVE Guitars.

Feature – 1984 Guild X‑79 Skyhawk

1984 Guild X-79 Skyhawk

1983 Kramer ‘The Duke’ Deluxe Bass – I just missed out on a rather sweet Kramer 450B bass with its distinctive aluminium neck and ‘tuning fork’ headstock, so it was while I was searching for Kramer instruments that I came across this interesting instrument, characterising a trend in the 1980s for compact, portable headless basses. At first glance, it might be mistaken for a Steinberger bass but it is actually quite different. The ‘Made in USA’ Kramer The Duke may not be a ‘classic’ but it is a very good vintage bass guitar, very unusual in all respects and quite a relative vintage bargain, which makes it all the better for CRAVE Basses. Cool.

Feature – 1983 Kramer ‘The Duke’ Deluxe Bass

1983 Kramer The Duke Deluxe

“Do one thing every day that scares you” – Eleanor Roosevelt (1884‑1962)


Vintage Effect Pedals (12):

Back in October 2025, the CRAVE article, ‘Vintage Guitar Gear Collections Within a Collection: Part II – CRAVE Effects’ got me thinking about focusing on a brand and its models, rather than the usual diverse way of doing things. Actively creating a ‘collection within a collection’ from scratch is a completely new approach for CRAVE Effects. That is why there are a dozen pedals from only two American brands. To revisit that article, follow the link below (opens in a new browser tab).

Article: October 2025 – Vintage Guitar Gear Collections Within A Collection: Part II – CRAVE Effects

This alternative methodology led directly to buying a number of DOD FX series effect pedals in a buying spree. Previously, CRAVE Effects only had the glorious ‘large box’ DOD Analog Delay 680. DOD was always a reliable budget American brand, releasing large numbers of pedals at realistic prices between 1973 and 1996. Some DOD FX series pedals (1982‑1996) were better than others and this is evident in the initial trawl. I have a feeling that there may be more to come.

1987 DOD FX10 Bi‑Fet Preamp – One of those behind‑the‑scenes pedals that do an awful lot without sounding like it. Originally conceived to boost passive acoustic/electro‑acoustic pickups, the FX10 was widely adopted by guitarists and bass players to boost, balance or buffer pedal boards and/or long cable runs, something it does rather well. While not producing distortion in itself, it can be used to overdrive inputs of other pedals/amplifiers. The FX10 was often used as an always‑on pedal.

Feature – 1987 DOD FX10 Bi‑Fet Preamp

1987 DOD FX10 Bi-Fet Preamp

1991 DOD FX17 Wah-Volume Controller Pedal (+PSU) – Very few people even know of the existence of the FX17. It is nothing like any other DOD pedal or wah‑wah, volume pedal or voltage controller. No pots. No inductors. Clever active electronics. Yup, the FX17 was innovative and, to be honest, it is an exemplary piece of kit that should be more broadly accepted. It can be a bit fiddly to use but it is worth the effort. Its technology hasn’t (to my knowledge) been used since by DOD or anyone else.

Feature – 1991 DOD FX17 Wah-Volume Controller Pedal

1991 DOD FX17 Wah-Volume Controller Pedal

1995 DOD FX25 Envelope Filter – The FX25 is another of DOD’s better pedals. It isn’t necessarily refined but it is effective at producing cool funky, skanky auto‑wah effects. It may also not be the most versatile but its simplicity allows one to focus on playing rather than knob twiddling. It doesn’t shout from the roof tops but neither does it hide its light under a bushel (NB. an idiom from the book of Matthew in the New Testament of the Christian Bible).

Feature – 1995 DOD FX25 Envelope Filter

1995 DOD FX25 Envelope Filter

1990 DOD FX50‑B Overdrive Plus – An overdrive pedal based on its short‑lived predecessors, the DOD Overdrive Preamp 250 and the DOD FX50. While seeming to be a standard overdrive pedal, the ‘Drive’ control features an integral ‘Boost’ function that pushes it clearly into dirty distortion territory, giving it a punchy range of gritty sounds that other overdrive pedals might struggle to achieve. Perhaps it’s not the best overdrive effect out there (Ibanez Tube Screamer?) but some credible crunchy blues/rock tones can be dialled in easily.

Feature – 1995 DOD FX50‑B Overdrive Plus

1990 DOD FX50-B Overdrive Plus

1992 DOD FX52 Classic Fuzz – A relatively understated fuzz pedal from DOD. The intention was to emulate the ‘classic’ fuzzy sounds of British germanium powered effects like the Tone Bender or Fuzz Face. While it doesn’t respond to touch as well as the best, it does produce some nice fuzzy distortion. Not an all‑out mega fuzz fest like the best of the breed (Electro‑Harmonix Big Muff π?) but OK enough, especially with the integral ‘Boost’ on the ‘Fuzz’ control to give it some nicely sustaining bite.

Feature – 1992 DOD FX52 Classic Fuzz

1992 DOD FX52 Classic Fuzz

1991 DOD FX54 Attacker – The name on the box doesn’t tell you what this effect does. It combines a simple compressor with a distortion effect. OK, so it isn’t the most flexible of compressors or the most distinctive of overdrives but the combination of the two is relatively unusual and it does a credible job at sounding different from the offerings of other manufacturers. The FX54 also features the same ‘Boost’ function as some other DOD pedals (see above). Maybe it is not a cultural icon by any means but a good pedal choice for experimental noise rock and out‑there contemporary psych.

Feature – 1991 DOD FX54 Attacker

1991 DOD FX54 Attacker

1988 DOD FX56 American Metal – The FX56 is possibly the best DOD FX series for heavy/hard rock distortion. This is a bit of a brute. Subtlety isn’t its strong point. Unlike other distortion pedals from DOD, it doesn’t feature the ‘Boost’ on the distortion control. Instead, it was the first DOD pedal to feature a ‘Presence’ control to provide treble boost. The FX56 spawned two other distortion variations on a theme, the FX57 Hard Rock Distortion and the FX58 Metal Maniac. Very 1980s MTV ‘hair metal’ and all the better for it. Good one.

Feature – 1988 DOD FX56 American Metal

1988 DOD FX56 American Metal

1988 DOD FX65 Stereo Chorus – Late 1980s and early 1990s recordings were saturated with chorus effects. Chorus was trendy and everywhere. Originally designed to produce a sound akin to a 12‑string from a 6‑sting guitar or to emulate a rotating Leslie speaker cabinet. Chorus works by adding a small delay and a slight detune, making for a distinct shimmery sound that we recognise today as the chorus effect. The FX65 does a reasonable job amongst a sea of other chorus pedals out there but it doesn’t really stand out from a big crowd. Good but not great.

Feature – 1988 DOD FX65 Stereo Chorus

1988 DOD FX65 Stereo Chorus

1988 DOD FX80‑B Compressor Sustainer – In my opinion, the FX80‑B was the real let‑down of the FX Series pedals acquired so far. To my admittedly jaundiced ears, it doesn’t seem to do very much at all compared to competitor compressors like the MXR Dyna Comp. Yes, it boosts the whole signal but it misses the point of boosting a weak signal and limiting a strong signal to even out a guitar’s ADS (Attack, Decay, Sustain) envelope or to provide a blooming lasting sustain trail. I was so disappointed with the first example, thinking that it may be faulty, I bought a second and it was the same. Disappointing DOD. Could and should have done better.

Feature – 1988 DOD FX80 B Compressor Sustainer

1988 DOD FX80-B Compressor Sustainer

This period has also been one of ‘completing the set’ of MXR compact effect pedals. That doesn’t mean it is a comprehensive collection of all the multiple variants. Rather it is representative of the MXR catalogue during the 1970s and 1980s.

1980 MXR Micro Chorus – A diminutive little yellow block with just a single control and a footswitch, following the approach that MXR took with the iconic Phase 45 and Phase 90. Sometimes less is more and MXR proved that point with an effective mono chorus effect in a straightforward package. OK, so it isn’t hugely flexible but there is the large box MXR Stereo Chorus to fulfil that role. In a flooded chorus effect market during the 1980s, the MXR Micro Chorus made a credible and popular contribution.

Feature – 1980 MXR Micro Chorus

1980 MXR Micro Chorus

1975 MXR Noise Gate Line Driver – Another of those behind‑the‑scenes pedals that does its job quietly and effectively but doesn’t make its presence too intrusive. Used last in a signal chain, it is intended to reduce background noise and hum, common in high gain environments. Unusually for a stomp box, it also has a low impedance XLR output for Direct Input (DI) into stage/studio mixing desks. The ‘Threshold’ control is used to eliminate most of the unwanted noise without adversely affecting the musical signal. This example is a very early, rare ‘Bud’ box model, with a hand‑wired circuit and the spidery ‘script logo’.

Feature – 1975 MXR Noise Gate Line Driver

1975 MXR Noise Gate Line Driver

1977 MXR Phase 90 (‘Block Logo’) – A ‘contrast and compare’ pedal for CRAVE Effects. It is a complement to the existing 1977 MXR Phase 90 (‘Script Logo’). Both were made in the same year, both have the same circuitry. The only difference is the cosmetic screen printing on the front of the pedal. Yet, one is more highly in demand and attracts much higher values on the vintage effect pedal market. Why? They are effectively the same great phase pedal with distinctive and discrete aesthetics. You may have seen the ‘script logo’ stomp box before but both are shown here for comparison.

Feature – 1977 MXR Phase 90 (‘Script Logo’)

1977 MXR Phase 90 (‘Script’ Logo)

Feature – 1977 MXR Phase 90 (‘Block Logo’)

1977 MXR Phase 90 (‘Block’ Logo)

There you go. Possibly not the most exciting haul of vintage guitar gear purchases. However, they do help to fill out CRAVE Guitars’ ‘collection’ and to provide a bit more diversity.

“I’m always moving forward and trying new things” – Robert Redford (1936‑2025)


Final Thoughts About Recent New In at CRAVE Guitars

I would much rather have been getting some lovely vintage guitars and basses. Regrettably, I had to miss out on some very appealing vintage instruments over the last two years, as well as a couple of very desirable vintage valve amps. I really do hope to get back to what really matters at some point in the future. I am not downplaying the effect pedals, all of which are an integral part of the vintage guitar gear landscape.

Specifically on effect pedals, the quest goes on. I have a hunch that there are a few more DOD FX series pedals to find while they are affordable and before the ‘collecterati’ discover them and drive the price out of reach of enthusiasts. It’s already starting, so the fuse is already burning.

“Unless you try to do something beyond what you have already mastered, you will never grow” – Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802‑1882)

As mentioned previously, the arbitrary cut off of year of 1989 has been relaxed for effect pedals with the most recent addition dating to 1995. CRAVE Guitars currently has a couple of newer guitars and several effect pedals that date to the 1990s, which may make an appearance in due course if the cut‑off is extended to 1999 – the end of the 20th Century seems a clear enough ‘vintage’ boundary.

For the first time, the number of effect pedals exceeds the number of vintage guitars/basses. This doesn’t really matter, it isn’t a competition.

“We keep moving forward, opening new doors, and doing new things, because we’re curious and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths” – Walt Disney (1901‑1966)


Strategic Positioning of CRAVE Guitars

Having reflected on things generally, I don’t think that there is anyone else doing anything out there quite like CRAVE Guitars/Basses/Effects/Amps, which is encouraging. So perhaps a discrete niche has been created after all. Yay! Time to build on it.

The first tangible evidence of a slight incremental change is a refreshed CRAVE Guitars’ logo and avatar, featuring a new‑look stylised faded American flag behind the CR ‘body’ of the guitar part of the logo. I haven’t decided yet whether it is a short‑term ‘special edition’ logo or whether it might become permanent. I like it, although it will take some getting used to after a decade of the clean, plain logo. The high‑contrast logos will still be retained for use where it matters. There may be other variants in the future – watch this space.

I remain concerned that CRAVE Guitars is currently in a bit of a limbo (thankfully not purgatory) where it is what it is and there is only so much one can squeeze out of a static showcase. In order to become something exceptional, it needs to be bigger and more diverse. It isn’t a lack of ambition or enthusiasm on my part, just the real world constraints of time, space and money.

Rising price pressures on the classic ‘golden age’ (pre‑1965) are such that any increase in guitar numbers is likely to be focusing on newer vintage guitars, now that late 1960s and early 1970s guitars have also caught the attention of the heinous and rapacious ‘collecterati’, who prioritise financial ‘return on investment’ over musical integrity. For those who have been part of the CRAVE Guitars’ journey, it gives me no pleasure to report that ‘I told you so’. There is plenty of great guitar gear in the 1980s and early 1990s, which may add to the pressure to flex the arbitrary 1989 cut‑off for instruments and amps as well as effect pedals.

“Life is trying things to see if they work” – Ray Bradbury (1920‑2012)

As every guitar player who experiences G.A.S. (Guitar Acquisition Syndrome), CRAVE Guitars has an extensive ‘Most Wanted’ list of guitars, basses, effects and amps. It grows faster than purchases. At what point this obsession becomes excessive, CRAVE Guitars has to determine. I suspect that there will always be ‘more’ stuff to add to the ‘collection’. Hopefully there will be plenty more to come over the next few months/years.

Shifting the focus a bit, I have no current plans to monetize the enterprise, so there will be no advertising (another anathema) to obscure the content. CRAVE Guitars will most likely remain a modest not‑for‑profit showcase (or whatever else it might be). I am a firm believer that, unless there are unavoidable imperatives, organic development and incremental growth are probably the sensible strategy. It isn’t quick or exciting but it makes for a good strategic fit with my personal perspective on life, the universe and everything as well as my unending quest for uncovering the secret of 42 (thanks again to the awesome Mr. Douglas Adams).

“If we cannot find our account in one world we shall in another. It is a great pleasure to see and do new things” – Voltaire (1694‑1778)


CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Album of the Month’

A double (or should that be dubble) dose of dubby electronica trippiness for you this month. In the 2010s, British electronica duo, Alex Paterson and Jimmy Cauty (The Orb), linked up with Jamaican dub reggae legend, Lee “Scratch” Perry to explore what ‘dub’ means from both perspectives. The result was a pair of albums released a year apart. They are two separate albums but I prefer to think about them as a complementary set of tracks.

The Orb – The Orbserver In The Star House (2012) & The Orb – More Tales From The Orbservatory (2013): The best thing to do here, I reckon, is not to approach these albums from a critical listening point of view. That simply spoils the enjoyment to be found in the resulting soundscapes. Also, it is not a good idea to approach these albums purely from either The Orb’s or Lee Perry’s perspective. The blurring of dub electronica reggae tropes is what matters here. There are 22 tracks covering 105 minutes overall. Perry had largely lost his marbles and his vocals are a typical rambling stream of consciousness, so I tend to think of his voice as an instrument supplementing the instrumental backing tracks. Taking the albums as an immersive musical experience allows the chilled out listener to wallow in the laid back downtempo reggae electronic dub vibes. Groovy baby!

The Orb Featuring Lee “Scratch” Perry

OK, so they may not be either The Orb’s or Lee Perry’s best albums. However, that’s kinda not the point. CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Album of the Month’ selections aren’t intended to be ‘the best’ of anything. Rather they are things that I enjoy listening to at the time. I am usually unimpressed by collaborations or albums featuring a plethora of guest artists. On this occasion though, two offbeat artists combining to push the boundaries of what either artist would do on their own has resulted in something interesting (for once). At least that’s my take on the matter. Critics frequently state that both artists were past their sell‑by date by 2012/2013 and the result of such an alliance was unmemorable (true) and nothing special (debateable). That’s their view and they are entitled to it. I disagree, as I’m entitled to.

BELIEVE IN MUSIC!

“Make your heart bleed! Put your soul into that damn thing. And try new things” – Dimebag Darrell (1966‑2004)


Tailpiece

There you go, back to what CRAVE Guitars/Basses/Effects/Amps is really all about. Admittedly, it feels good to focus on factual vintage guitar gear again after a number of recent fictional diversions (‘The Distortion Diaries’ and ‘The CRAVEman’). I hope you enjoyed it. Let’s hope that there is more fascinating vintage gear to come in due course. In the meantime, it’s onto the next article, whatever that might be. Watch this space…

“Well I think any author or musician is anxious to have legitimate sales of their products, partly so they’re rewarded for their success, partly so they can go on and do new things” – Bill Gates (1955‑)

Truth, peace, love, and guitar music be with you always. The CRAVEman, signing off for now. Until next time…

CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “Your imagination is infinite, boundless and unconstrained. You’ve just forgotten how to use it”

© 2026 CRAVE Guitars – Love Vintage Guitars.


Like it? Why not share it?
450B, 9V DC PSU, album of the month, American Metal, Attacker, Bass Guitar, believe in music, BI-FET Preamp, Bill Gates, block logo, C.R.A.V.E. Guitars, C.S. Lewis, Calvyne, Christy’s Minstrels, Classic Fuzz, collecterati, Compressor Sustainer, Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitars, crave (cool & rare american vintage electric) guitars, CRAVE Amplifiers, CRAVE Amps, CRAVE articles, CRAVE Basses, CRAVE blog, CRAVE effect pedals, CRAVE Effects, CRAVE features, CRAVE galleries, CRAVE Guitars, CRAVE Guitars Avatar, CRAVE Guitars Icon, CRAVE Guitars logo, CRAVE musings, CRAVE Quote, crave vintage basses, crave vintage guitars, Crave Vintage Guitars (CVG), CVG, David Bowie, Dimebag Darrell, DOD FX10, DOD FX17, DOD FX25, DOD FX50-B, DOD FX52, DOD FX54, DOD FX56, DOD FX65, DOD FX80 B, DOD PS-50, Eleanor Roosevelt, electric bass guitar, electric basses, electric guitars, Electro Harmonix Big Muff, Envelope Filter, Fender, Fender Electric XII, Fuzz Face, FX57, FX58, GAS, Gibson, Guild X-79 Skyhawk, Guitar Acquisition Syndrome, guitar music, Guitars, Hard Rock Distortion, Ibanez Tube Screamer, keep music live, Kramer ‘The Duke’ Deluxe Bass, Lee “Scratch” Perry, love, Love Vintage Guitars, Metal Maniac, More Tales From The Orbservatory, MTV, MXR Micro Chorus, MXR Noise Gate Line Driver, MXR Phase 45, MXR Phase 90, Neil Gaiman, Oprah Winfrey, Overdrive Plus, Pablo Picasso, peace, Quote of the Month, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Ray Bradbury, Robert Redford, S-100, S-300, script logo, Stereo Chorus, Terry Wilder, The CRAVEman, The Distortion Diaries, The Imaginary Transtemporal Affair, The Orb, The Orbserver In The Star House, TITA, Tone Bender, Truth, TTD, Until next time, vintage amps, vintage bass, vintage basses, vintage effect pedals, vintage effects, Vintage Guitars, vintage guitars uk, Voltaire, Wah-Volume, Walt Disney
29 Apr 2024

April 2024 – Artificial Intelligence takes on Vintage Guitars: Part II

by CRAVEGuitars | posted in: History, Introduction, Observations, Opinion | 0

Prelude

ALOHA AGAIN FINE FOLKS! Welcome once more to the weird and wonderful world of vintage guitars and thank you for joining me, a self‑confessed music and guitar nerd. Why not leave behind the senseless barbarism of heinous hostilities seemingly everywhere you look on our one and only home planet for a short while and join me on another peaceful and harmless diversion? If music has the power to change the world, then let’s put a proverbial platter on the turntable of life and play on and on until common sense prevails. Perhaps the collective majority of sensible people need another counter‑culture revolution. What can possibly be wrong with a bit of peace and love? We can hope. Anyhoo… I digress once more and I haven’t even got going yet. Apologies for the premature non sequitur.

Artificial Intelligence Part II

AI revisited

Artificial Intelligence (AI), as a current day technological marvel, is perhaps the antithesis to the bits of old‑world wood, metal and plastic cobbled together into desirable musical instruments. Despite the seeming disconnect, this article is Part II of III exploring what the current state of AI can contribute towards the subject. Like ‘Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back’ this article isn’t just a ‘difficult filling in the sandwich’, it actually does stand up pretty well on its own. There is no doubting the potential of AI in many areas of our lives but can it really do justice to vintage guitars?

There is no need to repeat preparatory exposition this month. The historical development of AI was covered pretty comprehensively in ‘Part I’ last month. If you want to go back for a recap or a first look at the basics, follow the link below (opens in a new tab):

March 2024 – Artificial Intelligence takes on Vintage Guitars: Part I (craveguitars.co.uk)

In Part I of the series, the entirety of AI’s output in response to 20 questions on the multifaceted world of CRAVE Vintage Guitars resulted in, literally, a black & white article comprising text‑only descriptions, mostly presented as bullet point lists. AI had the opportunity to present images to back up its results. However, it provided zero pictures, relying solely on words to make its points. To me, that seemed to be a major omission and was something a rational human (probably) wouldn’t do. I certainly wouldn’t, at least not out of choice. So, the next logical step was to address that pictorial oversight directly and see what AI would reveal when asked unequivocally to produce images. A digital depiction is worth a thousand kilobytes, so to speak.

CRAVE Vintage Guitars 8-Bit Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitar

“True art is characterised by an irresistible urge in the creative artist” – Albert Einstein (1879‑1955)


The rationale

I don’t usually write anecdotally but please bear with me for a moment. While the next bit may seem irrelevant, it does, I believe, demonstrate some of the complications with, and ramifications of, AI as it stands at the current time.

Being a admirer of modern art, I recently wanted an art print for my home. After doing my research, I came down to a work by Latvian‑born American artist Mark Rothko (1903‑1970), best known for his abstract colour field paintings produced from 1949 until his death. The piece I selected is called, ‘Blue, Green and Brown’ (1952). I approached a professional studio to print the image for me. The studio couldn’t acquire a high resolution image for accurate printing at the size I wanted, so they proceeded to put a lower resolution image through an AI enlargement tool to produce an image of sufficiently high resolution to be printed without obvious pixilation and digital artefacts. While the proof looked pleasant enough in isolation, when compared directly with the original, AI had egregiously robbed the image of its quintessential artistic detail, rendering it a pale imitation of the real thing, much like a good amateur forgery. AI had removed many of the ‘imperfections’ that made the original unique. Many people might actually prefer the manipulated image or they may not even realise it had been ‘bastardised’. This, to me was an issue. Personally, I much preferred the integrity of the original artistic creation, as Rothko intended it to be seen. Sadly, because of copyright, I cannot share the evidence but, believe me, in a small way it reveals implications of AI for many of humanity’s creative arts.

“A painting is not a picture of an experience, but is the experience” – Mark Rothko (1903‑1970)

The intentional act of digitally ‘airbrushing’ out the supposed defectiveness in our 21st Century world – whether it is intentional or not – is a concern. What is worse is that it is an incremental insidious intrusion. It is happening all around us, every day – whether it is subtle or blatant – and has been for a long time. Just take a look at studio photos of fashion models, actresses, pop stars, etc. This interventionist rendering transforms reality into a skewed, artificially ‘improved’ view of something that somebody, somewhere considered imperfect. This alteration from real to surreal is a worrying trend, and one that we may not even be aware of under normal everyday circumstances. We have all become unwittingly complicit in accepting these glossy facsimiles as, in some way, genuine and even aspirational. The trend is surreptitiously subverting our expectations of the tangible. On top of the word Photoshop becoming a verb rather than a noun, AI is exacerbating this issue and very soon, we won’t be able to tell that it is being done. What you see isn’t what you get. A picture can tell a thousand lies.

The author’s recent experiences led directly to the rationale for Part II of this exploration into what AI’s digital world view of vintage guitars may look like. Whereas last month’s article was a test of AI’s narrative approach to vintage guitars, this month, we will be focusing solely on AI’s interpretation of vintage guitars in visual form. Other than the prologue and epilogue, there is nothing herein authentically human.

Generative AI (GAI) tools like Midjourney and OpenAI’s DALL‑E 3 are easily accessible and are being used widely to produce pictures (generative art) by interpreting written instructions. This is the straightforward process used to submit the examples presented in this article. Can Generative Artificial Intelligence really create intelligent art? Let us see. The proof is out there and the quest to unearth the evidence continues unabated.

“Art is not what you see, but what you make others see” – Edgar Degas (1834‑1917)


The CRAVE Guitars’ test

I will present AI with some specific challenges and see how AI responds and, once again, I will let the AI do the hard work. As before, I will leave my humble critique until the end of the article.

Last month, I suggested eight benchmarks for evaluating AI’s responses, summarised below:

  1. To understand a question correctly without over‑specificity
  2. To interpret and extrapolate relevant information objectively within a wider context
  3. To present a cogent argument that can adequately be judged and/or challenged
  4. To form a genuine opinion from scratch without relevant information being readily available in the first place, in the same way that a person might do in the case of uncertainty
  5. To debate the initial result to achieve a potentially better outcome
  6. To produce a creative response that improves on the original information input by humans
  7. To remember what it has already output
  8. To understand fully what humans want or expect from ‘intelligence’

While these tests were intended to provide an assessment framework for last month’s narrative responses, they mostly still work for images (sort of, with a bit of imagination). Unlike last month, there are far fewer words and plenty of pictures this time around.

“Art is the lie that enables us to realize the truth.” – Pablo Picasso (1881‑1973)


Twenty Questions – AI produced images of vintage guitars

I asked a GAI image creator to produce digital images based on simple text instructions. A small proportion of the results are shown below. In each case, I have presented at least two images for each instruction and in several cases more to show the diversity (or not) of what AI created. So, there are well over 50 AI images for your delectation. There were plenty of others produced. I don’t suggest that the ones used are the ‘best’, only that they were representative of the instruction. Hopefully, by the end, you can make up your own mind about how effective the technology is. With my permission, GAI will now take centre stage and I will potter off to make multiple cups of coffee. See you later for my opinion.

Instruction #1 – Design a logo for CRAVE Vintage Guitars

AI response #1

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Logos

Instruction #2 – Create a physical guitar shop and museum/gallery designs for CRAVE Vintage Guitars

AI response #2

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Shop Designs
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Gallery Designs

Instruction #3 – Create a web site home page design for CRAVE Vintage Guitars

AI response #3

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Home Page Designs

Instruction #4 – Create a magazine advertisement for CRAVE Vintage Guitars with images of several vintage guitars

AI response #4

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Magazine Ad Designs

Instruction #5 – Create digital art showing a sunburst vintage guitar against a background of amplifiers and speaker cabinets with an Asian rug in the foreground. A number of effect pedals on the floor

AI response #5

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Guitar Amps & Effects

Instruction #6 – Create digital art showing a black and white vintage guitar in its guitar case with a purple fur fabric interior along with a strap and lead coiled in a compartment

AI response #6

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Black & White Guitar in Case

Instruction #7 – Create digital art showing number of vintage Gibson and Fender solid body electric guitars displayed hanging on a classically decorated solid wall along with logo memorabilia

AI response #7

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Wall Displays

Instruction #8 – Create digital art showing a vintage solid body electric guitar on a luthier’s workbench

AI response #8

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Guitar Workbench

Instruction #9 – Create digital art showing a jazz guitarist on stage wearing a zoot suit and playing a vintage jazz guitar with backing band

AI response #9

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Jazz Guitarist

Instruction #10 – Create digital art showing a blues guitarist wearing a dark suit and hat sitting on a smoky stage playing a vintage electric jazz guitar plugged into a vintage valve combo amp

AI response #10

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Blues Guitarist

Instruction #11 – Create digital art showing a hippie with long hair, tie‑dye shirt and flared jeans playing a vintage solid body electric guitar on an open air music festival stage with a backing band and bright, psychedelic light show

AI response #11

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Psych Rock Guitarist

Instruction #12 – Create digital art showing a heavy metal guitarist on a dark stage playing a vintage solid body electric guitar, dressed in a Goth inspired outfit

AI response #12

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Metal Guitarist

Instruction #13 – Create digital art showing a Rastafarian reggae guitarist on a black, green, red and yellow stage playing an electric solid body vintage guitar, with a backing band

AI response #13

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Reggae Guitarist

Instruction #14 – Create digital art showing a well‑dressed funk/disco guitarist playing a vintage electric guitar on stage with a mirror ball

AI response #14

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Funk Disco Guitarist

Instruction #15 – Create digital art showing a folk guitarist playing a vintage steel strung acoustic guitar with a backing band on a folk festival stage

AI response #15

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Folk Guitarist

Instruction #16 – Create digital art showing a classical guitarist playing a vintage nylon strung acoustic guitar seated on a stage

AI response #16

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Classical Guitarist

Instruction #17 – Create digital art showing a young rock guitarist playing a vintage electric guitar through a vintage amplifier sitting on a bed in a bedroom with walls covered in music posters

AI response #17

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Bedroom Guitarist

Instruction #18 – Create digital art of a vintage guitar in [a variety] of fine art styles [including Renaissance, impressionist, realist, abstract, romantic, pop art, optical art, expressionist, cubist, art nouveau, art deco, dada, Bauhaus, primitivism, pointillist, and pre‑Raphaelite]. NB. See if you can identify the styles from the images.

AI response #18

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 1
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 2
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 3
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 4
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 5
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Fine Art 6

Instruction #19 – Create digital art of a vintage guitar in [a variety] of modern graphic art styles [including illustration, eight‑bit, fantasy, manga, anime, futurist, sci‑fi, and steampunk]. NB. See if you can identify the styles from the images.

AI response #19

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 1
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 2
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 3
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 4
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 5
Crave Vintage Guitars AI Pop Art 6

Instruction #20 – Create digital art of a vintage solid body electric guitar found in a dusty, cobwebbed attic amongst other objects d’art

AI response #20

Crave Vintage Guitars AI Loft Guitar

Just for a bit of fun, I also asked GAI to ‘use Crave Guitars as a starting point, create digital art of an ‘ideal’ Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitar’. The result was…

Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitar

Hhhmmm.


Human observation and verdict

Well? Are you downright dazzled, dizzyingly discombobulated or decidedly dumbfounded?

First, let’s get the disclaimers out of the way. As mentioned in a previous article, I am not an artist or designer but I feel that I have a reasonable eye for what works and what doesn’t. My generalised opinions, as always, are entirely my own and therefore humanly flawed.

So, there you have it. No words this time, just a plethora of GAI created images based on just twenty or so straightforward text inputs. The images are exactly as produced by the AI image creator; they have not been manipulated in any way.

The legal situation, as far as I can ascertain is that the copyright for the images belongs exclusively to the person who input the criteria used to create the image, not the GAI platform itself. Just as a camera manufacturer doesn’t have copyright over the images produced by a photographer using one of its products. So, at the time of writing, I am within my rights to publish the images and to copyright them as part of this article for the purposes of objective analysis and critique.

It is clear that the technology is very, very clever indeed and also very powerful. However, it is worth remembering that it is just an IT system, albeit a potent one. It would take a long time for a human to create ‘new’ images like those that took seconds using a GAI image creator. I certainly couldn’t produce images like these from scratch whether using traditional or technological means, so kudos to GAI for that alone. On the surface and with a quick glance, some of the images are almost convincing. It is only when scrutinising the images with any kind of critical eye that things begin to fall apart very quickly. The devil really is in the detail.

For instance, the CRAVE Guitars logos are unusable with misspellings, artefacts, anomalies, strange letters/words and peculiar components. Also, why no simple logos and what about logos using colour? The results are VERY different form the genuine CRAVE Guitars logo. I still prefer the human original to the over‑fussy monochrome GAI creations.

Can GAI produce authentic original intelligent art all by itself? No, I don’t believe so. As of now, AI image building remains derivative. Its algorithms work by sampling a vastly diverse range of artistic styles and using that as the basis for producing ‘new’ images. Try inputting insufficient or vague information for the algorithms to work on and it struggles. Even some quite specific instructions result in a ‘fail’.

There are still, at least for now, discernible differences between GAI‑created art and genuine art created by humans. AI is a tool but it isn’t (yet) a replacement for human imagination and artistic expression. AI can, however, help to bring a fresh perspective, explore new vistas and to push the boundaries of existing art and photography. In the future, I predict that a proportion of art will undoubtedly be a collaboration between human creativity and machine manipulation.

After requesting many variations of multiple images, it is clear that GAI has an ‘artistic style’ of its own and, once recognised, it quickly becomes generic and, at least to my eyes unappealing. Much like generic CGI (Computer Generated Imagery) in cinema, the human eye and brain can differentiate the artificial outputs from practical effects, resulting in the digital output being disappointingly unconvincing, at least most of the time.

When it comes to the guitars themselves, GAI clearly has no real idea of (and perhaps more importantly, simply doesn’t care) what a guitar is, how it is created, what its functions are and the differences between them. That is, I believe a fundamental part of the problem. GAI does not comprehend in the slightest what comprises an actual musical instrument, vintage or otherwise. To all intents and purposes, the concept of a guitar (or anything else for that matter) may as well be a plain lump of rock to GAI. At least a human artist would have some conception of what it is they are attempting to portray.

“In the literal sense, the programmed computer understands what the car or the adding machine understand: namely, exactly nothing” – John Searle (1932‑, American philosopher)

Many of the body shapes are unrecognisable, pickups are plain wrong, control layouts are bizarre, necks and fingerboard inlays are completely out of whack. Some ‘guitars’ have semi‑acoustic f‑holes where there shouldn’t be any. Proportions are often wrong and headstocks don’t match body type, etc. GAI also seems inclined to add plenty of unnecessary embellishments, decorations and accoutrements for no apparent reason. Peculiar.

Interestingly, in terms of equality, I didn’t specify race, gender or age to the GAI image creator. Of the images featuring guitarists, they were predominantly (but not exclusively) white, male and younger. None of the guitarists featured were left‑handed. Why this should be, other than perhaps reflecting the source material used by GAI, I know not. Like 21st Century first world nations, GAI has some way to go in learning about diversity.

The images may impress a total newbie to guitars but I’m sure anyone with any sort of interest in guitars, let alone vintage instruments, would not be convinced in the slightest. To an expert, the renditions jar significantly and are simply unacceptable representations. The images couldn’t really be used in any genuine situation other than, for instance, a critique like this. The images made me contemplate just what they could actually be used for. They don’t even work as a genuine artistic impression of reality. At best, GAI is a simulation of reality, not reality.

If GAI images would be used in a real situation, they would probably need far more specific instructions and or greater computing power to interpret genuine instruments realistically. In addition, further human manipulation would be required to finesse the images before they could be suitable. To me, there is a gaping difference between a picture and a painting or an image and a work of art.

“Art is a line around your thoughts” – Gustav Klimt (1862‑1918)

Interestingly, when asked to create digital art in the style of a specific school (e.g. surrealist, impressionist, cubist or art deco) or a specific artist (e.g. Andy Warhol, Picasso or Salvador Dali), GAI failed completely to generate something representative of the art form or artist. On the other hand, GAI could create digital art in a way that current human artists may not conceive. Although impressive in its own right, it again completely missed the point. Amusingly to me, at least, the first three letters of ‘artificial’ are ‘art’. GAI’s representational interpretation of real art isn’t actually art, it is an artifice (sic!). GAI images are not really inspirational or worthy of evoking or stimulating a profound emotional response in the way a genuine work of art might warrant. Yet.

I could go on and on about where faults may be found. However, that level of pedantic analysis would kinda miss the point of what this article is trying to demonstrate. GAI will undoubtedly get much, much better and probably not very long after this published article becomes obsolete. GAI image creation technology, at least to me, is a work‑in‑progress. That last comment is exactly what I said about the narrative responses in the previous article

Perhaps a synergetic integral relationship between GAI and humans should really be called ‘Augmented Intelligence’ (still AI). After all, and it is worth stating, computer generated artwork is nothing new. Humans have been using computers in art, design, animation, typography, film and photography (and many other forms of artistic expression) for a very long time, long before GAI came onto the scene. Digital tools like Adobe Photoshop and Corel PaintShop Pro are today’s graphic industry standards and they are beginning to integrate AI technology into their software in order to stay current and relevant. Therefore, using generative art technology is essentially only a natural progression along that very long evolutionary road. As such, then, it cannot be condemned out of hand.

So, cutting to the chase, would any of the images pass the Turing Test or even the CRAVE Guitars Test? Not to anyone with any interest or insight into the subject matter. Personally, I won’t be using AI imagery for serious use any time soon. I think that most professional artists in the creative industries would probably agree. However, it would be naïve of me to suggest that it won’t improve to the point where an AI image might be indistinguishable from something a human might envisage. Definitely not yet though. For me, I’m sticking to the likes of Mark Rothko for my modern art fix.

“The most interesting painting is one that expresses more of what one thinks than of what one sees” – Mark Rothko (1903‑1970)


Final thoughts on AI

Right, here we are, two thirds of the way through this 3‑part exploration of what AI can do within the context of the vintage guitar world. So far, so… erm, OK‑ish. At its most superficial, the technology is already truly remarkable and getting better all the time, so it would be disingenuous and immature to propose otherwise. However, as GAI stands at the time or writing, it still has some way to go.

It is all too easy to be swayed by the clever technology as a means, rather than focus purely on the pragmatic usefulness of the outcome as an end. The former is undoubtedly extraordinary, while the latter is still, for the time being at least, lacking. It is the ultimate inadequacy of the results that is still AI’s principal weakness. Given that the publically available GAI tools are still in their infancy, that mundane conclusion will, I suspect, be short‑lived. We should, perhaps, remember that we wouldn’t have been undertaking this sort of examination a year or two ago and in a year or two’s time, the benchmark by which we judge comparative differences will definitely be significantly raised.

For now, GAI is not a David Hockney, Damien Hirst, Edward Hopper or Banksy. Thankfully. It is probably worth keeping an eye on how things evolve from here on.

“We are entering a new world where creative machines will be our partners, not just tools.” – Fei‑Fei Li (Computer scientist, 1976‑)


CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Album of the Month’

Sticking to last month’s determination to avoid the generic style of music that could be created by AI, this month’s selection is another miracle of human creativity, while still being mainstream. This month’s accolade therefore goes to…

Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds – Push The Sky Away (2013) – The fifteenth studio album by Australian Nick Cave and his band The Bad Seeds was released in mid‑February 2013. Nick Cave described the album, “if I were to use that threadbare metaphor of albums being like children, then Push The Sky Away is the ghost‑baby in the incubator and Warren [Ellis]‘s loops are its tiny, trembling heartbeat.” Very apt. The album preceded the tragic deaths of his two sons in 2015 and 2022, so it retains a lighter, though still profound, side to Cave’s song writing. The concluding title track is the culmination of something sublime and, is in itself, a monumental emotional and transcendent achievement in its gentle but devastating mere 4 minutes and 7 seconds. A worthy album of the month and a work of (creative human) art indeed.

Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds – Push The Sky Away (2013)

“The aim of art is to represent not the outward appearance of things, but their inward significance” – Aristotle (384‑322BCE)


Tailpiece

Phew! Two parts down and one to go. While the first was a ballsy barrage of words, this has been a veritable visual volley of pupil‑popping pictures (I had to get at least one pretentious puerile alliterative assonance in. Sorry folks).

I truly hope that you have been able to gain something from this intermediate excursion into the endless expanse of the artificial unknown. Every day, The Matrix gets closer to reality, whatever that is. Has the journey so far in any way changed my perspective on vintage guitars? No. It has, however, changed my perspective on technology. Before embarking on this journey, I must admit that I had very little idea about what AI could do. There is, I believe, no doubt that AI can be an exciting enabler for humanity’s benefit, provided its darker, far more perilous potential is properly constrained by responsible human moderation.

As a teaser, next month will be the conclusion of this extensive round‑the‑computer AI trip. For Part III, we will take a different look at the bigger music industry picture within which vintage guitars occupy a small but important niche. Until then, enjoy the spring in the northern hemisphere and autumn in the south.

Truth, peace, love, and guitar music be with you always. Until next time…

CRAVE Guitars’ ‘Quote of the Month’: “It is better to fail at trying to be a good person than succeed at being a bad one”

© 2024 CRAVE Guitars – Love Vintage Guitars.

Like it? Why not share it?
abstract, Adobe, AI, Albert Einstein, album of the month, anime, Aristotle, art deco, art nouveau, Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Intelligence, Banksy, Bass Guitar, Bauhaus, C.R.A.V.E. Guitars, CGI, Computer Generated Imagery, Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric Guitars, Corel, crave (cool & rare american vintage electric) guitars, CRAVE Amps, CRAVE articles, CRAVE Basses, CRAVE blog, CRAVE effect pedals, CRAVE Effects, CRAVE features, CRAVE galleries, CRAVE Guitars, CRAVE Guitars logo, CRAVE musings, crave vintage basses, crave vintage guitars, cubist, Dada, DALL-E 3, Damien Hirst, David Hockney, Edgar Degas, Edward Hopper, eight bit, electric bass guitar, electric basses, electric guitars, expressionist, fantasy, Fei-Fei Li, Fender, futurist, GAI, Generative AI, generative art, Gibson, guitar music, Guitars, Gustav Klimt, illustration, impressionist, John Searle, love, Love Vintage Guitars, manga, Mark Rothko, Midjourney, Music Man, Nick Cave, Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds, OpenAI, optical art, Pablo Picasso, PaintShop Pro, peace, Photoshop, pointillist, pop art, pre-Raphaelite, primitivism, Quote of the Month, realist, renaissance, romantic, sci-fi, Star Wars, steampunk, The Empire Strikes Back, The Matrix, Truth, Turing Test, Until next time, vintage amps, vintage bass, vintage basses, vintage effect pedals, vintage effects, Vintage Guitars, vintage guitars uk, Warren Ellis

Love Vintage Guitars

Music Matters
Create. Play.
Be inspired!
Share the passion…
Change lives for good

Welcome to the world of CRAVE (Cool & Rare American Vintage Electric) Guitars. Established 2007.

E-mail: info@craveguitars.co.uk

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Visit CRAVE Guitars’ Social Media Pages…

Latest Tweets on X From CRAVE Guitars:

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

Subscribe to CRAVE Guitars' Musings via e-mail

Enter your e-mail address to subscribe to CRAVE Guitars' Musings and receive notifications of new posts by email.

© CRAVE Guitars 2007-2026 - Love Vintage Guitars

 

Loading Comments...